Page semi-protected

Wikipedia:Requested moves

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:RM)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Closing instructions

For the current list of potentially controversial requested moves, see § Current discussions.
"Wikipedia:RM" and "Wikipedia:RFPM" redirect here. For requested mergers, see Wikipedia:Proposed article mergers. For removals, see Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. For page history mergers, see Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. For requesting the page mover user right, see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Page mover.
Note: For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.
For detailed guidance on how and when to move a page, see Wikipedia:Moving a page.
Click here to purge this page
Shortcuts

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. (For retitling files, categories and other items, see When not to use this page.)

Please read the article titling policy and the guideline regarding primary topics before moving a page or requesting a page move.

Any autoconfirmed user can use the Move function to perform most moves (see Help:How to move a page). If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page. However, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

  • Technical reasons may prevent a move: a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. See: § Requesting technical moves.
  • Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
  • A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
  • Unregistered users and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are generally processed after seven days. If consensus is reached at or after this time, a reviewer will enact the request. If not, the request may be re-listed to allow more time for consensus to develop, or the discussion closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

When not to use this page

Shortcuts

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

Undiscussed moves

Shortcut

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

  • No article exists at the new target title;
  • There has been no discussion (especially no recent discussion) about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
  • It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with such a move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

Requesting technical moves

Shortcut

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct page if you tried to move a page, and you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:".

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the top of the list, filling in pages and reason: 
    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new page title|reason=reason for move}}
    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

  • Woodworking joints → Joinery (move · discuss) – The subject of the page is joinery, currently a disambiguation page of only two entries, this page and Joiner. There is no reason to misname this page the bulky "Woodworking joints" to disambiguate the two. Wikiuser100 (talk) 12:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed

Contested technical requests

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves

Shortcut

The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. A move is potentially controversial if either of the following applies:

  • there has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
  • someone could reasonably disagree with the move.

Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested. For technical move requests, such as to correct obvious typographical errors, see Requesting technical moves. The technical moves procedure can also be used for uncontroversial moves when the requested title is occupied by an existing article.

Do not create a new move request when one is already open on the same talk page. Instead, consider contributing to the open discussion if you would like to propose another alternative. Multiple closed move requests may be on the same page, but each should have a unique section heading.

Do not create a move request to rename one or more redirects. Redirects cannot be used as current titles in requested moves.

Requesting a single page move

Shortcut

To request a single page move, click on the "New section" tab of the talk page of the article you want moved, without adding a new subject/header, inserting this code: 

{{subst:requested move|NewName|reason=Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.}}

Replace NewName with the requested new name of the page (or with a simple question mark, if you want more than one possible new name to be considered). The template will automatically create the heading "Requested move 19 March 2022" and sign the post for you.

There is no need to edit the article in question. Once the above code is added to the Talk page, a bot will automatically add the following notification at the top of the affected page:

Note: Unlike other request processes on Wikipedia, such as Requests for comment, nominations need not be neutral. Make your point as best you can; use evidence (such as Google Ngrams and pageview statistics) and refer to applicable policies and guidelines, especially our article titling policy and the guideline on disambiguation and primary topics.

WikiProjects may subscribe to Article alerts to receive RM notifications. For example, Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Article alerts/Requested moves is transcluded to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. RMCD bot notifies many of the other Wikiprojects listed on the talk page of the article to be moved to invite project members to participate in the RM discussion. Requesters should feel free to notify any other Wikiproject or noticeboard that might be interested in the move request, as long as this notification is neutral.

Single page move on a different talk page

Occasionally, a move request must be made on a talk page other than the talk page of the page to be moved. For example, a request to rename Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Resources to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing and templates would need to take place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation because the talk page of the project page to be moved, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Resources, is a redirect to that centralized discussion page. In this type of case, the requested move should be made using the following code: 

{{subst:requested move|reason=(the reason for the page move goes here).|current1=(present title of page to be renamed)|new1=(proposed title of page)}}

Note that the |1= unnamed parameter is not used, and that the |current1= and |new1= parameters are used similar to multiple page moves described below.

Requesting multiple page moves

Shortcut

A single template may be used to request multiple related moves. On one of the talk pages of the affected pages, create a request and format it as below. A sample request for three page moves is shown here (for two page moves, omit the lines for current3 and new3). For four page moves, add lines for current4 and new4, and so on. There is no technical limit on the number of multiple move requests, but before requesting very large multi-moves, consider whether a naming convention should be changed first. Discuss that change on the talk page for the naming convention, e.g., Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (sportspeople).

To request a multiple page move, edit at the bottom of the talk page of the article you chose for your request, without adding a new header, inserting this code: 

{{subst:requested move
| current1 = Current title of page 1
| new1 = New title for page 1 with the talk page hosting this discussion
| current2 = Current title of page 2
| new2 = New title for page 2
| current3 = Current title of page 3
| new3 = New title for page 3
| reason = Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, ideally referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support where appropriate. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.
}}
See also: Template:Requested move/extended blank

For example, to propose moving the articles Wikipedia and Wiki, put this template on Talk:Wikipedia, and replace current2 with Wiki. The discussion for all affected articles is held on the talk page of the article at page 1 (Talk:Wikipedia). Do not sign a request with ~~~~ as the template does this automatically. Do not skip pairs of numbers.

RMCD bot automatically places a notice section on the talk page of the additional pages that are included in your request, advising that the move discussion is in progress, where it is, and that all discussion for all pages included in the request should take place at that one location.

Occasionally the discussions for significant multi-move requests may be hosted on WikiProject talk pages or other pages in Project namespace. For multi-move discussions hosted on a page which is not itself proposed to be moved, specify |current1=Current title of page 1 for the first page to move.

Request all associated moves explicitly

Please list every move that you wish to have made in your request. For example, if you wish to move Cricket (disambiguation) to Cricket because you do not believe the sport is the primary topic for the search term "Cricket", then you actually want to move two pages, both Cricket (disambiguation) and Cricket. Thus you must list proposed titles for each page affected by your request. For example, you might propose:

If a new title is not proposed for the sport, it is more difficult to achieve consensus for a new title for that article. A move request that does not show what to do with the material at its proposed target, such as:

is incomplete. Such requests may be completed as a request to decide the best new title by discussion.

Template usage examples and notes
Talk page tag Text that will be shown (and usage notes)
{{subst:Requested move|new|reason=why}}
links talk edit
Requested move 19 March 2022

Wikipedia:Requested moves → New – why Example (talk) 13:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Use when the proposed new title is given.
Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:.
This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.[reply]

{{subst:Requested move|?|reason=why}}
Requested move 19 March 2022

Wikipedia:Requested moves → ? – why Example (talk) 13:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Use when the proposed new title is not known.
Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:.
This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.[reply]

{{subst:Requested move|new|reason=why|talk=yes}}
Requested move 19 March 2022

Wikipedia:Requested moves → New – why Example (talk) 13:37, 19 March 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]

Survey
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Discussion
Any additional comments:



This template adds subsections for survey and discussion.
Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:
Click the "New Section" tab on the talk page and leave the Subject/headline blank, as the template by default automatically creates the heading.

