Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Featured and good topics in Wikipedia

This star symbolizes the featured topic candidates on Wikipedia.
GA icon symbolizing Good topic candidates on Wikipedia.
A featured topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles).

A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic.

This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the featured and good topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic. If you would like to ask any questions about your topic and the featured/good topic process before submitting it, visit Wikipedia talk:Featured and good topic candidates.

Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Featured and good topic questions. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

The featured and good topics director, GamerPro64, or his delegates Aza24 and Bryan Rutherford, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived.

To contact the FTC director and delegates, please leave a message on the FTC talk page, or use the {{@FTC}} notification template elsewhere.

You may want to check previous archived nominations first:
Purge the cache to refresh this page

Featured content:

Good content:

Featured and good topic tools:

Nomination procedure[edit]

To create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button.

Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic. For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure.


Supporting and objecting[edit]

Please review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured and good topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

  • To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link).
  • If you approve of a nomination, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons. Supports that clearly evaluate the criteria will be weighted more than those that do not.
  • If you oppose a nomination, write '''Oppose''' or '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to fix the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored.
    • To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

For a topic to be promoted to featured or good topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate.

Featured topic nominations[edit]

Anne Hathaway[edit]

Anne Hathaway (born 1982) is an American actress. The recipient of multiple awards, she was one of the highest-paid actresses in the world in 2015, and her films have earned more than $6.8 billion worldwide. She made her breakthrough in the comedy The Princess Diaries (2001). After struggling to find success in family films, she transitioned to adult roles in the 2005 dramas Havoc and Brokeback Mountain, followed by the parts of an assistant to a fashion magazine editor in The Devil Wears Prada (2006) and a recovering alcoholic in Rachel Getting Married (2008). Hathaway then starred in the romantic films Bride Wars (2009), Valentine's Day (2010), and Love & Other Drugs (2010), and in the fantasy film Alice in Wonderland (2010). In 2012, she starred as Catwoman in The Dark Knight Rises and as Fantine in the musical drama Les Misérables, for which she won the Academy Award for Best Supporting Actress. She has since played a scientist in Interstellar (2014), the owner of an online fashion site in the comedy The Intern (2015), a haughty actress in the heist film Ocean's 8 (2018) and Rebekah Neumann in the miniseries WeCrashed (2022).

3 articles
Anne Hathaway
Anne Hathaway at MIFF (cropped).jpg
Performances
Awards and nominations
Contributor(s): FrB.TG

Three featured class articles to complete the trilogy of actress Anne Hathaway. My contributions are to the FA-class biography and the FL-class awards and nominations list. Her filmography was taken to FL by user Krish!. --FrB.TG (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: Seems to cover all the expected lists for an actor, linked by a navbox and everything. Great work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Comments refs 19, 35, 55, 190, 199, a citation of ref 205, refs 224 and 229 on the main article need to be removed or replaced per WP:RSP on International Business Times, HuffPost contributors, People's reliability for contentious claims, The Daily Beast, Forbes contributors, PR Newsire and The New York Post, while the same applies to refs 34, 73 and 91 since they fall under WP:SELFPUB. Also, refs 76 and 170 are missing publishers, ref 80 has MOS:QWQ issues and ref 169 includes MOS:CAPS violations. There are problems with formatting; Deadline Hollywood should be cited the same for all refs, not ever being listed as Deadline or using the publisher parameter, while you should always cite People not PEOPLE.com and only cite Variety for any of those refs. The Daily Beast also needs to be removed or replaced from the performances article, where the Deadline Hollywood problem is also prominent, alongside ref 53 having MOS:CAPS issues, refs 66, 67, 69 and 70, lack of consistency in citing The A.V. Club, YouTube not stylized correctly and ref 54 not having the citation filled in at all apart from the title. Finally, the awards and nominations article needs the replacement or removal of Asian News International per WP:RSP and MOS:CAPS issues fixed with refs 30, 39 and 59. These are a lot of issues but hopefully once they are resolved, this should make for a solid FT! --K. Peake 20:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All done, except for removing the People source, as it was an interview with her. Thank you. FrB.TG (talk) 22:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FrB.TG I have struck out of all of the issues, apart from ones that still stand. --K. Peake 06:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kyle Peake, sorry but what is missing or incorrect in the YouTube source? FrB.TG (talk) 07:49, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You should stylize as YouTube, not youtube. --K. Peake 09:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, my bad. It should be corrected now. Many thanks. FrB.TG (talk) 09:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your hard work on this, where the last issue has now been fixed! --K. Peake 10:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: Great work on these articles! --Pseud 14 (talk) 20:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good topic nominations[edit]

Hulk video games[edit]

The Hulk, a fictional character from the Marvel Comics universe, has appeared in several video games starting with the 1984 graphic adventure title Questprobe featuring The Hulk. He has appeared on home and handheld consoles in games developed by various companies, including Radical Entertainment and Edge of Reality. Apart from his standalone titles, which are often action-based beat 'em ups, the Hulk has appeared in other Marvel-based games within an ensemble cast, in which he may be accompanied by supporting characters such as Abomination and She-Hulk.

