Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 1.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13964. Online ahead of print.

Relationships between work-environment characteristics and behavioral health provider burnout in the Veterans Health Administration

Affiliations

Relationships between work-environment characteristics and behavioral health provider burnout in the Veterans Health Administration

Kara Zivin et al. Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify work-environment characteristics associated with Veterans Health Administration (VHA) behavioral health provider (BHP) burnout among psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers.

Data sources: The 2015-2018 data from Annual All Employee Survey (AES); Mental Health Provider Survey (MHPS); N = 57,397 respondents; facility-level Mental Health Onboard Clinical (MHOC) staffing and productivity data, N = 140 facilities.

Study design: For AES and MHPS separately, we used mixed-effects logistic regression to predict BHP burnout using surveys from year pairs (2015-2016, 2016-2017, 2017-2018; six models). Within each year-pair, we used the earlier year of data to train models and tested the model in the later year, with burnout (emotional exhaustion and/or depersonalization) as the outcome for each survey. We used potentially modifiable work-environment characteristics as predictors, controlling for employee demographic characteristics as covariates, and employment facility as random intercepts.

Data collection/extraction methods: We included work-environment predictors that appeared in all 4 years (11 in AES; 17 in MHPS).

Principal findings: In 2015-2018, 31.0%-38.0% of BHPs reported burnout in AES or MHPS. Work characteristics consistently associated with significantly lower burnout were included for AES: reasonable workload; having appropriate resources to perform a job well; supervisors address concerns; given an opportunity to improve skills. For MHPS, characteristics included: reasonable workload; work improves veterans' lives; mental health care provided is well-coordinated; and three reverse-coded items: staffing vacancies; daily work that clerical/support staff could complete; and collateral duties reduce availability for patient care. Facility-level staffing ratios and productivity did not significantly predict individual-level burnout. Workload represented the strongest predictor of burnout in both surveys.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated substantial, ongoing impacts that having appropriate resources including staff, workload, and supervisor support had on VHA BHP burnout. VHA may consider investing in approaches to mitigate the impact of BHP burnout on employees and their patients through providing staff supports, managing workload, and goal setting.

Keywords: burnout; mental health providers; supervisor support; workload.

References

REFERENCES

    1. National Center for Organization Development. What we know about burnout in VHA: quick facts. US Department of Veterans Affairs. 2017.
    1. Garcia HA, McGeary CA, Finley EP, Ketchum NS, McGeary DD, Peterson AL. Burnout among psychiatrists in the veterans health administration. Burn Res. 2015;2(4):108-114.
    1. VHA Office of Mental Health Operations. How does the facility's mental health staffing relate to other characteristics of the mental health treatment program? 2016.
    1. Paris M, Hoge MA. Burnout in the mental health workforce: a review. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010;37(4):519-528.
    1. Morse G, Salyers MP, Rollins AL, Monroe-DeVita M, Pfahler C. Burnout in mental health services: a review of the problem and its remediation. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2012;39(5):341-352.

LinkOut - more resources