{{subst:Requested move|new1=x|current2=y|new2=z|reason=why}}
Requested move 19 March 2022

– why Example (talk) 13:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted.
Be sure to use the subst: and place this tag at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.
Add additional related move requests in pairs (|current3= and |new3=, |current4= and |new4=, etc.).[reply]

{{subst:Requested move|new1=?|current2=y|new2=?|reason=why}}
Requested move 19 March 2022

– why Example (talk) 13:37, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commenting on a requested move

Shortcut

All editors are welcome to contribute to the discussion regarding a requested page move. There are a number of standards that Wikipedians should practice in such discussions:

  • When editors recommend a course of action, they write Support or Oppose in bold text, which is done by surrounding the word with three single quotes on each side, e.g. '''Support'''.
  • Comments or recommendations are added on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with *) and signed by adding ~~~~ to the end. Responses to another editor are threaded and indented using multiple bullets.
  • The article itself should be reviewed before any recommendation is made; do not base recommendations solely on the information supplied by other editors. It may also help to look at the article's edit history. However, please read the earlier comments and recommendations, as well as prior move requests. They may contain relevant arguments and useful information.
  • Vested interests in the article should be disclosed per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI.

When participating, please consider the following:

  • Editors should make themselves familiar with the article titling policy at Wikipedia:Article titles.
  • Other important guidelines that set forth community norms for article titles include Wikipedia:Disambiguation, specific naming conventions, and the manual of style.
  • The debate is not a vote; please do not make recommendations that are not sustained by arguments.
  • Explain how the proposed article title meets or contravenes policy and guidelines rather than merely stating that it does so.
  • Nomination already implies that the nominator supports the name change, and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line.[a]
  • Do not make conflicting recommendations. If you change your mind, use strike-through to retract your previous statement by enclosing it between <s> and </s> after the bullets, and de-bold the struck words, as in "• Support Oppose".

Please remember that reasonable editors will sometimes disagree, but that arguments based in policy, guidelines, and evidence have more weight than unsupported statements. When an editor offers an argument that does not explain how the move request is consistent with policies and guidelines, a reminder to engage in constructive, on-topic discussion may be useful. On the other hand, a pattern of responding to requests with groundless opinion, proof by assertion, and ignoring content guidelines may become disruptive. If a pattern of disruptive behavior persists after efforts are made to correct the situation through dialogue, please consider using a dispute resolution process.

Closing a requested move

Any uninvolved editor in good standing may close a move request. Please read the closing instructions for information on how to close a move request. The Simple guide to closing RM discussions details how to actually close a requested move discussion.

Relisting a requested move

Shortcut

Relisting a discussion moves the request out of the backlog up to the current day in order to encourage further input. The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion. In general, discussions should not be relisted more than once before properly closing.[b] Users relisting a debate which has already been relisted, or relisting a debate with a substantial discussion, should write a short explanation on why they did not consider the debate sufficient to close. While there is no consensus forbidding participation in a requested move discussion after relisting it, many editors consider it an inadvisable form of supervote. If you want to relist a discussion and then participate in it, be prepared to explain why you think it was appropriate.

Relisting should be done using {{subst:relisting}}, which automatically includes the relister's signature, and which must be placed at the very end of the initial request after the move requester's signature (and subsequent relisters' signatures).

When a relisted discussion reaches a resolution, it may be closed at any time according to the closing instructions; there is no required length of time to wait before closing a relisted discussion.

If discussion has become stale, or it seems that discussion would benefit from more input of editors versed in the subject area, consider more widely publicizing the discussion, such as by notifying WikiProjects of the discussion using the template {{RM notification}}. Banners placed at the top of the talk page hosting the move request can often be used to identify WikiProjects suitable for notification.

Notes

  1. ^ A nominator making a procedural nomination with which they may not agree is free to add a bulleted line explaining their actual position. Additional detail, such as sources, may also be provided in an additional bullet point if its inclusion in the nomination statement would make the statement unwieldy. Please remember that the entire nomination statement is transcluded into the list on this page.
  2. ^ Despite this, discussions are occasionally relisted more than once.

Current discussions

Shortcut
This section lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 79 discussions have been relisted.

March 19, 2022

March 18, 2022

  • (Discuss) – Pseudomonadota → Proteobacteria – Proteobacteria was renamed Pseudomonadota by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes only in October 2021. Whilst ICSP is the relevant authority, the standard naming convention for articles about organisms in Wikipedia uses the common name. A Google Scholar search for Pseudomonadota returns, at the time I write this comment, only 12 results, one of which is the article publishing the new name and one of which is a comment criticising the decision. By contrast, a search for Proteobacteria returns 4,630 results published in 2022. Regardless of the official name for the clade, Preoteobacteria clearly remains the most commonly used name by an enormous margin, and should remain the primary name for the Wikipedia article until that changes (as it seems to on every other language Wikipedia. Kaficek (talk) 21:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Independent legal reasoning in Islamic law → Ijtihad – Ijtihad absolutely dwarves the use of the convoluted term "Independent legal reasoning" in English-language scholarly literature about the subject. "Indendent legal reasoning" + "Islam" gets about 700 Google Scholar hits; ijtihad gets 41,000. Almost all the terms in Islam on the periphery of ijtihad are already named in naturalised phonetic English, such as taqlid, jihad, etc. Ijtihad is a big enough concept in Islam to be treated in the same manner, just as it is in scholarly sources. Even independent of this, there would be a case for the change based on pure consistency, as ijitihad also blows away terms like taqlid in terms of usage. See taqlid on Google Scholar (just over a third the ijtihad tally) and Ngram. Iskandar323 (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Guanyu Zhou → Zhou Guanyu – It is of my reasoning that 'enough' media is now using this format to refer to them. [1] [2] [3] [4] In addition, official documents and the driver's own social medias also use this format. [5] [6] Certain commentators have also begun referring to the driver using this name format during broadcasts. I personally feel the article is fine to be moved, as it seems highly likely sources going forward will be using this format. Further discussion can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Formula One#Guanyu Zhou Lucifer's Scribe (talk) 16:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Miguel Baeza (fighter) → Miguel Baeza – He's the primary topic with almost 100 daily views compared to the only other person who has the same name - Miguel Baeza (footballer) - who doesn't have much written for his article and gets 0-1 views a day. With only two articles, the name should default to the fighter with a hatnote linking to the footballer. This request was made seven months ago, but since then, it is more clear and apparent that the fighter is the primary topic. Marty2Hotty (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Eastern Ukraine offensive → Southeastern Ukraine offensive – While this article covers only the military operations in the Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts in southeastern Ukraine, this article is titled "Eastern Ukraine offensive." This can confuse our readers into thinking that the article covers offensive operations in both the northeastern and southeastern Ukraine regions, when this is clearly not the case. This article used to cover military operations in both northeastern and southeastern Ukraine. However, ever since content in this article pertaining to northeastern Ukraine was split off into Northeastern Ukraine offensive, the title for this article has not been updated accordingly to reflect the changes. Since we already have an article titled Northeastern Ukraine offensive, I propose moving this article to Southeastern Ukraine offensive, per WP:PRECISE. LightandDark2000 🌀 (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Marina Rodriguez (fighter) → Marina Rodriguez – The fighter has 1500 daily views. The weightlifter has one written line in her article and gets 15 views a day. I believe readers are looking for the fighter when they land on her article anyway. A hatnote on the fighter's article leading to the only other Marina Rodriguez, the weightlifter, is sufficient. This is a no-brainer. Note: Currently, "Marina Rodriguez" redirects to the weightlifter's article "Marina Rodríguez", which has an accent on the "i".Marty2Hotty (talk) 00:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 17, 2022

