How Boris Johnson could be forced to resign

Tory MPs are gearing up to change the rules around leadership elections

Jon Stone
Policy Correspondent
Wednesday 06 July 2022 15:33
Comments
<p>Britain Politics</p>

Britain Politics

Boris Johnson's leadership is very much on the brink, with around two dozen MPs having quit government jobs in protest at his leadership.

But on paper the prime minister is technically safe as Tory leader, and cannot be forcibly ousted under existing Conservative rules.

That is because Mr Johnson has already survived a no-confidence vote last month.

41 per cent of Tory MPs voted against him, but a majority was needed to force him from office.

Under the existing rules, there can now be no new no confidence vote for a year – the matter is officially settled.

The hope by those resigning over the last 24 hours is that Mr Johnson will realise the game is up and resign from his job of his own accord.

But the prime minister has a reputation for brazening-out scandal, so his critics in the Tory party have a back-up plan if it does not voluntarily go.

If Johnson doesn't quit, they will simply change the rules of the game so he can be forced out. They are confident they could win a second no confidence vote.

The Conservative party's ruling 1922 committee executive meets at 4pm on Wednesday, followed by a full meeting of all MPs at 5pm.

The ruling executive is made up of 18 members in total, including six officers. This includes a chairman, two vice chairs, two executive secretaries, and a treasurer.

Existing members of the executive have been lukewarm on the idea of changing the rules because they worry about the precedent it would set.

But the roles are up for re-election, with nominations opening later today. This is because the committee's executive is re-elected every time there is a Queen's Speech.

The first meeting to swear in the new executive would be next Wednesday, with the first opportunity to change the rules the week after that.

This means a vote to oust Mr Johnson could happen before MPs leave Westminster for their summer break on 21 July. MPs critical of Mr Johnson are already organising around changing the rules.

A change could happen even sooner if existing members of the executive decide in the end to change the rules themselves.

It is not clear exactly what the rules would change to, but they would likely be modified in a way that made a new vote of no confidence against the prime minister possible.

Would the vote of no confidence by Tory MPs go a different way to last month? It seems likely. The result for Mr Johnson in June was already poor by the standards of previous leaders, who have resigned out of principle with better levels of support.

But in the last 24 hours MPs who had openly supported the PM have turned against him and said the current situation cannot continue. There will be no shortage of MPs voting against him, even on a pragmatic basis to put and end to the turmoil

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in