Talk:Code42
Code42 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 4, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Code42 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
1 |
Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by MiszaBot I. |
Reviewed for Conflict[edit]
Can't find anything blatantly advertising like or incorrect. Comparing user counts via alexa and compete, it appears they are more relevant than many providers listed in wikipedia.
I modeled this article based on the format and content used in the currently posted article about Backblaze. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backblaze
Not sure what is missing in the CrashPlan article that makes it a candidate for removal. Please offer specific suggestions about what needs to be changed.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariecrashplan (talk • contribs)
Cleanup request[edit]
{{request edit}} There was previously a separate article on the company's software Crashplan and in the merge things got a little mixed up. A lot of the content became redundant, poor grammar, etc. I would like to propose the following:
- Delete the Reviews section. I don't think it makes sense to have it now that the article is focused on the company.
- Delete the software infobox. It's crowding the article, which already has a company infobox. Also, most of the info in the box is repeated elsewhere.
- Replace the Software and Features sections with a couple paragraphs (leaving the Reception section in). This section got muddled up in the merge and became over-sized and redundant. Just a couple paragraphs about the products should be all that's needed.
Proposed Crashplan section (to replace Software and services & Features)
| ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mapped drives[edit]continuation of truncated edit summary: one of the citations doesn't seem to mention mapped drives, one is dead and one is ambiguous, but from crashplan support page cited for the workaround and the citation I've given it's clear that the issue is being unable to backup mapped drives, not backup to them. I think the statement about competitors being able to do that should probably be removed as it's not in any of the citations either, but I'll leave it for a bit in case anyone wants to add a citation. GoddersUK (talk) 16:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Per the discussion above, I'd like to request we remove the sentence at the very end of the Reception section about mapped drives. It was most probably me that added it originally, however thanks to user:GoddersUK second look, we discovered only one of the three sources I used actually mention it and only in passing. CorporateM (Talk) 19:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Done I'd been going to do this after our earlier conversation and never got around to it. GoddersUK (talk) 09:50, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Updates[edit]
I would like to request an editor consider some proposed updates located at User:CorporateM/Code42 to incorporate new sources that have been published since I brought the page up to GA last year and trim a few unnecessary primary source. The draft includes bolded text for additions and strikeouts for trims. Thanks in advance for taking a look! CorporateM (Talk) 10:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Update Key People[edit]
BerkshireQueen14 (talk) 19:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)BerkshireQueen14 References
Update Key People[edit]
BerkshireQueen14 (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2022 (UTC) |
- Wikipedia good articles
- Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class Apple Inc. articles
- Low-importance Apple Inc. articles
- WikiProject Apple Inc. articles
- GA-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/03 November 2012
- Accepted AfC submissions
- GA-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- GA-Class software articles
- GA-Class software articles of Low-importance
- Low-importance software articles
- GA-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- GA-Class Minnesota articles
- Low-importance Minnesota articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Implemented requested edits