  • (Discuss) – Black and Tan → Black and tan – "Black and tan" is not a proper noun in this context and does not need capitals. I'm assuming they're there because of the false belief that the drink's name derives from the Black and Tans; in actual fact, it predates the formation of the RIC Reserves by at least forty years, and simply refers to the contrasting colours of stout and ale. Zacwill (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Air pollution sensor → Air pollution measurement – I'm thinking this should be a much broader article that summarizes/compares all forms of air pollution measurement, including air pollution sensors (typically the modern electronic kind is what most general readers will think of, but there are also various older technologies), passive monitors (things like diffusion tubes will be familiar to many readers but have no obvious place in this article since they are "passive"), and older technologies (deposit gauges, Ringelmann charts etc). It should give a complete overview of all the ways we measure and monitor pollution gases and particulates - and "air pollution sensors" are only one such. 45154james (talk) 17:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Seo Ji-hun (gamer) → XellOs – Per WP:COMMONNAME. He is not "known by his real name now", and "real name" is not a reason to override COMMONNAME. Esports players are known by their handles, not their real name, and anyone looking for this person would certainly search XellOs, and not Seo Ji-hun. – Pbrks (t • c) 17:18, 28 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 16:11, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Asset Disposal and Information Security Alliance → ADISA Certification – I work for this company, we have made the ADISA logo is registered trademark which is how people will recognise the brand, the logo is associated with ADISA Certification Ltd, hence why it will be appropriate to avoid confusion to change the name to suit. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically. 2A00:23A8:4CC9:3D01:CD50:148E:8D39:3F30 (talk) 15:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. NW1223 <Howl at me•My hunts> 15:59, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Bollywood → Hindi cinema – Already started on WT:ICTF#Bollywood vs Hindi cinema to make sure there's agreement in the first place before a name change is proposed with support. Hindi cinema is the formal name of the film industry based in Mumbai. Bollywood is a journalistic term and definitely not encyclopedic (interestingly, even Hollywood is not given an article of its own). For reference, the most important book on the film industry, by no less than Encyclopedia Britannica, is called just that: Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema. Generally speaking, the informal term of Bollywood refers to a sort of style which covers only a portion of popular Hindi cinema (see this book by Tejaswini Ganti or Govind Nihalani's article on the use of the term). As many viewers know, the Hindi film industry comprises much more than just the popular movie format. Moreover, Indian cinema has changed so drastically over the last couple of years where many of the ingredients which are associated with what is commonly known as Bollywood (a term which came up in the 1980s) have now disappeared. Over the years, and off late in particular, there have been film-industry professionals expressing dissatisfaction with the use of this term, which they find demeaning (Sources: Hindustan Times). That being the case, it is only logical to give Hindi cinema its formal name on Wikipedia. Shahid • Talk2me 11:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 15:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – 2022 Chernihiv bombing → 2022 Chernihiv bombing on civilians – I think this article needs a new title. There is a whole battle going on in Chernihiv. It's clear that the city has been bombed a lot. But this article seems to exclusively refer to the 3 March bombing that killed 47 people. However, the title does not exactly reflect that. It is titled as if it covered every single bombing that happened on the city in 2022, when such is not the case. We can take example of other articles with unorthodox titles such as NATO bombing of Albanian refugees near Gjakova and propose a new one. "2022 Chernihiv bombing on civilians" is not perfect as probably more civilians have died in the city as a result of bombings but I think it'd get us closer to a satisfactory option. Adding "3 March" into the title is probably not preferred so other options could be "2022 Chernihiv residential area bombing" or "2022 bombing of a residential area in Chernihiv", and "2022 Vacheslava Chornovola and Kruhova streets bombing" (probably a bad option). We could also follow French Wikipedia's steps and title it as a massacre. Although there was another murder of civilians in Chernihiv yesterday so maybe we shouldn't chose this option. Super Ψ Dro 14:53, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Julian (emperor) → Julian – The emperor Julian is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the term 'Julian'. In the last 90 days, his page had 69 thousand views, while the next 10 articles titled 'Julian' had 25 thousand combined views, so people searching for 'Julian' are probably looking for the emperor. As a Roman emperor, he also has more long-term significance than any of the other Julian articles. We can add a hatnote linking to the Julian calendar, which is more significant than the emperor but not known by the single term 'Julian'. Galagora (talk) 14:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Fano (nationalist movement) → Fano (militia) – A blocked sock moved this article from Fano (militia) to Fano (nationalist movement) [[7]] the reasoning given in the edit summary:●its characterization as a militia is highly disputed also doesn't hold up most sources refer Fano as a militia. The sources in this article (as far i read) doesn't say nationalist movement. WP:COMMONNAME applies here, unless others can substiante the current name over militia. Dawit S Gondaria (talk) 06:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. ---CX Zoom(he/him) (let's talk|contribs) 06:05, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 16, 2022

