Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;8(9):873-884.
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30317-9. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

Pulmonary vascular resistance and clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Pulmonary vascular resistance and clinical outcomes in patients with pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective cohort study

Bradley A Maron et al. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep.
Free PMC article

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: In pulmonary hypertension subgroups, elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of 3·0 Wood units or more is associated with poor prognosis. However, the spectrum of PVR risk in pulmonary hypertension is not known. To address this area of uncertainty, we aimed to analyse the relationship between PVR and adverse clinical outcomes in pulmonary hypertension.

Methods: We did a retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing right heart catheterisation (RHC) in the US Veterans Affairs health-care system (Oct 1, 2007-Sep 30, 2016). Patients were included in the analyses if data from a complete RHC and at least 1 year of follow-up were available. Both inpatients and outpatients were included, but individuals with missing mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure, or cardiac output were excluded. The primary outcome measure was time to all-cause mortality assessed by the Veteran Affairs vital status file. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between PVR and outcomes, and the mortality hazard ratio was validated in a RHC cohort from Vanderbilt University Medical Center (Sept 24, 1998-June 1, 2016).

Findings: The primary cohort (N=40 082; 38 751 [96·7%] male; median age 66·5 years [IQR 61·1-73·5]; median follow-up 1153 days [IQR 570-1971]), included patients with a history of heart failure (23 201 [57·9%]) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (13 348 [33·3%]). We focused on patients at risk for pulmonary hypertension based on a mPAP of at least 19 mm Hg (32 725 [81·6%] of 40 082). When modelled as a continuous variable, the all-cause mortality hazard for PVR was increased at around 2·2 Wood units compared with PVR of 1·0 Wood unit. Among patients with a mPAP of at least 19 mm Hg and pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 15 mm Hg or less, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 1·71 (95% CI 1·59-1·84; p<0·0001) and for heart failure hospitalisation was 1·27 (1·13-1·43; p=0·0001), when comparing PVR of 2·2 Wood units or more to less than 2·2 Wood units. The validation cohort (N=3699, 1860 [50·3%] male, median age 60·4 years [49·5-69·2]; median follow-up 1752 days [IQR 1281-2999]) included 2870 patients [77·6%] with mPAP of at least 19 mm Hg (1418 [49·4%] male). The adjusted mortality HR for patients in the mPAP of 19 mm Hg or more group and with PVR of 2·2 Wood units or more and pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 15 mm or less Hg (1221 [42·5%] of 2870) was 1·81 (95% CI 1·33-2·47; p=0·0002).

Interpretation: These data widen the continuum of clinical risk for mortality and heart failure in patients referred for RHC with elevated pulmonary artery pressure to include PVR of around 2.2 Wood units and higher. Testing the generalisability of these findings in at-risk populations with fewer cardiopulmonary comorbidities is warranted.

Funding: None.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality stratified by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure.
From the primary cohort, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality is plotted for PVR 1–6 WU relative to a reference value of 1.0 WU in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥19 mmHg (A). This population was then restricted to PAWP ≤15 mmHg (B) and, alternatively, to PAWP >15 mmHg (C). WU, Wood unit. The grey line inset is the kernel density estimate, representing the relative density of patients across PVR levels.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Time to event plot for unadjusted mortality and heart failure hospitalization-free survival stratified by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) for patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure in the primary cohort.
From the primary cohort, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the probability of all-cause mortality according to PVR ≥2.2 WU vs. <2.2 WU in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥19 mmHg (X2=886.5, P<0.0001) (A). This population was then stratified by PAWP ≤15 mmHg (X2=539.1, P<0.0001) (B) and PAWP >15 mmHg (X2=430.5, P<0.0001) (C). A similar analysis performed for the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure-hospitalization according to PVR ≥2.2 WU vs. <2.2 WU in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥19 mmHg (X2=1019.5, P<0.0001) (D). This population was then stratified by PAWP ≤15 mmHg (X2=578.1, P<0.0001) (E) and PAWP >15 mmHg (X2=559.3, P<0.0001) (F). Results from a log-rank test comparing strata are provided for each analysis. Censoring begins at and beyond 1 year following the index right heart catheterization, represented here as day 0. Number of patients at risk are provided at days 0, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 post-right heart catheterization.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Time to event plot for unadjusted mortality and heart failure hospitalization-free survival stratified by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) for patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure in the primary cohort.
From the primary cohort, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the probability of all-cause mortality according to PVR ≥2.2 WU vs. <2.2 WU in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥19 mmHg (X2=886.5, P<0.0001) (A). This population was then stratified by PAWP ≤15 mmHg (X2=539.1, P<0.0001) (B) and PAWP >15 mmHg (X2=430.5, P<0.0001) (C). A similar analysis performed for the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure-hospitalization according to PVR ≥2.2 WU vs. <2.2 WU in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥19 mmHg (X2=1019.5, P<0.0001) (D). This population was then stratified by PAWP ≤15 mmHg (X2=578.1, P<0.0001) (E) and PAWP >15 mmHg (X2=559.3, P<0.0001) (F). Results from a log-rank test comparing strata are provided for each analysis. Censoring begins at and beyond 1 year following the index right heart catheterization, represented here as day 0. Number of patients at risk are provided at days 0, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000 post-right heart catheterization.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Time to event plot for unadjusted mortality stratified by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) for patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure in the validation cohort.
From the validation cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the probability of all-cause mortality according to PVR ≥2.2 WU vs. <2.2 WU in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥19 mmHg stratified by (A) PAWP ≤15 mmHg (X2=35.2, P<0.0001) and (B) PAWP >15 mmHg (X2=7.5, P=0.0063). Number of patients at risk are provided at 2 year increments post-right heart catheterization.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Time to event plot for unadjusted mortality stratified by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) for patients with elevated pulmonary artery pressure in the validation cohort.
From the validation cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the probability of all-cause mortality according to PVR ≥2.2 WU vs. <2.2 WU in patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥19 mmHg stratified by (A) PAWP ≤15 mmHg (X2=35.2, P<0.0001) and (B) PAWP >15 mmHg (X2=7.5, P=0.0063). Number of patients at risk are provided at 2 year increments post-right heart catheterization.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types