Permanently protected template

Template:Admin dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Shortcut

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 83
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 35
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 37
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 7
Wikipedia fully-protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia requested edits 170
Requested RD1 redactions 6
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 14
Open sockpuppet investigations 67
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

All Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons
Wikipedia pages tagged for copyright problems
Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues
Backlog templates
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia talk:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

Firstly, these edits were disrupted by Archives908, with reverting on older version with obsolete stats. --78.109.68.79 (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 2
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 7
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 0
Other candidates 5
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 6 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 49 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – No backlog currently
Requested RD1 redactions – 7 items
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcut


Bolera

Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. TheHotwiki (talk) 07:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected – 2 months. A Lot of IPs have been making unsourced changes. EdJohnston (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Khokhar

Reason: Constant edit warring by newly created SPA who is only interested in inserting "Jat" there. I request for increase in protection level of the page. This is even after explaining the SPA on talk page about reliable references and poorly questionable reference.RS6784 (talk) 12:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Attack on Snake Island

Pending review - Reason: Events being reported lead to disruptive edits by some newly created accounts and other editors. Mr.User200 (talk) 13:13, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Help desk

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Personal attack LTA. Protecting the Help Desk talk page shouldn't cause as many issues as protecting the main Help Desk since it isn't used as often (if protection is decided to be needed) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:47, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 13:59, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
ALright then. I Guess we'll just have to see if it's a persistent problem or if it's an "Every once in a while thing". ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

XXXTentacion discography

Reason: IPs have been quite insistent on violating WP:MUG these last couple days. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 13:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Nivedita Menon

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article was protected previously for a month but is still being vandalized due to a recent controversy surrounding The Kashmir Files movie and her portrayal. Better if it is protected for a longer period. USaamo (t@lk) 14:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

User talk:Itcouldbepossible

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please protect my talk page for atleast 6 months. If you see the edit history, then you will find out that this page is the target of many vandals and bunches of LTAs are behind me. So please do the necessary. Regards, ItcouldbepossibleTalk 14:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

SurrealEstate

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors. livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

I dunno, the last anonymous edits before this were in January. I don’t think one COPYVIO edit series is enough to say it’s persistent and disruptive. I think it’d need to be more numerous and concentrated CreecregofLife (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Jarrett Stidham

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content after reports of a signing. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:The LivinGrimoire

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Fade258 (talk) 15:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Horse racing

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. lol1VNIO[not Lol1VNIO] (I made a mistake? talk to me • contribs) 15:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Black Panther: Wakanda Forever

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Osman I

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruption in May. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Jakov Sedlar

Reason: Some months back the page was semi-protected after continuous IP disruption/removal of sourced content. After the latest protection expired, a new IP emerges removing content. Griboski (talk) 16:55, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Among Us

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. There have been very few constructive edits from non-autoconfirmed users to this article. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Dhar Mann

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP vandalism over the past few months. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:29, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcut


Rick Sanchez (journalist)

Reason: the protection is no longer necessary because it hasn't been touched for over a decade, citations are littered with dead links and it should be updated Davetheirishguy (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

@Davetheirishguy. The page was protected in December 2016 due to persistent violations of our BLP policy. There have been no edits by IPs since then because the page is semi-protected but there have been dozens of edits by auto-confirmed users. You are auto-confirmed so are able to update the dead links if you are so inclined. Nevertheless, pinging Drmies for your input please. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Malcolmxl5, I don't know. Hit or miss. If you unprotect and the BLP-violating vampires return, we'll protect it again, but it certainly was distasteful. Drmies (talk) 00:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
@Drmies. Actually, looking at the history more closely, the BLP violation was restored in September 2017 until Davetheirishguy removed it yesterday saying the citations were dead links. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
yes, that is correct, I took them out, the Miami Herald and Sun-Sentinel articles that were cited were links to "Page Not Found" messages, not even archived or paywalled articles. Davetheirishguy (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Malcolmx15, I see that now--thanks. "restore DUI incident, see talk page" is kind of crappy, particularly without anything other than one comment from a different editor. Very disappointing. Davetheirishguy, thanks. Drmies (talk) 13:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Remove file prefix (request) 2022-05-10 18:26 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
File:Flag of the United States.svg (request) 2022-05-12 15:55 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:23, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
7 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Wikipedia:Signpost/Template:Cover-item (request) 2022-04-24 20:41 Template-protected (log) Modified by Hut 8.5 on 2016-12-22: "Highly visible template: 20000+ transclusions"
Template:Inflation/fn (request) 2022-04-30 07:25 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2020-08-29: "High-risk template"
Template:Infobox artist discography (request) 2022-05-02 20:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fish and karate on 2018-02-22: "Highly visible template: 5k+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox musical artist (request) 2022-05-04 17:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Interlanguage link (request) 2022-05-07 22:50 Template-protected (log) From Template:Interlanguage link multi: Protected by The Earwig on 2015-12-14: "Highly visible template: over 15,000 mainspace transclusions"
Template:College (request) 2022-05-12 04:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Module:String2 (request) 2022-05-12 15:31 Template-protected (log) Protected by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "Highly visible template"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:50, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request • view requests)

