This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Scheduled event (July 17 - Planned launch of NASA's Mars 2020 mission) contradicts with cited source[edit]
On NASA's website it is said that the launch window is scheduled between July the 22th and August the 11th, yet on Scheduled it is written that the launch is scheduled for July the 17th. I want to fix that, but I don't know if the launch window should be written on there or a single date, since every other event on that article is a single date.
The statement that "2020 has been a highly disruptive year that has been heavily defined by the COVID-19 pandemic and Death of Chadwick Boseman, which has led to global social and economic disruption, mass cancellations and postponements of events, worldwide lockdowns, worldwide protests, and the largest economic recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s." seems inappropriate at best, and an act of vandalism at worst.
There is no equivalence between the COVID-19 pandemic and the Death of Chadwick Boseman. And that's aside from the fact that none of the things it "has led to" can actually be attributed to his death.
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. Not convinced this meets criteria, the paper chain hasn't closed. Feel free to discuss further here though Cannolis (talk) 05:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, this should be added to an article because even though it is US, it mostly affects other countries and affect the quality of the year, so this should be added to this page. It is fact that it should include shift to digital and falling circulation. And how does it not meet the consensus? --2601:205:C002:D1E0:D11:AA22:BE7:46C1 (talk) 05:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain how it affects other countries. Deb (talk) 07:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The first thing I did was look at that, but I don't think that it establishes the level of international significance you're suggesting. There are plenty of news services in other countries that cover US news but that doesn't establish international notability either. Deb (talk) 08:25, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]