User talk:Peter Ormond

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palladium jubilee (September 14)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedias and fansites are not acceptable or reliable sources. The Cambridge Dictionary doesn't mention a 'palladium jubilee'.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Peter Ormond! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II (November 16)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Unbroken Chain was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm not sure that this merits an article but what I am sure of is that the phrase "It was better known as her "annus horribilis" - one of the most difficult periods of her reign – as her chidren’s marriages were in tatters and public opinion turned against the Royals" is a direct quote adding the word family doesn't change that.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Unbroken Chain (talk) 01:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II has a new comment[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 11:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi Peter Ormond! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not a huge Royals or royalty person, but Queen Elizabeth II's Jubilees are typically fairly notable since even someone like myself, who doesn't go out of their way to consume media about them has heard of it. I left a message on the royalty WikiProject, which focuses on royalty related articles on Wikipedia, about the article and yourself. Hopefully someone can help you flesh it out! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II has been accepted[edit]

AFC-Logo.svg
Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Unbroken Chain (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Peter Ormond, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Ruby Jubilee of Elizabeth II have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a Barnstar![edit]

Content Creativity Barnstar.png The Content Creativity Barnstar
For diligent work on the new article: Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II. AussieWikiDan (talk) 05:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! It means a lot. Peter Ormond (talk) 08:48, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palladium jubilee (January 12)[edit]

AFC-Logo Decline.svg
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:
This topic likely results from [[WP:CITOGENESIS citogenesis]], and references should be found before this topic was mentioned on Wikipedia, in this case May 2019.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Zoozaz1 talk 13:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings![edit]

I stumbled across this...[1] and can't quite think how to factor it into the article that you've worked so hard on. All the best! No Swan So Fine (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added. Check if it is fine. Thank you. :) Peter Ormond (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks wonderful, thank you. I like the new title, it's an unofficial/official concept anyway! No Swan So Fine (talk) 10:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Glad you like it. :) Peter Ormond (talk) 11:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a barnstar![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
For continued excellence in the editing of the article regarding the Death and funeral of Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. XxLuckyCxX (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Peter Ormond (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Monarchy of Pakistan[edit]

Original Barnstar.png The Original Barnstar
This is a superb article. Thank you so much for making Wikipedia better. ◦ Trey Maturin 17:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Trey Maturin: Thanks a ton! It means a lot. 😊 Peter Ormond 💬 21:21, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP out of control, since Aug 18, 2021[edit]

You may want to review the IP's multiple changes to the List of titles and honours of George VI article. GoodDay (talk) 04:04, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GoodDay:  Done. Thanks for the notice. :) Peter Ormond 💬 04:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coming attraction[edit]

In the future, we'll need an RFC covering all the 'former' monarchy articles that had Elizabeth II as their only monarch. Basically a re-do of the August 2021 RFC, only with Barbados added. Gotta get'em in sync, be it Monarchy of country or Queen of country. I don't really care which, just as long as 'one' is adopted for all of them. GoodDay (talk) 05:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The RM at Monarchy of Barbados has been closed as no move, which goes opposite of the August 2021 RM. It's likely that the RM at Queen of Nigeria will be closed as no move, which goes along with the August 2021 RM. These two articles-in-question are basically the same articles - monarchies that had (will have) only 'one' monarch. So, why are we getting different results? Scratching my head, over the likely different outcomes. GoodDay (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think the August 2021 RM should be again opened. And if an independent monarchy existed in that country before, then parenthetical disambiguation of years (e.g. Monarchy of Nigeria (1960–1963)) should be used for the Elizabethan monarchy. Peter Ormond 💬 05:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, also Monarchy of Fiji needs to be split into two articles. GoodDay (talk) 05:42, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I think it should be split into Tui Viti and Monarchy of Fiji (1970–1987). The content about Cakobau's reign is not so great, so I don't think it deserves a stand-alone monarchy article. It could be mentioned at Tui Viti. The Elizabethan monarchy could be covered at Monarchy of Fiji (1970–1987). Also, the Fijian chiefs still recognising The Queen as Tui Viti even after the 1987 coup, can also be covered at Tui Viti. Peter Ormond 💬 05:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. GoodDay (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Holy smokes, I think my big plea on November 4, got the ball rolling for the Nigerian monarchy article's name. Congrats, now 'many more' to go :) GoodDay (talk) 17:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of Sierra Leone and Queen of Tanganyika are ready for a move. Peter Ormond 💬 17:43, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're not alone[edit]

