Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!
Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:
Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you have any questions, please ask me on [[User talk:|my talk page]]. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.
Hej! I noticed that you have added the generic "communist party" as P102 to the following items: Q111844383, Q111797206, and Q6042935. Could you please find out what their actual parties were (for example, any of the items for the Communist Party of Sweden) and change them to that instead? Thank you.
You are one of the three winners of the Sweden category of the International Museum Day Wikidata Competition 2022 – congratulations and thank you for your valuable contribution to free knowledge! You can find all results and winners here: Wikidata:Events/International Museum Day 2022/Results. We will contact you again in the near future so you can collect your prize. If you like to, you can use the template {{User IMD 22+}} on your user page. --~~~~ on behalf of Wikimedia Sverige
Det vil være en ret enkel operation at køre følgende søgning, der finder alle svensker kirker (~2500 stk) med architectural ensemble (Q1497375), og derefter via Quickstatements fjerne Q1497375. Skal jeg gøre det?
Could be done I feel it was added 2 records for every church in Sweden but one record is enough. The problem is that the data is from the Swedish Swedish National Heritage Board (Q631844) that has much more information about church buildings.....
@Larske I feel we had a discussion on Swedish "Bybrunnen" some years ago about this. The reason is that Swedish National Heritage Board (Q631844) has both "anläggning"(more buildings) and "byggnad" ( one building) which is overkill for Wikipedia and Wikidata... in Swedish the definitions wordlist
I've always wondered about the purpose of that value here. It really makes little sense to me. So far I've come to the conclusion that it was used as some sort of "default" value. A lot of the instance of(P31)s of i.e. her import of Danish ancient monument ID(P3596)s were/are rather weird too.
Please note that I've just now managed to merge 437 duplicate Swedish churches. I didn't yet figure out how to programmatically remove duplicate coords, so most of them still have those.
Länk till fråga som ger en lista på par av objekt som är instans av begravningsplats inom samma administrativa område (kommun) och som har koordinater som skiljer sig mindre än 100 meter.
Av de 19 paren finns det flera dubbletter, men några kanske är helt ok att ha som separata objekt.
Jag har inte kollat närmare men misstänker att du är pappa till många av dessa dubbletter. Det kan också hända att det är koordinaterna för något av objekten i paret som felaktiga (copy-paste?)
Bra om du kan ta en titt på detta och göra "merge" där så är lämpligt.
@Larske Är en del saker importerade från fornminnesregistret Q29577695 och Q105529159 frågan är om dom är samma sak eller bara ligger nära varandra... känns som jag missa kyrkogårdssemantik kursen på mellanstadiet....
I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender system that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.
I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our system based on your previous edits.
Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.
The study will start in late January 2022 or early February 2022, and it should take no more than 30 minutes.
#Find svenske "orter" per kommune ("Orter i X kommun") på svwiki uden P131. ZZhqYWw4.tsv er en petscan af "Kategori:Orter i Sverige efter kommun". svenskakommun.tsv er en liste på formen "qvalue,svensk kommunenavn". output er qvalues for "ort,kommun". for orter in $(gawk -F'\t' '$2 ~ /Orter_i_.+_kommun/ {print $2}' ZZhqYWw4.tsv); do curl --data-urlencode "categories=$orter" -d "format=tsv" -d "psid=21153908" "https://petscan.wmflabs.org/" | gawk -F'\t' -v orter="$orter" '$1 ~ /[1-9]/ {print $7 "\t" substr(orter,9)}'; done | tr '_' ' ' | gawk -F'\t' 'BEGIN {print "qid,P131"} FNR==NR{a[$2]=$1; next;} a[$2] {print $1 "," a[$2]}' svenskakommun.tsv - > svenskaorterP131.tsv
Jeg har ikke kigget på de svenske artiklers kilder. Indtil videre er jeg udelukkende gået efter hvad der var i "Kategori:Orter i Sverige efter kommun".
Korrekt. Mit ønske var at få dem overført til wikidata automatisk. Når det kun er et par håndfulde der er tale om kan man sagtens gøre det manuelt, men når det er flere hundrede...
Hi! I (accidentally) saw you create Q110456810 for use by Q6256938, but it seems like it's a translation (and duplicate) of Q16849727? Is the new item a different occupation? —HELLKNOWZ∣TALK∣enWiki 14:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
in this case I feel its very historical incorrect swedish naming to call a person "verksamhetskonsult " when active 1950....
we had this merging problem for "botanist" vs. "botaniker" see Talk:Q46058221 .... then it was Google Translate that said its the same.... when I asked the national archives they said they didnt know;-)
The basic problem I feel is that we in Wikidata has no common goal/vision if the source is the most important or if "Google translate" should decide if its same as
Sounds good and thanks for the detailed clarification! I was just concerned if it's a mistake or not. Do what you think is best, since I don't know anything about the subject, this occupation, nor do I speak Swedish.:)
Hi as said this is complex.... and I guess neither you and me are domain specialists.... I have looked into how occupations are handled by the archives in Sweden and its even worse see GITHUB in Swedish https://github.com/salgo60/HISCOKoder
My wild guess ....
before professionals has problem organize occupations so they are consistent between sources we will get even more mess in WIkidata as we import from everywhere
Såg att du använde Hovfotograf under befattningar. Just nu är det en instans av Titel, men egentligen borde det väl liksom Hovleverantör vara en utmärkelse?
%20biography.png){kind=link}