  • (Discuss) – Jay (disambiguation) → Jay – No clear primary topic, the bird has 5,872 views but the given name has 1,668, the South Korean singer has 1,389, the place in Florida has 583, the album has 520, the place in Oklahoma has 400, the place in Vermont has 309, the place in New York has 254, the place in Maine has 211, the place in Herefordshire has 23, the locomotive has 4, the South African singer has 3, the French singer has 2, the The Dumping Ground character has 1 and the View Askewniverse character has 1. J, the letter has 22,526, Joint (cannabis) has 8,953, Jay-Z has 225,237, Toronto Blue Jays has 18,332 and Jays Foods has 1,520.[[8]]. Google and Images mainly returns the bird but Books doesn't. In terms of usage the views don't indicate a clear primary topic even if those in the 2nd list were only occasionally "Jay" and some of the other uses like the given name, the letter etc also have long-term significance, possibly more. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Chernobyl → Chornobyl – The city is commonly known as Chernobyl in English, yet this name is derived from the Russian-language name Чернобыль. According to article 3.1 of the Ukrainian Toponimic Guidelines approved by the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names, "Geographical names of the Ukrainian territory are formed and represented in writing according to the Ukrainian Spelling Rules in all spheres of their official use" (you can find the guidelines here https://unstats.un.org/unsd/ungegn/nna/toponymic/). According to the UN-approved rules of Ukrainian to English transliteration, Ukrainian name Чорнобиль is transliterated as Chornobyl (see the rules here https://unstats.un.org/unsd/geoinfo/ungegn/docs/26th-gegn-docs/WP/WP21_Roma_system_Ukraine%20_engl._.pdf). Besides, using transliterations of Ukrainian geographical names from Russian instead of Ukrainian is a relic of colonial past, not unlike using the name Bombay for the city of Mumbai in India. The usage of such names is especially offensive considering the ongoing fight for independence of Ukraine against Russia, the former colonizer, which wages the war trying to wipe the Ukrainian nation from the face of the Earth in the most brutal way. Leonidslupsky (talk) 11:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – List of motorways in the United Kingdom → Motorways in the United Kingdom – This current article is the only real article on motorways in the United Kingdom yet it is officially classed as a list. I believe the title should be changed to bring it into line with Irelands article and the article be reformed to include other aspects of British motorways which do not currently feature in this article (ie info about the history of British motorways as well as info about the signs ect). MOTORAL1987 (talk) 07:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – The Proms → BBC Proms – We almost universally and officially called the summer classical music concert as "BBC Proms" rather than "Proms" or "The Proms" as two latter are most likely refer to any music or dance gathering parties, such as school prom, dance prom, etc. I have an evidence about it such as their social media account, I Newspaper, Classical Music, and many more, and also evident by its current logo (which will most likely change in 2022 due to BBC Reith rebrand). 125.167.56.250 (talk) 05:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Stephen Hahn (oncologist) → Stephen Hahn – He didn't make it to March, but that's because he made it to the end of Trump's term and Joe Biden became president on January 20, 2021. Even after leaving office, the physician has had more pageviews each day than the dab page and the art dealer combined. Even when you include the pageviews of the seven FDA comissioners before Hahn, the other Stephen Hahns are at the bottom of the list. Considering that Hahn was the Commissioner of the FDA during the early parts of the pandemic and was involved in the authorization of the Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J vaccines in the United States, I feel like he is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, despite others thinking that this is just an example of WP:RECENTISM. I'm pretty sure the guy whose decisions affected the lives of the millions of people living in the United States of America is going to have more long term significance than a guy who owned art and opened a small gallery.  Bait30  Talk 2 me pls? 03:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Levi Wallace (American football) → Levi Wallace – Primary topic. The other Levi Wallace is a 19th century state politician, who originally had the base name. I moved the politician out of the base name and created a dab page, but on 2nd thought, this football player should occupy the base name. I am not even sure if the politician is notable, or if it should be deleted. Natg 19 (talk) 00:16, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 15, 2022

  • (Discuss) – Paramount Global Content Licensing → Paramount Global Distribution Group – There's no dispute that the parent company changed its name to Paramount Global, but what is this sub-company called. The sub-company's website says it is Paramount Global Distribution Group, and the article was moved accordingly. However, on February 19th, the article was moved again to Paramount Global Content Licensing and an unsourced sentence was added to the article claiming that this was a second rebranding by the parent company. I cannot find any secondary sources confirming that. The only source I can find is the primary source - the sub-company's website - and while the website title as the Content Licensing name, the website itself still says it is the Distribution Group name. Therefore, unless there are other, contrary, more reliable sources, the article should be moved back over redirect. Singularity42 (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Alternativa (political party) → Alternative (Italy) – The page was previously moved to the italian name of the party ("L'Alternativa c'è") because the translation was controversial, but the translation of the current name is uncontroversial ("Alternative"), therefore I think that an English title is preferable for this page, also like for Alternativa (North Macedonia). Furthermore, the disambiguation "political party" is wrong because there is another party with this name. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – 7th Hussars (disambiguation) → 7th Hussars – No primary target. 7th Hussars (currently at the base name) is not an article, but a redirect to 7th Queen's Own Hussars. The dab page has no exact match to 7th Hussars; all entries are plausible targets of someone searching for 7th Hussars. [pageviews] shows Queen's does get the most views, but not enough to be PT, and many of those are probably not through the redirect.
    Note that the dab was the PT for a short time before being reverted because "there were 50 incoming links". That is not a valid reason to declare a PT, those can be fixed easily. MB 20:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Favonian (talk) 12:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Royal Farms Arena → Baltimore Arena – Social media for the arena yesterday scrubbed the name of the "Chicken Box" from PFPs, header images etc. It is reasonable to conclude the naming rights deal has ended with the arena's closure for renovation. However, I'm not aware of a local news article to that effect. Aresef (talk) 04:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 10:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Wahhabism → Muwahhidun (Wahhabi) – using the exonym "Wahhabism" alone is quite misleading in this article since the term may mislead many people in conflating the movement with a wide swathe of religious groups of seperate origins that shares common doctrines. Sometimes, conservative movements with opposing doctrines are also used to denote "Wahhabism". Hence I suggest that this article title should be more precise to denote the Arabian regional movement descended from Ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab and his students. And this is why I suggested the title Muwahhidun (Wahhabi), since: * There are multiple Muwahhidun movements historically * There are multiple movements getting referred to as "Wahhabi" * A seperate article is needed to for the term Wahhabi, which is different from the movement of Muwahhdin-Wahhabi Hence the title Muwahhidin(Wahhabi) shall be more precise, accurate and less confusing. Moroever, the existing links of "Wahhabism" shall always lead to here; since it automatically redirects here. Meanwhile "Wahhabi" when used as a pejoritave epithet or to denote other movements not descended from Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, someone needs to create a seperate article for the label and its etymology. Shadowwarrior8 (talk) 08:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Darth Maul → Maul (Star Wars) – Primary sources such as Clone Wars and Rebels have primarily called him just Maul since 2012, but a lot of secondary sources have stuck with the old name since he had a 15 year absence from the series and was known as Darth Maul before and during that absence, and maybe because the new name is barely different from the old one. I'd argue that Darth Maul is no longer his WP:COMMONNAME anymore due to primary sources just using Maul, and to whoever wishes to say that Darth Maul is still his COMMONNAME, I'd like to hear why instead of just giving the policy as a reason when currently primary sources have changed the COMMONNAME. Should COMMONNAME be given more weight on the primary sources that give the material existence or the secondary sources that give it notability? Unnamed anon (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Challenger di Roseto degli Abruzzi → Internazionali di Tennis - Regione Abruzzo – Even if i am not entirely sure of this title change i don't feel comfortable with the actual one, using the preposition "di". Usually these types of titles don't match the official titles, and are shortchanges for longer titles. My rationale for the change of title is that the regional Tennis Federation, and in this article, this one, and this too, is used the proposed title. We already have a tradition of "Internazionali di tennis - Città di XXXXX" with the name of the italian city (Todi, Perugia, Forlì, etc..) where the ATP Challenger is played, and we have a prominent precedent for the title abovementioned in Internazionali di Tennis del Friuli Venezia Giulia with the name of the region instead of that of the city (Cordenons). I am aware the name on the official draw pdf is "Regione Abruzzo Aterno Gas & Power Cup" which is composed of the region name plus the sponsor name, but i recall there is already consensus on not using sponsor names on the main page of tournaments. Still I am not, i repeat, entirely sure we should make this move. I am ok with changing the title into "Roseto degli Abruzzi Challenger" or "Challenger Roseto degli Abruzzi" if you don't agree on the proposed one. 87.20.107.44 (talk) 12:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 14, 2022