9 articles
Hulk video games
Hulk-logo.svg
Questprobe featuring The Hulk
The Incredible Hulk (1994)
The Incredible Hulk: The Pantheon Saga
Hulk
The Incredible Hulk (2003)
The Incredible Hulk: Ultimate Destruction
The Incredible Hulk (2008)
The Incredible Hulk (Nintendo DS)
Contributor(s): Cat's Tuxedo

All eight articles pertaining to the Hulk's standalone titles are GA, while the list detailing all of his video game appearances is FL. --Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 02:24, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: So, the scope is the Hulk-only standalone titles; I think that works. They're all joined by a navbox and category, although those also contain many other articles that don't fit this scope. I can support it! Good work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 13:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Good Job! Panini! 🥪 18:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the scope as defined works for me, all the necessary articles seem to be there. AryKun (talk) 07:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


MDNA[edit]

MDNA is the twelfth studio album by American singer Madonna, released on March 23, 2012, by Interscope Records. The album was conceived while the singer was busy throughout 2011 with filming her directorial venture, W.E.. It features guest features by female rappers M.I.A. and Nicki Minaj. A pop and EDM record, MDNA consists of upbeat songs which lyrically explore themes of partying, love for music, infatuation, as well as heartbreak, revenge and separation. The album's title is a triple entendre, and its allusion to MDMA drew negative reception from anti-drug groups.

It was Madonna's first release under the 360 deal she had signed with Live Nation in 2007 and the three-album deal with Interscope in 2012. The record received promotion from Madonna's performance at Super Bowl XLVI halftime show as well as the MDNA Tour, the latter becoming one of the highest-grossing tours of all time. Four singles were released—"Give Me All Your Luvin'", "Girl Gone Wild", "Masterpiece" and "Turn Up the Radio". Its first single reached number ten on the Billboard Hot 100 extending Madonna's then record as the artist with the most top-ten singles in that chart's history.

Music critics were ambivalent towards the album, which topped the record charts in most musical markets. Madonna set a new record for the most number-one albums by a solo artist in Australia and the United Kingdom. MDNA was the twelfth best-selling album of 2012 globally, and went on to sell two million copies.

11 articles
MDNA
Madonna à Nice 8.jpg
"Girl Gone Wild"
"Gang Bang"
"Turn Up the Radio"
"Give Me All Your Luvin'"
"Superstar"
"I Don't Give A"
"Masterpiece"
The MDNA Tour
MDNA World Tour
Super Bowl XLVI halftime show
Contributor(s): Christian, IndianBio, 11JORN

The article of Madonna's twelfth studio album, its singles/songs and promotional performances, all cover the criteria needed to be promoted to Featured/Good topic. --Christian (talk) 16:03, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: All the singles and notable tracks, the tour, the tour album, and the Super Bowl performance, all at GA. Looks comprehensive! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments: You need to make things more standard either "work and publisher" or only "work". Some articles have both, others don't have both. I would suggest removing the publisher when you have work already. Mainly on the articles of "I Don't Give A", "Masterpiece" and "Gang Bang". I already fixed it on "Superstar". On "Masterpiece", HuffPost contributors must be removed per WP:RSP, "Gang Bang" has the same problem on the external link, so any information related to it must either be removed or replaced. On "Girl Gone Wild" reference 23 has its publisher in all capital letters, reference 39 doesn't have an author or work/publisher, Pitchfork Media → Pitchfork (Website), reference 47 has no date, reference 78 is dead needs fixing, reference 92 has no work/publisher. Moreover, International Business Times and New York Post must be removed/replaced per WP:RSP.
  • Hi! could you please add all the comments so I can fix them all at once? Right now personal stuff takes up most of my time and I'm not as available here on wiki as other times. Thank you!! Christian (talk) 16:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I will do my best. MTV is always publisher. On "Turn Up the Radio"; Pitchfork Media → Pitchfork (Website), You have MTV News as both publisher and work, which one? Reference 50 you have both publisher and work, source 52 is work, a lot of publisher and work: reference 53-55, 57, 58, MuuMuse → wikilink, 67, 68, 70, 73 and 75. I might have missed some stuff. On "Give Me All Your Luvin", source 13-16 (publisher or work?), Medium is an unreliable source, source 40, 52, 53, 56, on 58 where is the staff/authors? Again 93, 94, 118-120, not sure if Fashionista is a reliable source, but I will take it. Souce 139 and 143 are dead. Basically, the biggest issues are MTV and MTV News. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:43, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure why the Super Bowl XLVI halftime show article was included here. She performed one song from this album during it. Can you explain it to me? MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 18:38, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    On the The MDNA Tour, there are two PopCrush sources, as well as a HuffPost contributor, and New York Post which are considered unreliable ad must be removed and their info either removed or replaced by reliable ones. Some sources have been questioned but no consensus has been reached or they are walking on thin ice, so I won't address those. Every article has "madonna.com" → Official Madonna website. On the MDNA World Tour, wikilink first instance of The New York Times and unlink the second, Madonna.com → Official Madonna website (19, 23, 28, 29 and 118), remove the location of the Daily Telegraph, reference 25 and 26 missing author, Digital Spy is both as work and publisher.
    MDNA album New York Post and PR Newswire must be removed/replaced per WP:RSP. Madonna.com → Official Madonna website, Pitchfork Media → Pitchfork

Chrishm21 I have pointed out every issue that needs to be fixed. Let me know once you are done. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Topic removal candidates[edit]

Group 4 elements[edit]

5 articles
Group 4 elements
Titan-crystal bar.JPG
Titanium
Zirconium
Hafnium
Rutherfordium

Titanium is no longer at FA, so the topic is ineligible for GT status. AryKun (talk) 07:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]