User:NeverTry4Me

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 07:11, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Though I was blocked for a few days, 2 months before, since then I am successful with AFC submission. Who else than users like me, will understand how to create articles eligible for Wikipedia? I am asking for a probationary period of 15 days.- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 07:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]) and has created roughly 16 articles. — MusikBot talk 07:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@MusikAnimal so what? Eligibility depends on hard work, not by automated tools. Wikipedia:Autopatrolled says " A suggested standard is the prior creation of 25 valid articles, not including redirects or disambiguation pages, but the right is not normally given to very new editors regardless of the number of articles created."
Hence, I have requested after thoroughly studying the Wikipedia:Autopatrolled rules. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 07:40, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
NeverTry4Me, checking XTools, I see 15 articles created by you, six of which have been deleted so we can only really consider the nine undeleted ones. You are aware that the suggested standard is 25 articles: why are you applying for this user right at this point? Girth Summit (blether) 09:13, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Girth Summit I have applied because now I have realized and understood (after my AFC submission accepted) how AFC works. However, I honor your decision as well as others' decision. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 09:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 Not done The threshold for autopatrolled is very different than having an article accepted at AfC. What we would be looking for is a long track-record of creating articles that not only don't get deleted, but which have no substantial issues with them which need to be addressed by other editors. Thank you for your contributions so far, but I'm declining this for now, and I would advise against reapplying until you have written at least 25 articles (not including any that get deleted). Girth Summit (blether) 10:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Girth Summit Thank you. I will re-apply after 90 days. :) - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 14:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@NeverTry4Me: Just to reiterate what Girth Summit said, please do not reapply until you meet the minimum requirements, 90 days or not. They are minimum requirements and we only waive them in exceptional cases. It's also very unlikely you'll be granted autopatrolled if you have any more articles deleted. – Joe (talk) 14:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Joe Roe by 90 days, I will complete more than 30 AFC submisssions accepted. I am confident. Wish me luck. :) - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 14:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
I'm wondering whether you understand what Autopatrolled does - it has nothing to do with AfC submissions. You don't need to go through AfC - unless you're under an editing restriction I'm unaware of, you can already create articles directly. Autopatrolled is about bypassing the NPP review process, which is quite different. Girth Summit (blether) 14:57, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Girth Summit: The applicant is under unblock conditions (not listed at WP:RESTRICT) that mandate use of AfC. @NeverTry4Me: You are applying for many permissions that are inappropriate for you: rollback while acknowledging you cannot do antivandalism work, page mover, and new page reviewer. Please concentrate on something other than requesting permissions. Sdrqaz (talk) 10:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Thankyou, Sdrqaz - I was unaware of that. NeverTry4Me - that you made a request for the autopatrolled permission without mentioning the unblock conditions that you agreed to is concerning. You cannot be given a permission such as autopatrolled until such time as your editing restriction is rescinded - your first recourse would be to speak to the admin who unblocked you about that (courtesy ping to Deepfriedokra), but given that it was only put in place two months ago I would advise you to hold off until September at the earliest. Girth Summit (blether) 11:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
NeverTry4Me is doing much better in many ways, but I think this would be to early. Keep up the good work, but not at this time on the permission. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Petewarrior

I have created 26 articles so far, and it would be great to have the next ones appearing on search engines more quickly. PetéWarrior (talk) 11:18, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Not a regular here, but is that the purpose of autopatrolled? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
@Deepfriedokra: More of a side-effect: new pages are marked as {{NOINDEX}}, telling search engine crawlers to ignore them, until they're patrolled or for 90 days (whichever is first). – Joe (talk) 12:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation

Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request • view requests)

User:Kageneko

I would like to update https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kharkiv#Twin_towns_%E2%80%93_sister_cities according to news about the changes to this list (https://suspilne.media/238139-harkiv-rozirvav-pobratimski-vidnosini-z-rosijskimi-mistami/), but the article is semi-protected and I need to have confirmed user rights to do so Kageneko (talk) 11:06, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

 Done OK, but it's really because you are going to be autoconfirmed on your next edit. Be sure to edit with care. — xaosflux Talk 15:24, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Requests for file mover

File mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request • view requests)

User:TheAafi

Hi, I majorly edit English Wikipedia and would like to help with renaming files as well. I'm already a file-mover and a license-reviewer on the Commons. I am well aware of the renaming guidelines and policies and have thoroughly been through WP:FMV. If my skills can be of use at this Wiki as well, I'd be glad to help. Regards, ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request • view requests)

User:Ingenuity

I'd like to help out with the new pages backlog. I first requested this permission a few months ago (my username was Wgullyn at the time) and was asked to reapply in a few months. Since then I've become an AFC reviewer and gained a lot more experience with CSDs. I have read through the new pages patrol tutorial and understand the requirements. Thanks, >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 19:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

@Ingenuity: I will let someone else make the final decision on whether it should be granted, but I think that some of your A1s in particular are not good enough, with Christopher C. Doyle being nowhere near. There needs to be some improvement with that criterion – it is being used far too loosely. Please take some time to re-read it – the title comes into play too. Ryan reffell (the content was "Ryan Reffell Actor" and a photo) was not a G11; Richard Y. Kim (content was the title and a website) being a G11 was a stretch; Matthew Matera should not have been tagged as an A7 (as a member of two notable bands). Sdrqaz (talk) 04:07, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Akevsharma

for me right was granted for one month probation, I would like to continue. Akevsharma (talk) 00:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Mako001

I've been an active RC patroller for a few months now and have got some AfC experience, and I'd like to expand my horizons into the new page feed. I've messed up enough CSD's to know how it works, and have a decent amount of AfD experience. I also have some experience with copyvios, and requesting the necessary action on those. I have familiarised myself with the workflow (and the whole process in general) for NPP, and often bear it in mind when viewing drafts, newly created articles and other pages in general.

If there is anything else that the reviewing admin would like to know, please don't hesitate to ask. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:11, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request • view requests)

User:Blizzythesnowman

I request for the page mover rights for the sole purpose of moving Ricardo Mayorga vs. Oscar De La Hoya to Oscar De La Hoya vs. Ricardo Mayorga. Why? Because the order of fighters are wrong. In the official fight poster, it is arranged as De La Hoya vs. Mayorga, with De La Hoya being written first. BlizzyBlizz (talk) 11:54, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

You can open a move request following the WP:RM process for this, you don't need page mover permissions to open move requests. Iffy★Chat -- 15:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request • view requests)

User:Toad40

Hello! I would like to request the pending changes reviewer right to review changes on pages. I have read everything on this page section "Becoming a reviewer.". I hope you can accept my request, have a good day! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Becoming_a_reviewer Toad40 (talk) 03:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

 Request withdrawn I might ask later, but for now I don't want Pending changes reviewer permissions. Toad40 (talk) 18:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Cranloa12n

I believe I have a reasonable track record of editing, with around ~600 edits. I am familiar with the basic content policies. I remove unsourced materials (check contribs). I want to help clear the backlog. I think I am a good candidate for this right. Cranloa12n / talk / contribs / 04:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Kilaseell

Just to put it simply: I think that i'd be good for the role :) Cheers! Kilaseell - Message me! - 15:51, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 16 days. — MusikBot talk 16:00, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Mr Reading Turtle

I have made nearly 200 edits in the main space and 900 plus total. I revert vandalism with WikiLoop Doublecheck almost every day. I have respond to semi-protected edit requests. All of these things, in my opinion, show that I have the maturity, experience, and knowledge on Wikipedia to become a pending changes reviewer. Please note that I accidentally marked my previous request as not done when referencing something. 𝕸𝖗 𝕽𝖊𝖆𝖉𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕿𝖚𝖗𝖙𝖑𝖊 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦 (talk) 22:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2][3]). — MusikBot talk 22:31, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Sideswipe9th