  • (Discuss) – Exeter–Andover rivalry → Andover–Exeter Rivalry – Wikipedia naming convention 1: "Use commonly recognizable names." This is most commonly referred to Andover–Exeter, not Exeter–Andover. Also, this aligns with the score order list in the article (Andover score, then Exeter score). Also fixes capitalization. Dynosol (talk) 19:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Encounter (Canadian TV series) → General Motors Theatre – The show ran under various titles through its history, but the one it ran under longest and was probably best known for in its native Canada was General Motors Theatre. It seems a bit silly therefore to have it listed here under an alternative title it only ran under briefly when exported to the USA. Angmering (talk) 14:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 19:23, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Vijayalakshmi (Kannada actress) → Vijayalakshmi (actress) – No other actress with just the name Vijayalakshmi. Also, she acts in other languages as well (such as Tamil films). She has more page views than Vijayalakshmi Feroz, so this can be considered a primary topic. Current title "Kannada" is confusing as she has stopped acting predominately in Kannada for a while. DareshMohan (talk) 07:23, 1 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Colin M (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Colonestarrice (talk) 18:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Darkstalkers 3 → Vampire Savior – Vampire Savior is the name of the original arcade release worldwide (yes, including Western countries). Darkstalkers 3 is the name for the PlayStation port in Western countries, which came a year later, and features different characters. The main topic of this page is the original arcade game, with its derivatives (Vampire Hunter 2, Vampire Savior 2, and Darkstalkers 3) discussed in the Release section. TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 13, 2022

  • (Discuss) – Saint Peter's Peacocks and Peahens → Saint Peter's Peacocks – The women's athletic teams at Saint Peter's University have used the Peacocks moniker as well since 2013. That August, a move was made by The Ink Daddy! but was reverted four months later by Jrcla2. It is standard for these article titles to be updated in this instance. A perusal of the SPU athletics website shows no mention of Peahens in any recent year; indeed, the women's basketball players wear "Peacocks" jerseys. The name is not mentioned in the athletics style guide which was revised after a major rebrand effort in 2020 ([15]). I believe this undiscussed reversion from years ago is actually causing reliable sources to print Peahens as a name years after its discontinuation by the university. A March 4, 2022, Times Herald-Record article used the name Peahens (republished by Yahoo at [16]), and I see a few other scattered stories that are using this name incorrectly in recent years. In 2014, The Statesman, the student newspaper at SUNY Stony Brook, had to print a correction about the name: A previous version referred to the Saint Peter’s women’s basketball team as the “Saint Peter’s Peahens.” The team is known as the “Saint Peter’s Peacocks.” The university's athletics style guide does not even mention the name, and publications from their own sports information department do not use it ([17]). We need to do likewise. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:42, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Suprangular → Surangular – Surangular is overwhelmingly more commonly used than "suprangular", as evidenced by Google Ngrams and hits on Google and Google Scholar. For instance, Google Scholar finds only 145 results for "suprangular" and 5,590 for "surangular", and the Google Ngrams graph shows use of "suprangular" to be essentially negligible. Suprangular isn't even the second-most common spelling. It's fourth, behind "supra-angular" and "supraangular". I don't know if I've ever seen the spelling "suprangular" used before today, and I consider myself reasonably well-read on the subject of vertebrate osteology. Ornithopsis (talk) 21:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 12, 2022

  • (Discuss) – Gex (series) → Gex – Seems the game series is the clear primary topic by pageviews. While Duchy of Savoy also gets high views, that refers to "Pays de Gex", a region in the duchy that is already only a partial title match. Similarly "Colomby de Gex" refers to a peak of the Jura mountains, and that is also naturally disambiguated. There is nothing that is a direct match for "Gex" that could also be seen as primary. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – TJ Eyoma → T. J. Eyoma – Acronym should be spaced (but the spaced acronym is a redirect page to the main page) and his official name is "Timothy John" so "TJ" is an abbreviation. Debartolo2917 (talk) 19:50, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Vikings (2013 TV series) → Vikings (TV series) – WP:INCDAB states that In individual cases consensus may determine that a parenthetically disambiguated title that is still ambiguous has a primary topic, but the threshold for identifying a primary topic for such titles is higher than for a title without parenthetical disambiguation. I believe that this threshold is in this case easily met. The 2013 series is a critically acclaimed hit series and franchise (with Vikings: Valhalla), whereas Vikings (2012 TV series) is an obscure BBC documentary that aired 3 episodes over 14 days and had no lasting cultural impact; the pageviews also show that even at its lowest offseason pageviews dip it dominates with roughly a 100,000:1 ratio (and I am willing to bet that most of those page views are from people at Vikings (2013 TV series) seeing the "not to be confused" with Vikings (2012 TV series) at the top and clicking to see what it is). There is no chance that the 2012 series could ever come close to the 2013 series' popularity or significance, even long after it has ended, and after its spin-off will eventually end. Poindextero (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elapsed listings

Shortcut
The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.
  • (Discuss) – Christmas jumper → Ugly Christmas sweater – I think this is the more common title. Additionally, Per MOS:COMMONALITY, we should use universally accepted terms rather than those less widely distributed, especially in titles. As "sweater" is used in both British and American English, while "jumper" is only used in British English, the title that is just as easily recognized across both major varieties of English is superior to the title easily recognized in only one of the two major varieties. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Backlog

