Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published September 2002

Attention to Faces: A Change-Blindness Study

Abstract

What strategies does human vision use to attend to faces and their features? How are such strategies altered by 2-D inversion or photographic negation? We report two experiments in which these questions were studied with the flicker task of the change-blindness literature. In experiment 1 we studied detection of configural changes to the eyes or mouth, and found that upright faces receive more efficient attention than inverted faces, and that faces shown with normal contrast receive more efficient attention than faces shown in photographic negative. Moreover, eyes receive greater attention than the mouth. In experiment 2 we studied detection of local changes to the eyes or mouth, and found the same results. It is well known that inversion and negation impair the perception and recognition of faces. The experiments presented here extend previous findings by showing that inversion and negation also impair attention to faces.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Althoff R R, Cohen N J, 1999 “Eye-movement-based memory effect: A reprocessing effect in face perception” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25 997–1010
Arnheim R, 1954 Art and Visual Perception (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)
Ballard D H, Hayhoe M M, Pelz J B, 1995 “Memory representations in natural tasks” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7 66–80
Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G, 1996 “Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 551–565
Bentin S, Deouell L Y, 2000 “Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate processes” Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 35–54
Böetzel K, Schulze S, Stodiek S R G, 1995 “Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials” Experimental Brain Research 104 135–143
Borod J C, Vingiano W, Cytryn F, 1988 “The effects of emotion and ocular dominance on lateral eye movement” Neuropsychologia 26 213–220
Braje W L, Kersten D, Tarr M J, Troje N F, 1998 “Illumination effects in face recognition” Psychobiology 26 371–380
Bruce V, Healey P, Burton M, Doyle T, Coombes A, Linney A, 1991 “Recognising facial surfaces” Perception 20 755–769
Bruce V, Langton S, 1994 “The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces” Perception 23 803–822
Cauquil A S, Edmonds G E, Taylor M J, 2000 “Is the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention?” Neuro Report 11 2167–2171
Davies G, Ellis H, Shepherd J, 1978 “Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation” Journal of Applied Psychology 63 180–187
Deubel H, Schneider W X, 1996 “Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism” Vision Research 36 1827–1837
Diamond R, Carey S, 1986 “Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 107–117
Driver J, Baylis G C, 1989 “Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15 448–456
Duncan J, 1984 “Selective attention and the organization of visual information” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 501–517
Eimer M, 1998 “Does the face-specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye detector?” Neuro Report 9 2945–2948
Eimer M, 2000 “Attentional modulations of event-related brain potentials sensitive to faces” Cognitive Neuropsychology 17 103–116
Eimer M, McCarthy R A, 1999 “Prosopagnosia and structural encoding of faces: Evidence from event-related potentials” Neuro Report 10 255–259
Enns J T, Shore D I, 1997 “Separate influences of orientation and lighting in the inverted-face effect” Perception & Psychophysics 59 23–31
Fantz R L, 1961 “The origin of form perception” Scientific American 204 66–72
Farah M J, Tanaka J W, Drain H M, 1995 “What causes the face inversion effect?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 628–634
Freire A, Lee K, Symons L A, 2000 “The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence” Perception 29 159–170
Galper R E, 1970 “Recognition of faces in photographic negative” Psychonomic Science 19 207–208
Galper R E, Hochberg J, 1971 “Recognition memory for photographs of faces” American Journal of Psychology 84 351–354
Gauthier I, Tarr M J, 1997 “Becoming a ‘Greeble’ expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition” Vision Research 37 1673–1682
George N, Dolan R J, Fink G R, Baylis G C, Russell C, Driver J, 1999 “Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform face gyrus” Nature Neuroscience 2 574–580
George N, Evans J, Fiori N, Davidoff J, Renault B, 1996 “Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces” Cognitive Brain Research 4 65–76
Goren C, Sarty M M, Wu P, 1975 “Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants” Pediatrics 56 544–549
Gosselin F, Schyns P G, 2001 “Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks” Vision Research 41 2261–2271
Gregory R L, 1973 Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing (New York: McGraw-Hill)
Haig N D, 1984 “The effect of feature displacement on face recognition” Perception 13 505–512
Haxby J V, Horwitz B, Ungerleider L G, Maisog J M, Pietrini P, Grady C L, 1994 “The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: A PET–rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations” Journal of Neuroscience 14 6336–6353
Hayes A, 1988 “Identification of two-tone images; some implications for high-and low-spatial-frequency processes in human vision” Perception 17 429–436
