Opens profile photo
Follow
House Judiciary Dems
@HouseJudiciary
Proudly working to protect and defend the safety, privacy, consumer rights, civil rights and civil liberties of all Americans. Chairman ⚖
Washington, D.C.judiciary.house.govJoined February 2011

House Judiciary Dems’s Tweets

Congress must reform the National Emergencies Act to ensure that future abuse will not occur. Otherwise, as Senators Church and Mathias warned almost 50 years ago, “the unmistakable drift toward [a] one-[person] government will continue.” 6/6
4
26
Show this thread
The bottom line: If the president declares an emergency and Congress does not like it, either Congress must convince the president to terminate their own emergency declaration or gather a veto-proof majority in Congress, which is very difficult to muster. 5/
1
3
16
Show this thread
The danger of unfettered executive power triggered by an emergency declaration has been a longstanding problem across administrations of both parties. Presently, a supermajority in Congress is required to stop the president from abusing this power. 4/
1
1
5
Show this thread

Topics to follow

Sign up to get Tweets about the Topics you follow in your Home timeline.

Carousel

Even more problematic is that the president does not need to show any relationship between the declared emergency and the statutory provision being invoked. Instead, the president is essentially given carte blanche freedom to act once an emergency is declared. 3/
1
1
6
Show this thread
There are least 123 distinct statutory provisions available to the president when invoking the National Emergencies Act. Provisions include the ability to test biological and chemical agents on humans and the ability to take over communications networks. 2/
1
2
6
Show this thread
Since 1976 when Congress passed the National Emergencies Act, US Presidents have declared the existence of 75 national emergencies. Of those 75 declarations, over 40 remain in effect. For nearly five decades this country has been in some form of a state of emergency. 1/
Examining Potential Reforms of Emergency Powers
5
18
30
Show this thread
The Buffalo shooter's beliefs in the "great replacement theory" are not from an obscure corner of the internet. They are beliefs held by today's Republicans. Hateful rhetoric has consequences and goes against everything we stand for as Americans.
Embedded video
2:11
24.3K views
162
406
834
All workers deserve & should expect basic workplace rights protecting them from harassment, discrimination & other misconduct. That federal judiciary employees are denied these basic rights is just flat wrong & must be remedied. We must pass the Judiciary Accountability Act NOW!
Quote Tweet
These survey results are appalling (but, sadly, not surprising) and demand reform, including @RepHankJohnson's Judiciary Accountability Act, which would provide 30,000 federal judiciary employees with rights & protections against discrimination, sexual harassment, & retaliation. twitter.com/amarimow/statu…
Show this thread
1
11
30
"The American people have good reason to question the legitimacy of this unrepresentative, unaccountable institution." explains how the Supreme Court has been undermined in recent years by the actions of the justices themselves.
Embedded video
1:57
657 views
5
46
80
Despite recent ethical lapses on the Supreme Court including Justice Thomas’s refusal to recuse himself from a case regarding his wife’s involvement in #Jan6th activities, every Republican voted against creating a commonsense ethics standard for our nation’s highest court.
“It is shocking that any member of Congress would be opposed to strengthening the integrity of the Supreme Court by asking the Court to create a code of ethics that is consistent with those followed by other public officials.” - Chairman Jerry Nadler
27
142
209
Show this thread
NEW: Today passed legislation to address the growing and persistent ethics crisis at our nation’s highest court by requiring the Supreme Court to create a code of conduct that would apply to both the justices and their employees.
22
95
225
Show this thread
The Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act will protect the judicial process from hidden conflicts of interest, safeguard litigants’ right to equal justice under law, and ensure justices of the Supreme Court are not above the laws they are entrusted to enforce. 5/5
3
30
137
Show this thread
Recent events—whether it be the unprecedented leak of a draft opinion, speeches given at closed-door events with parties to ongoing cases in front of the Court, or public appearances with political figures—all call out for scrutiny under a defined code of ethics. 3/
4
24
121
Show this thread
We expect the justices of our nation’s highest court to hold themselves to the highest standards of ethical conduct, but, in fact, their conduct too often falls below the standards that most other government officials are required to follow. 1/
Image
20
175
388
Show this thread
Next up: The TBI and PTSD Law Enforcement Training Act, a bipartisan bill that would require to develop tools for law enforcement agencies so that they can equip officers to respond to individuals with traumatic brain injuries and post-traumatic stress disorder.
3
6
18