Shortcut
Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.
  • (Discuss) – Youth League (Italy) → Lega Giovani – There is no need to translate the name to English, also given that there is no common usage of the term "Youth League" in English sources. Furthermore, "Youth League (Italy)" also sounds like a sports youth league, in English. Yakme (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Chokha → Cherkeska – i tried changing it but it says the page title "cherkeska" already exists and it redircts to the same page title "chokha'. the word chokha is used only among one ethnic group and the clothing is mostly known as the "cherkeska" and its not appropriate to call a clothing that more than one ethnic group wears by a word that only one ethnic group uses Cherkezy (talk) 09:40, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Shaker (disambiguation) → Shaker – No primary topic for the singular[[21]][[22]]. While views show that for titles at "Shaker (foo)" Shakers gets 15,994 views compared with only 2,869 for everything at "Shaker (foo)"[[23]]. Bury F.C. gets more (18,188) and some of the uses like Salt and pepper shakers may have more long-term significance than the religious group for the singular especially since the group currently only has a population of 2, though it is a level 5 vital article. In the 2019 RM I proposed having no primary topic for both singular and plural but there was clearly consensus against the plural however there was some support for the singular and one of the participants suggested starting a new RM for just that in a few months but its now been nearly 2 and a half years. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Use of force by states → Aggression in international law – The current title is really misleading. Yes, the UN charter refers to the use of force, but "use of force by states" could also refer to many domestic state actions, such as for example arrests, deportation, police brutality, etc. A synonym for use of force in international law is act of aggression or armed attack (see Sayapin, Sergey (2014). "Elements of an Act of Aggression: An Overview of Modern International Law and Practice". The Crime of Aggression in International Criminal Law: Historical Development, Comparative Analysis and Present State. T.M.C. Asser Press. ISBN 978-90-6704-927-6.), either of which would make it clearer what the article is about. (t · c) buidhe 17:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Glory to Ukraine → Slava Ukraini! – As a result of the invasion, the salute has, naturally, seen a vast uptick of use from non-Ukrainians wishing to express solidarity, to such a point where nearly all non-Ukrainian use dates from the past few weeks. In particular, even amongst English speakers, the Ukrainian form seems to be much more used than the translated form, indicating that — for the purposes of WP:UE — this is the common name for the salute. (Google News: Slava Ukraini vs Glory to Ukraine, which may elucidate) Sceptre (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Alšėniškiai → Holszański – It's rather clear that the Slavic form is more popular, which cannot be surprising because the family was Ruthenised early on. I would prefer "Holshansky" because it's used by Robert I. Frost and Zenonas Norkus. But "Holszański" seems to be the most popular version in Google Scholar and Lithuanian authors of Lithuanian Millenium. History, art and culture, seems to prefer "Holszański" version of the name Marcelus (talk) 23:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – The Exorcist (film) → The Exorcist – It is time, in fact it is long past time, to reopen this discussion, for two reasons. First, rather than rely on Google hits, we have our own pageview data, which shows that the article about the film gets, on average, 13 times as many visits a day as the the article about the franchise (You only need to look at the y axis). This establishes rather beyond doubt that even if the book came first, the PRIMARYTOPIC here is the original movie. The public overwhelmingly associates the two words with Linda Blair bleeding all over her hospital gown, barfing pea soup all over Jason Miller, masturbating with a crucifix and telling him to sodomize her, in so many words. Why we feel that "(film)" is necessary for that is beyond me. Second is the (ahem) unholy mess behind the second move, which is rather more of a merger since the two articles, again for reasons that are unclear, are largely duplicative of each other (itself a secondary argument for this whole move IMO). I think the idea was originally to have one for just the film series, but in July that was moved, apparently without awareness that the standalone title article exists as well, to cover the same subject of the franchise as a whole. Daniel Case (talk) 20:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Porter (railroad) → Porter (rail) – The universal international term is "railway", not "railroad", which is generally restricted to North America. But "rail" conveniently covers both of these without being specific to speakers of any variety of English per MOS:COMMONALITY and is just as commonly understood and appropriate. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Genkai Tokki: Seven Pirates → Seven Pirates – The remake is being released in English under the title "Seven Pirates H", so although the original technically wasn't released and the remake is the one being released in English I would move this to "Seven Pirates" to refer to the original, then obviously "Seven Pirates H" is the remake. The "Genkai Tokki" isn't in the english version. Also, "Seven Pirates" already redirects here. Muur (talk) 00:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:30, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Norte Chico civilization → Caral civilization – It's been suggested in multiple places that the article's name should be changed; see above for an argument for "Caral civilization" and here for "Caral" or "Caral-Supe civilization". In terms of Google Scholar, the results since 2010 are: *"Norte Chico civilization", 35 *"Caral civilization", 28 *"Caral-Supe civilization", 12 The trend does seem to be going towards Caral or Caral-Supe, the former is the official name used by the Peruvian government, and is far more common in Spanish than Norte Chico (per Google Scholar). I express no opinion. (t · c) buidhe 08:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Norse dragon → Germanic dragon – There is strong cultural overlap on this topic among the Germanic peoples regarding the role, appearance and terminology. Fafnir, one of the most famous dragons discussed here is part of a tradition attested in English, German and North Germanic sources. The term "Germanic" over "Norse" is the grouping used in pages such as "Dragon" and "European dragon" while also allowing us to cover dragons such as that in Beowulf, Niblungenlied and later Northumbrian folklore (which shares a lot of features with Norse dragons) so it is my preferred term (making Norse dragon a redirect.) Ingwina (talk) 08:05, 28 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – The Nymphs → Nymphs (band) – For the band article “The Nymphs”, the title is incorrect. The band’s name is simply “Nymphs”. I have been able to make all the appropriate edits to the page article content, but not for the article title that remains as “The Nymphs”. (Link below) The article title should either be: “Nymphs (Band)” (for the purpose of disambiguation with the term “Nymph”) or simply: “Nymphs”. My thought is that the former is the better suggestion. Apparently the page will need to be moved to accomplish this and thus the request here in the page move talk section. Is it possible to make this change? As a definitive source of record to backup the requested change, please see on Discogs where as an artist/band they are correctly listed as “Nymphs” and where cover artwork for all of their releases can be found with NONE incorporating the word “The” as part of the band’s name.[12] For the album article “The Nymphs”, the title is incorrect. The name of the album (which is self-titled) is simply “Nymphs”. I have been able to make all the appropriate edits to the page article content, but not for the article title that remains as “The Nymphs (album)”. (Link below). Also the links back to the Band Wiki page in the Album Infobox (x2) need to be updated to the corrected artist page article title move that I have requested (assuming that it gets approved). The article title should be: “Nymphs (Album)” (for the purpose of disambiguation with the term “Nymph”), including the word “Album” in title case, rather than all lower-case. Apparently the page will need to be moved to accomplish this and thus the request here in the page move talk section. Is it possible to make this change? As a definitive source of record to backup the requested change, please see on Discogs where both the artist and the album are simply “Nymphs”, not “The Nymphs” and where cover artwork for this release can be viewed. It does not incorporate the word “The” anywhere on it. It also does not appear on the back, either spine of the CD or on the barcode spine sticker from the manufacturer (UMG Distribution for Rock Candy Records/Geffen)[13]

References

  1. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/18/sports/autoracing/zhou-guanyu-f1-alfa-romeo.html
  2. ^ https://news.cgtn.com/news/2022-03-18/Exclusive-interview-Zhou-Guanyu-is-excited-for-his-F1-debut-on-Sunday-18vgPsJR7Lq/index.html
  3. ^ https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/f1/12569184/guanyu-weve-made-good-progress-since-testing
  4. ^ https://www.sportspromedia.com/news/alfa-romeo-f1-puma-kit-supplier-sponsorship/
  5. ^ https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2022%20Bahrain%20Grand%20Prix%20-%20Entry%20List.pdf
  6. ^ https://twitter.com/ZhouGuanyu24
  7. ^ "Aufzeichnungen der neuen RTL-Show "Zeig uns Deine Stimme"". RTL (in German). Mediengruppe RTL Deutschland. 9 March 2022. Retrieved 9 March 2022.
  8. ^ "Aufzeichnungen der neuen RTL-Show "Zeig uns Deine Stimme"". RTL (in German). Mediengruppe RTL Deutschland. 9 March 2022. Retrieved 9 March 2022.
  9. ^ "Aufzeichnungen der neuen RTL-Show "Zeig uns Deine Stimme"". RTL (in German). Mediengruppe RTL Deutschland. 9 March 2022. Retrieved 9 March 2022.
  10. ^ "Décret n° 2022-327 du 4 mars 2022 portant dénomination d'établissement public expérimental". www.legifrance.gouv.fr. 4 March 2022. Retrieved 2022-03-07.
  11. ^ "L'Université de Paris bientôt renommée Université Paris Cité". Le Monde.fr (in French). 15 February 2022. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
  12. ^ https://www.discogs.com/artist/548288-Nymphs
  13. ^ https://www.discogs.com/master/158141-Nymphs-Nymphs
– Thanks, HandOfKwll (talk)HandOfKwll *The above was copied directly from WT:RM (permalink). Formatting-only changes (diff) were then made to the above by myself, Special:PermaLink/1074286672 is the original. Primefac (talk) 13:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Leonese dialect → Leonese language – Leonese, along Asturian (titled as a language on Wikipedia), Mirandese (also titled as a language) and Extremaduran (same here), are all part of the same language: Asturleonese. However, they are not dialects, at least not Asturian and Leonese, see maps on the actual dialects of Asturleonese we have on Commons here: [30] [31] [32]. The situation of the Asturleonese variants could be compared to that of the Serbo-Croatian ones: Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian and Montenegrin are not dialects of a same language, but different standardized versions of the same language, which do not correspond to the dialectal split of Serbo-Croatian [33]. Similarily, Asturian is only the Asturleonese spoken in Asturias, Leonese is the Asturleonese spoken in the region of León, and so on (although I am not sure if the Asturleonese variants have been standardized, probably not). I'd say it is better to have consistency among articles, since there's no reason that we label Asturian, Mirandese and Extremaduran as languages but Leonese as a dialect. Another option could be something like "Leonese variants of Asturleonese" or "Leonese Asturleonese", but that's probably not very widely used on Wikipedia. Super Ψ Dro 16:44, 20 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 18:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 19:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – KiKi KaiKai → ? – Should this page be moved? English sources seem to disagree on what this game is titled. While they mostly agree to write it as two distinct words, they are split on capitalizing the middle Ks (KiKi KaiKai) or not (Kiki Kaikai). Normally in Japanese transcriptions, you don't capitalize letters mid-word unless it was an official stylization. I decided to do some research. Since this game was originally published only in Japanese (奇々怪界), I searched to find times it was officially published in English to see what it was titled. Here are the results: *Ki-Ki-Kai-Kai (Mobile, 2003) [34] *Ki Ki Kai Kai (Taito Legends 2, 2006) [35] *Ki Ki Kai Kai (Taito Legends Power-Up, 2006) [36] *KIKI KAIKAI (Arcade Archives, 2020) [37] though Hamster writes every game title in all capitals. Surprisingly, the game was almost always published as four distinct words! The problem is almost no sources currently write it like that (WP:COMMONNAME). But since it's a creative work, shouldn't we go with the title given by its creator? Interestingly, Heavenly Guardian, which was originally a planned 2008 sequel until it was rebranded, was originally titled Kiki KaiKai 2 (only one midword capital K) [38]. Great, as if we needed more confusion. Well anyways, I'm not sure what to go with: *A: KiKi KaiKai (current name) *B: Ki Ki Kai Kai (most common officially published English title) *C: Kiki Kaikai (commonname preferred two word split, but stylization removed) *D: Kiki KaiKai (used for planned 2008 sequel) Thoughts? TarkusABtalk/contrib 16:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Ivan Olshansky → Jonas Alšėniškis – There should be a Lithuanian name for this article about a Lithuanian noble. The name "Ivan Olshansky" (supposedly Slavic) is not used by any of the Slavic wikipedias (Russian wiki - Иван Ольгимундович Гольшанский (Ivan Olgimundovich Golshansky); Polish wiki - Iwan Olgimuntowic Holszański ; Belarusian wiki - Іван Альгімонтавіч Гальшанскі (Ivan Algimontovich Halshansky) Cukrakalnis (talk) 18:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 19:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Friuli Venezia Giulia → Friuli-Venezia Giulia – The region is commonly named this way, with the hyphen, as it includes two historically distinct entities, Friuli and Venezia Giulia. It is no surprise, that the it.Wikipedia article is named "Friuli-Venezia Giulia" and that all the largest Wikipedias (es.Wikipedia, pt.Wikipedia, fr.Wikipedia, de.Wikipedia, etc) feature articles on the subject with names including the hyphen. Checco (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 06:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – LGBT adoption → Adoption by same-sex couples – The article talks about people of the same sex adopting; it isn't about trans people adopting. It should follow the same logic behind the Same-sex marriage article and be named Adoption by same-sex couples. Both topics are about same-sex couples, not about transgender rights. It is not objective nor accurate to use the LGBT acronym in this article Heikocvijic (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Maidan Nezalezhnosti → Independence Square, Kyiv – As this is the English-language Wikipedia, I think we should use the English name ("Maidan" may be used a lot in English, but not "Maidan Nezalezhnosti"; most references to the full name in English tend to have the English translation given too). —AFreshStart (talk) 09:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Terebinth → Pistacia terebinthus – Terebinth does not only refer to Pistacia terebinthus. # In the sense of ancient usage of the term "terebinth", ancient Greeks refer to both P. terebinthus and P. atlantica as terebinth.[1] The anonymous user below thinks the ancient usage of the term is not important, but nearly half of the content of this page is about terebinth in Ancient texts. # In the sense of the terebinth tree that produces the terebinth resin, P. atlantica is the main source of the terebinth resin in the Mediterranean region, instead of P. terebinthus.[2][3] Again, half of the section "Uses" is about the terebinth resin. # In the sense of modern usage of the term "terebinth", the definition of "terebinth" by the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language is "any of several usually small trees of the genus Pistacia of the Middle East and the Mediterranean region", and P. atlantica is called Atlantic terebinth or simply terebinth in various sources.[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] #The content of this page itself contains descriptions of other species. For example, it mentions the terebinth resin was used at the foot of the Zagros Mountains, but P. terebinthus does not grow in Iran;[16][17][18] thus, it must refer to some other species such as P. atlantica. The imprecision of the title "terebinth" is self-evident. It is best to move this page to Pistacia terebinthus, and turn terebinth into either a disambiguation page including Pistacia terebinthus and Pistacia atlantica in the list, or a separate page introducing the terebinth trees in ancient Greek and Roman texts and the current uses of the terebinth resin. Neux-Neux (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Polish hussars → Winged hussars – Per WP:COMMONNAME, the name Winged hussars should be prioritized over Polish hussars, because the name Winged hussars is more commonly used, e.g. on Google, Google Scholar and Google Books. On Google, Winged Hussars has about 197.000 results [41], while Polish hussars has about 48.000 results [42]. On Google Scholar, there are about 141 results for Polish hussars [43] and about 156 results for Winged hussars [44]. In Google Books, there are about 1,830 results for Winged hussars [45] and 1,770 for Polish hussars [46]. Moreover, Polish hussars as a term also include Polish hussar regiments in the Napoleonic Wars, in addition to the 10th Hussar Regiment in the II Corps (Poland) during World War II. This article definitely does not cover them, as something totally different is in mind, which is the Winged hussars. Cukrakalnis (talk) 17:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Megami Tensei → Shin Megami Tensei – I think there is an argument for moving the series article to "Shin Megami Tensei" which appears to be the commonly used current name across all regions, similar to how "Super Mario" became the name of that series going forward. It seems unlikely they are going to go back to "Megami Tensei" ever for any future games, with the original series being the only ones that use the "Megami Tensei" names. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Quench (disambiguation) → Quench – Quench currently redirects to Quenching as a result of a move although it is not flagged as that. However there is no case for quenching in materials science being the primary topic of quench. In particular, a magnetic quench is of growing interest with the increasing and notable use of superconducting magnets. Andrewa (talk) 09:08, 18 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:51, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Lega per Salvini Premier → Lega (Italy) – or Lega (political party) per WP:COMMONNAME. This party is never ever mentioned in the Italian nor English media with its full name, unless the article is specifically about the creation of such party and specifies its official name (also see the results of this search versus this one). Furthermore, 99% of the the times this article is wikilinked in another page on WP, it is always as either [[Lega per Salvini Premier|Lega]] or [[Lega per Salvini Premier|League]], because nobody wants to read its full official name. I prefer Lega (Italy) or Lega (political party) over League (Italy) for disambiguation purposes, since "league" is a very generic word in English (and "Lega" is also more commonly used to refer to this party even in English media). Yakme (talk) 11:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 16:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Battle of the Stugna River → Battle of the Stuhna River – Spelling according to the main article Stuhna: name of a river in Ukraine, spelled according to standard Ukrainian romanization per WP:UKR. The title term “battle of the Stugna River” does not occur in the only source cited here;[47] it does refer to the river in Ukraine by the Russian or Old East Slavic-derived “the Stugna” and “the Stugna River,” but it is a 1967 book, demonstrating its dated WP:POV language with the title referring to Kyivan Rus as “Medieval Russia.” The current title is not a WP:COMMONNAME, as it seems to appear in only a single source found in Google Scholar[48] and the term returns only 27 results in Google Advanced Book Search (per WP:GOOG),[49] but having loaded all of them I can only find the phrase in a single one (many can’t be searched inside).  —Michael Z. 19:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. Mike Cline (talk) 13:32, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Rainhill Trials → Rainhill trials – Per MOS:CAPS and WP:NCCAPS, we should use sentence case, not title case. This event is commonly referred to in sources as "the Rainhill trials" with lowercase trials, all through the 19th and 20th centuries. Recently there's a tendency toward more capitalization, but not enough to meet the criterion in MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon (talk) 03:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • (Discuss) – Macdonald (disambiguation) → Macdonald – I don't think there's a clear primary topic. All Google, Images and some Books results are for McDonald's, the restaurant. While the name gets around 2 thirds of views of things called Macdonald/McDonald, 2,047 for the name 793 for Pennsylvania, 264 for Ohio, 255 for Kansas, 66 for Manitoba, 62 for North Carolina, 22 for West Virginia, 14 for the electoral district, 6 for Missouri and 5 for the crater, the restaurant gets 139,042 and Macdonald triad gets 13,927. The surname may be the original meaning but it doesn't seem primary especially when the "D" is capitalized. There is 1 given name namely Macdonald Carey so I have used "name" per WP:APOAT but Macdonald Carey could be moved to the DAB and we instead use Macdonald (surname) for the article. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malformed requests