Hayes T, Morrone M C, Burr D C, 1986 “Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images” Perception 15 595–602
Hayhoe M M, Bensinger D, Ballard D H, 1998 “Task constraints in visual working memory” Vision Research 38 125–137
Hill H, Bruce V, 1996 “The effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 986–1004
Jemel B, George N, Chaby L, Fiori N, Renault B, 1999 “Differential processing of part-to-whole and part-to-part face priming: An ERP study” Neuro Report 10 1069–1075
Johnson M H, Dziurawiec S, Ellis H, Morton J, 1991 “Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline” Cognition 40 1–19
Johnston A, Hill H, Carman N, 1992 “Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal” Perception 21 365–375
Kanwisher N, Chun M M, McDermott J, Ledden P J, 1996 “Functional imaging of human visual recognition” Cognitive Brain Research 5 55–67
Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun M M, 1997 “The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception” Journal of Neuroscience 17 4302–4311
Kemp R, McManus C, Pigott T, 1990 “Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images” Perception 19 531–543
Kemp R, Pike G, White P, Musselman A, 1996 “Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues” Perception 25 37–52
Khurana B, Smith W C, Baker M T, 2000 “Not to be and then to be: Visual representation of ignored unfamiliar faces” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 246–263
Klein R, Kingstone A, Pontefract A, 1992 “Orienting of visual attention”, in Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading Ed. Rayner K (New York: Springer) pp 46–65
Kleiner K A, Banks M S, 1987 “Stimulus energy does not account for 2-month-olds' face preferences” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 13 594–600
Kohler W, 1940 Dynamics in Psychology (New York: Liveright)
Lansing C R, McConkie G W, 1999 “Attention to facial regions in segmental and prosodic visual speech perception tasks” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42 526–539
Leder H, 1996 “Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing” Perception 25 355–366
Leder H, Bruce V, 1998 “Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 51 449–473
Leder H, Bruce V, 2000 “When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 53 513–536
Lewis M B, Johnston R A, 1997 “Familiarity, target set and false positives in face recognition” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9 437–459
Liu C H, Chaudhuri A, 1997 “Face recognition with multi-tone and two-tone photographic negatives” Perception 26 1289–1296
Liu C H, Collin C A, Burton A M, Chaudhuri A, 1999 “Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative” Vision Research 39 4003–4009
Liu C H, Collin C A, Chaudhuri A, 2000 “Does face recognition rely on encoding of 3-D surface? Examining the role of shape-from-shading and shape-from-stereo” Perception 29 729–743
McCarthy G, Puce A, Gore J C, Allison T, 1997 “Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 605–610
Mach E, 1886/1959 The Analysis of Sensations, and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical (New York: Dover)
Mack A, Rock I, 1998 Inattentional Blindness (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)
Meltzoff A N, Moore M K, 1977 “Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates” Science 198 75–78
Mertens I, Siegmund H, Grüsser O J, 1993 “Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task” Neuropsychologia 31 989–998
Morton J, Johnson M H, 1991 “CONSPEC and CONLERN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition” Psychological Review 98 164–181
O'Regan J K, Deubel H, Clark J J, Rensink R A, 2000 “Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking” Visual Cognition 7 191–211
Pashler H, 1988 “Familiarity and visual change detection” Perception & Psychophysics 44 369–378
Phillips R J, 1972 “Why are faces hard to recognise in photographic negative?” Perception & Psychophysics 12 425–426
Phillips W A, 1974 “On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory” Perception & Psychophysics 16 283–290
Posner M I, 1980 “Orienting of attention” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32 3–26
Posner M I, Snyder C R R, Davidson B J, 1980 “Attention and the detection of signals” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109 160–174
Puce A, Allison T, Asgari M, Gore J C, McCarthy G, 1996 “Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letter strings, and textures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study” Journal of Neuroscience 16 5205–5215
Puce A, Allison T, Gore J C, McCarthy G, 1995 “Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI” Journal of Neurophysiology 74 1192–1199
Ramachandran V S, 1988 “Perception of shape from shading” Nature 331 163–166
Reinitz M T, Lammers W J, Cochran B P, 1992 “Memory-conjunction errors: Miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory” Memory & Cognition 20 1–11
Reinitz M T, Morrissey J, Demb J, 1994 “Role of attention in face encoding” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 161–168
Rensink R A, 2000a “The dynamic representation of scenes” Visual Cognition 7 17–42
Rensink R A, 2000b “Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing” Visual Cognition 7 345–376
Rensink R A, 2000c “Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing” Vision Research 40 1469–1487