I'd like to request pending changes reviewer please, a handful of pages on my watch list are pending pages protected, and I believe I can help out by reviewing those requests as they come through. I have read the instructions, and I believe I have a reasonable track record as an editor who is comfortable and confident with recognising vandalism. Thanks. Sideswipe9th (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add request • view requests)

User:Amadeus1999

Hello! I frequently use pseudo-rollback for CV edits and copyvio reversion, and I've read at several locations like Huggle that the rollback with permission is (a lot) quicker, especially on larger/bigger pages, and seeing as I have way too many user scripts and gadgets turned on, this would really help as it frequently frustrates me to have to wait for the pseudo-rollbacks to roll through. Appreciate any feedback and consideration. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 17:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]) and has 156 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 02:40, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
I'd like to add that I have near 1000 edits, but a lot of them are reverted and not noted because for example copyright revdels are completed, etc. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 20:14, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
@Amadeus1999: Am I correct in understanding that your primary usecase for Rollback is reverting copyright violations? --Blablubbs (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
@Blablubbs: Hey, thanks for your response. No, that's not quite correct, I would use Rollback primarily for counter-vandalism and disruptive editing, my bad for not including it. A lot of my edits should reflect this too. The copyright violation stuff would be a secondary use case, I'm not sure why I wrote that primarily during the request for permission, brain fart I guess haha. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 01:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
@Blablubbs and Fastily: Courtesy pings as my request may have been forgotten. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 22:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Your account is still pretty new (< 1 month), and I declined your last request ~2 weeks ago. For the record, rollback won't help you perform reverts faster than Twinkle would (not that you should be trying to go faster anyways). Given your relatively low number of contributions to the mainspace, I encourage you to spend some time actually editing Wikipedia (i.e. engaging in non-CVU activities) before applying for advanced permissions. -FASTILY 20:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
@Fastily: Not to be disrespectful but have you actually read my edit history at all? There's lots of non-CVU stuff in there... Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 03:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Unfortunately, yes. Looking at your talk page, you're clearly still learning about how Wikipedia works, and you also (incorrectly) indicated above that rollback is for reverting copyright violations. I'd rather not nitpick anymore than I already have, so let's just say that I'm not convinced you're ready for this tool. -FASTILY 03:32, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Could I request a WP:3O from another admin? I don't mean to force my way through here, I just really think it's not right and you lack proper arguments (in my eyes). Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 04:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 Not done. Please see the notice at the top of this page. With only 156 edits to the mainspace, I don't think you have sufficient editing experience yet. Take a moment to check out what counter-vandalism is at WP:CVU, and if you decide you'd like to get involved, you can enroll at the Counter Vandalism Academy to learn more. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:08, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

User:CollectiveSolidarity

I have worked on honing my vandalism skills since my last request, but I would like to use this to access Huggle in order to improve them some more. I have been using Twinkle's rollback to revert edits, and I have been leaving warnings behind whenever I spot vandalism. However, I must disclose that I sometimes do not leave warnings when it might instead be disruptive editing. I leave a link to policy in edit summaries instead. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([5]). — MusikBot talk 00:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, but that's not good enough. Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. If you are reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor; I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or RedWarn which makes this very easy. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. -FASTILY 02:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 Request withdrawn My apologies for my intrusion. I will not bother this page again. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 03:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Taxin609

So I have confession to make. I'm addicted. For about the past week I've spent a good portion of my days at work looking at the recent changes page. Reverting vandalism has sort of become a new hobby in a way, I guess my OCD to make things look right has finally come in handy. I am very interested in continuing to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism and this tool would make it a lot easier. If anyone has any questions, comments or concerns please feel free to reach me on my talk page.Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 20:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC) Taxin609 (Talk To Me) 20:10, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

 Not done I see you created an account less than 2 weeks ago. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend some time gaining more experience contributing to Wikipedia (i.e. engaging in non-CVU activities) before assigning you advanced permissions. Thanks, FASTILY 20:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

User:Carpathianflorist

Hi, I'm back. I've done much more antivandal since my last time here, become efficienter in warnings and done stuff outside of antivandalism (removing uncited info). Therefore, [6]. ~ carpathianflorist 15:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Unrelated but clicking that link was somewhat scary, I'll admit. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 15:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([7][8]). — MusikBot talk 15:44, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Admin_dashboard&oldid=1056199491"