Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion
| This is not the page to ask for help. | |
|
This page is for discussion of the Centralized discussion page itself, and its subpages. You may be looking for one of the following pages:
See also:
|
 Archives | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
UCoC discussion[edit]
@Xeno (WMF): any reason you think we need to link both a local and global discussion for the enforcement draft? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
- Barkeep49: Just the local link should be fine I think? I wanted to respect the original insertion, but do feel free to modify. The local page links to Meta already. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 01:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
- BillHPike: for what it’s worth I think the original link posted by Nosebagbear would be better; the enforcement draft guidelines are now outdated. New comments are invited at the talk page of the enforcement guidelines. Xeno (WMF) (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Xeno (WMF): Good point. I've changed the target back to m:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 00:20, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
RfC at Wikipedia:Notability (television) regarding guideline status[edit]
Hi, should the RfC at Wikipedia talk:Notability (television) § Request for comment to establish this notability guideline as an SNG be maybe added to the template? JBchrch talk 02:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia is drifting, no racing toward being an editorial websit[edit]
Tools that used to be regarded as aiding in neutrality are now weaponized for “righteous causes”. Merging content so that it can be deleted, building silos of opinion citations in opposition to other opinion citation silos, deletion wars, edit wars, talk wars are common, even on pages that seem relatively straight forward. Editor tribalism and politicking for votes is also probably common, but that’s harder to track, though I imagine combing through public user data would be enlightening.
I think the editors believe no one sees this activity, but it is more visible than ever. I don’t know what the solution is, but I’m debating ending my financial support for Wikipedia. 50.4.136.195 (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
Section for stuff on meta-wiki[edit]
We've been including a lot of discussions on Meta-wiki recently, which I think has been a great development. I'm wondering if it might be helpful to section the CENT template to distinguish discussions at meta-wiki and those locally. Even something as simple as a horizontal rule with local discussions above and meta discussions below. I think it would help draw more attention and lead to more meta discussions getting advertised. Thoughts? — Wug·a·po·des 04:24, 15 April 2022 (UTC)