Rensink R A, O'Regan J K, Clark J J, 1995 “Image flicker is as good as saccades in making large scene changes invisible” Perception 24 Supplement, 26–27
Rensink R A, O'Regan J K, Clark J J, 1997 “To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes” Psychological Science 8 368–373
Rhodes G, 1988 “Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinates of facial appearance” Perception 17 43–63
Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson A, 1993 “What's lost in inverted faces?” Cognition 47 25–57
Rock I, 1974 Orientation and Form (New York: Academic Press)
Rock I, 1975 “The perception of disoriented figures” Scientific American 230 78–85
Sackett G P, 1966 “Monkeys reared in isolation with pictures as visual input: Evidence for innate releasing mechanism” Science 154 1470–1473
Scapinello K F, Yarmey A D, 1970 “The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli” Psychonomic Science 21 329–331
Searcy J H, Bartlett J C, 1996 “Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 904–915
Sergent J, 1984 “An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception” British Journal of Psychology 75 221–242
Shore D I, Klein R M, 2000 “The effects of scene inversion on change blindness” Journal of General Psychology 127 27–43
Simons D, Levin J, 1997 “Change blindness” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 261–267
Subramanian S, Biederman I, 1997 “Does contrast reversal affect object identification?” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 38(4) S998
Tanaka J W, Farah M J, 1993 “Parts and wholes in face recognition” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 37 225–245
Tarr M J, Kersten D, Bülthoff H H, 1998 “Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination” Vision Research 38 2259–2275
Thompson P, 1980 “Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion” Perception 9 483–484
Troje N F, Bülthoff H H, 1996 “Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape” Vision Research 36 1761–1771
Troje N F, Bülthoff H H, 1998 “How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views?” Vision Research 38 79–89
Valentine T, 1988 “Upside-down faces: A review of the effects of inversion upon face recognition” British Journal of Psychology 79 471–491
Valentine T, Bruce V, 1986 “The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition” Acta Psychologica 61 259–273
Williams P, Simons D J, 2000 “Detecting changes in novel, complex three-dimensional objects” Visual Cognition 7 297–322
Wojciulik E, Kanwisher N, Driver J, 1998 “Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study” Journal of Neurophysiology 79 1574–1579
Yarbus A, 1967 Eye Movements and Vision (New York: Plenum)
Yarmey A D, 1971 “Recognition memory for familiar ‘public’ faces: Effects of orientation and delay” Psychonomic Science 24 286–288
Yin R K, 1969 “Looking at upside-down faces” Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 141–145
Young A W, Hellawell D, Hay D C, 1987 “Configurational information in face perception” Perception 16 747–759
Zelinsky G J, 1997 “Eye movements during a change detection search task” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 38(4) S373
Zelinsky G J, 2001 “Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies” Perception & Psychophysics 63 209–225

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: September 2002
Issue published: September 2002

Rights and permissions

© 2002 SAGE Publications.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 12375876

Authors

Affiliations

Temre N Davies
Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Donald D Hoffman
Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Perception.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 758

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 15 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 14

  1. Was Marilyn Monroe myopic and an early adopter of colored contact lens...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Reversing the Luminance Polarity of Control Faces: Why Are Some Negati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Looking at you: celebrity direct eye gaze influences social media post...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Put a (Limbal) Ring on It: Women Perceive Men’s Limbal Rings as a Heal...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  5. White eyes are the window to the pure soul: Metaphorical association a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Environmental factors and features that influence visual search in a 3...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Change deafness for simultaneous voices
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Attentional Capture by Change in Direct Gaze
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  9. Preliminary Evidence that the Limbal Ring Influences Facial Attractive...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Does Facial Processing Prioritize Change Detection?...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  11. Early cortical responses are sensitive to changes in face stimuli
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Attention to Configural Information in Change Detection for Faces
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  13. Adaptive allocation of attention: effects of sex and sociosexuality on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. When a face is (or is not) more than the sum of its features: Configur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub