Search results

for favouring functionality over security. He claims Linux Torvalds has said he was not internested in adding security feautres to avoid buffer overflow

translating missing content from French page: servers, embedded devices, and security talk about X and possibly TeX in the history section add better references

example if the OS is unsecure it should be mentioned in a section about Security (with required references of course), not in a "Criticism of..." section

the task is to secure the data in spite of that. Security through obscurity (e.g. hiding your security flaws behind a closed source license) can never

Would a security section be appropriate with maybe a link to [1] secunia.com Linux kernel vulnerabilities? I noticed here and also on the Linux Distribution

reference implementation of this architecture was first integrated into a security-enhanced Linux® prototype system in order to demonstrate the value of flexible

Programming tools TO EXPLOIT THE GRAPHICAL ENVIRONMENT) all at low cost, security and reliability, the lack of which keeps Microsoft in scandals all the

the default configuration of the installed Linux kernel, general system security, and more generally integration of the different software packages into

page containing a list of all kind of Linux applications such as offfice, security, multimedia etc? This makes no sense. There are at least 16,000 Linux applications

was targeted at the US Millitary (or whoever primarily used the faulty security software), and a number of important computers chosen as seeds. —Sean κ

that call GNU/Linux "Linux", usually call people who circumvent computer security as "hackers"; a corruption of the original meaning of the word. Just because

graphical and application level, but they talk about operating systems and security, while they don't reality even talk about that. There never was a GNU/Linux

like software manual, for instance. Kernel technical issues (stability, security, performance): I don't know what are they and I don't really think these

(usually Firefox) gets mentioned of late in the context of Internet Explorer security holes, not in the context of open source per se. (Two more uses of Linux

subsections, "Linux as a server", "Other uses", and then finally "Linux security". I think that some writing about media related to Linux would be good:

of Security section 1 Talk:Linux/Archive 32#Translation of Security section Addition of Security section 1 Talk:Linux/Archive 32#Addition of Security section