Skip Navigation
  • Home
  • Our Work
  • Research & Reports
  • The Constituent-Engagement Effect of Small Donor Public Financing: A Statistical Comparison of City Council (2017) and State Assembly (2018) Fundraising in New York City
Report

The Constituent-Engagement Effect of Small Donor Public Financing: A Statistical Comparison of City Council (2017) and State Assembly (2018) Fundraising in New York City

This spring New York enacted a historic law commit­ting to estab­lish volun­tary public finan­cing for state elec­tions. The governor and legis­lat­ive lead­ers appoin­ted nine commis­sion­ers to design the system by Decem­ber 1. The Commis­sion’s goals are to incentiv­ize candid­ates to seek small dona­tions, reduce pres­sure on them to soli­cit large gifts, and encour­age qual­i­fied candid­ates to run for office. Its work could funda­ment­ally trans­form a polit­ical process domin­ated by big checks and infam­ous for under­min­ing the public’s trust.

This study adds new evid­ence to a body of research that demon­strates small donor public finan­cing is the most effect­ive, proven policy solu­tion to meet the Commis­sion’s goals.

In addi­tion to known bene­fits, this study shows that a small donor public finan­cing system, of the kind New York City has offered candid­ates for city office for decades, incentiv­izes candid­ates to engage many more in-district donors for campaign support, and gives these in-district donors (includ­ing small donors) signi­fic­antly greater finan­cial influ­ence, compared to campaigns where candid­ates do not use small donor public finan­cing.