Not sure if it'll help. But, I went through a nervous breakdown that lasted for two months. If you look at my contribs history (this year) you'll know 'when'. Among my many phobias is my 'mortality'. Being an atheist, it's something that can be overwhelming. GoodDay (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, all the very best to you. WP (although it can be frustrating) is to a degree a community. We become acquainted here and there. Take it easy. Errantius (talk) 13:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Diamond Jubilee of Elizabeth II and Golden Jubilee of Elizabeth II[edit]

Content you added to the above articles appears to have been copied from the BBC website and the Government of Saint Lucia website, neither of which are released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, most of the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Could you email me the thing which you removed from Golden Jubilee of Elizabeth II. Thank you. Peter Ormond 💬 21:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
YGM— Diannaa (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:State visit by Elizabeth II to Saudi Arabia has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: You can see I have got copyright problems for some of my edits. I haven't got a high proficiency in English, so I cannot completely write the text in my own words. Please tell me who to turn to on Wikipedia for help. Also, please email me the full source of the draft as it appeared at 21:02 revision. Peter Ormond 💬 21:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Content has to be written in your own words and not include any wording from the source material. One thing I find that works for me is to read over the source material and then pretend I am verbally describing the topic to a friend in my own words. Stuff should also be presented in a different order where possible. Summarize rather than paraphrase. This will typically result in your version being much shorter than the source document. There's some reading material on this topic at Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing and/or have a look at the material at Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own Words. Check out the links in the menu on the left for some exercises to try. Or study this module aimed at WikiEd students.
Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia, not even temporarily for editing. Please do your amendments before you save the page, or use an external editor such as Microsoft Word or Google Docs and work on it there until you are sure it's completely original. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 23:48, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How should communication work in the Wikipedia Android app?[edit]

Hi!

You are getting this message because you are a user of the Wikipedia Android app and have edited Wikipedia through the app. We are working on notifications in the app. This is important because it helps others to contact you to help you or discuss something with you. If you are interested and have time, we would be very interested in your feedback on how to best improve communication in the app. You can answer our survey on mediawiki.org or in Google Forms.

Thank you. For the Android team, Johan (WMF).

17:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for visiting the Guest Room![edit]

Strawberry Icee.jpg

I hope you enjoyed your stay in my Guest Room.
Here is a refreshing Icee as a thank you, complimentary.
Visiting my Guest Room also means you've gained a new talk page watcher!
––FormalDude Emojione 1F427.svg talk 07:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of prime ministers of Elizabeth II[edit]

Not sure how to handle Barbados, in that article. GoodDay (talk) 05:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Check if it's fine. Peter Ormond 💬 06:18, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Australian and Canadian GGs[edit]

Hi, Peter Ormond, I took the Canadian GG out of the G20 box, but left the Australian in, because of the Australian head of state dispute. I personally don't know enough about the Australian situation to comment, so I left it in. Will be interesting to see if anyone responds to either of our deletions. ;) Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 18:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr Serjeant Buzfuz! It was decided by an RfC that we should refer to The Queen as head of state of Australia, on Wikipedia. :) Peter Ormond 💬 18:51, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I was not aware of that, thank you! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 19:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if an RFC is required, concerning categories & sub-categories. But, I'm planning on one, as many of the commonwealth realm governors-general have 'head of state of their countries' in such categories & sub-categories. I was reverted by an editor at the governors-general of Australia category, for example. GoodDay (talk) 21:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We already have the 2016 RfC concerning Australia, and there is no "head of state dispute" in any other Commonwealth realm. So, I don't think there's a need for any new RfC. I suggest you should start the work in Categories and Sub-categories. Peter Ormond 💬 21:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Peter & @Mr Serjeant Buzfuz:, I agree. But, editor StAnselm, appears to resist. GoodDay (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
StAnselm says, "POV edit which would require consensus." Tell him of the already established consensus.[2] Peter Ormond 💬 22:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He doesn't think the categories & sub-categories are covered by it. PS - You'll note, he's one of the 'tiny few' who were against the Australian monarch being described as Australia's head of state, in the 2016 RFC. GoodDay (talk) 22:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They you may open a new RfC regarding categories & sub-categories. But I think it's entirely unnecessary and a waste of time. Peter Ormond 💬 22:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you, that it would be a waste of time. PS - You can speak to him if you want, to avoid the headache. I've just contacted him, second ago. GoodDay (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've completed the removals from the categories. GoodDay (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for that! :) Peter Ormond 💬 03:23, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Centenary Telegram article[edit]

Hey there! Sorry if I stepped on any toes doing a rough copyedit of the Royal Centenary Telegram article, I didn't see you meant to expand on it until after I submitted my changes. Best of luck, I'm excited to see what you do with it! ItsMackie (talk) 21:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undid good faith edits[edit]

Hi, I've just undone some of your page moves from last month at Government House (British Columbia) et al. Canadian buildings, like those in the United States, but unlike those in other Commonwealth countries, use parenthetical disambiguation in the title. Thanks! 162 etc. (talk) 22:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings[edit]

Season's Greetings 2021.jpg Season's Greetings
Here's wishing you a marvellous holiday and the best of 2022 Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Happy Holidays and have a healthy and prosperous new year. Peter Ormond 💬 01:34, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Indian Air Force[edit]

Can you please check for any errors in the article Royal Indian Air Force (if not removed). Cookersweet (talk) 18:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg So nice of you to help me! Utkarsh555 (talk) 09:56, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Utkarsh555: My pleasure! Peter Ormond 💬 11:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hey PO, I saw you created Category:1962 disestablishments in Tanganyika using the autopopulate template; that template adds the cat you created to other categories, two of which do not exist. Do you plan to create those additional two categories (and additional ones that they may be in once created), or do you expect other editors to do tht work? Thanks in in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:26, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@UnitedStatesian: Check the cats now. Peter Ormond 💬 15:36, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All look good, thank you so much. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Commonwealth Mace[edit]

Hello, Peter Ormond. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Commonwealth Mace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:24, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg Thank you very much for help!

Love + Respect from India! (6 days prior to my own B'Day😁) Utkarsh555 (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and happy birthday in advance! Peter Ormond 💬 04:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth Barnstar[edit]

Commonwealth barnstar.png The Commonwealth Barnstar of Merit
Completed this forgotten barnstar in order to present it to you in recognition of your extensive contributions to the article for the Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II. These are greatly appreciated. thorpewilliam (talk) 04:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Thorpewilliam: Thank you so much, friend! I'm greatly humbled and grateful to you for this recognition. I will continue to make good contributions to Commonwealth-related articles as I have been doing since I joined this encyclopedia. I thank you from a full heart. ❤ Peter Ormond 💬 08:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Peter Ormond You're welcome, mate! Glad to hear you'll keep it up. thorpewilliam (talk) 10:08, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NI Flag[edit]

Would you like to comment at Talk:Big Jubilee Read#Flags, as you added the flags? PamD 10:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hospitality Club on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:32, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment[edit]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Anti-Armenian sentiment in Azerbaijan on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Opening Ceremony 2016 - Scottish Parliament- 2nd July 2016 (4).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Opening Ceremony 2016 - Scottish Parliament- 2nd July 2016 (4).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LucasKannou (talk) 20:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Opening Ceremony 2016 - Scottish Parliament- 2nd July 2016 (3).jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Opening Ceremony 2016 - Scottish Parliament- 2nd July 2016 (3).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LucasKannou (talk) 20:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:British Overseas Territories[edit]

Your view would be appreciated in the section titled Police and Enforcement here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:British_Overseas_Territories#Police_and_Enforcement --Dreddmoto (talk) 00:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Peter_Ormond&oldid=1087365946"