Did you remember to submit your request by using {{subst:Requested move}}? See "Bot considerations"

Possibly incomplete requests

See "Request all associated moves explicitly"

References

References generally should not appear here. Use {{reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there.
  1. ^ Negbi, Moshe (1995). "Male and Female in Theophrastus's Botanical Works". Journal of the History of Biology. 28 (2): 317–332. ISSN 0022-5010.
  2. ^ Mills, J. S.; White, R. (1989). "The identity of the resins from the late bronze age shipwreck at Ulu Burun (Kaş)". Archaeometry. 31 (1): 37–44. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1989.tb01054.x. ISSN 0003-813X.
  3. ^ Lardos, Andreas; Prieto-Garcia, José; Heinrich, Michael (2011). "Resins and Gums in Historical Iatrosophia Texts from Cyprus – A Botanical and Medico-pharmacological Approach". Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2. doi:10.3389/fphar.2011.00032/full. ISSN 1663-9812.
  4. ^ Duke, James A. (2007-12-26). Duke's Handbook of Medicinal Plants of the Bible. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-8493-8203-1.
  5. ^ Lardos, Andreas; Prieto-Garcia, José; Heinrich, Michael (2011). "Resins and Gums in Historical Iatrosophia Texts from Cyprus – A Botanical and Medico-pharmacological Approach". Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2: 32. doi:10.3389/fphar.2011.00032. ISSN 1663-9812. PMC 3130153. PMID 21772820.
  6. ^ Esmaeili, Saeideh; Hemami, Mahmoud-Reza; Goheen, Jacob R. (2019-08-02). "Human dimensions of wildlife conservation in Iran: Assessment of human-wildlife conflict in restoring a wide-ranging endangered species". PLOS ONE. 14 (8): e0220702. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220702. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 6677293. PMID 31374100.
  7. ^ Amiri Chayjan, Reza; Kaveh, Mohammad (2013-03-14). "Physical Parameters and Kinetic Modeling of Fix and Fluid Bed Drying of Terebinth Seeds". Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 38 (3): 1307–1320. doi:10.1111/jfpp.12092. ISSN 0145-8892.
  8. ^ Ayalon, Etan (2015). "Twin-Screw Olive-Oil Presses from Israel". Israel Exploration Journal. 65 (1): 100–110. ISSN 0021-2059.
  9. ^ Martin, Louise Anne (1994). Hunting and herding in a semi-arid region: an archaeozoological and ethological analysis of the faunal remains from the Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic of the eastern Jordanian steppe (PDF). Vol. 1. PhD Thesis. University of Sheffield. p. 13.
  10. ^ Van Zeist, Willem; Bottema, Sytze (2009-03-01). "A palynological study of the Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel". Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. 18 (2): 105–121. doi:10.1007/s00334-008-0167-5. ISSN 1617-6278.
  11. ^ Aviva and Shmuel Bar-Am (2013-02-23). "Israeli history: it's all about roots". The Times of Israel. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  12. ^ "Plants of the Bible: Mt. Atlas mastic tree". Flowers in Israel. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  13. ^ "Flora and Fauna in Israel". Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2001-09-03. Retrieved 2022-03-03.
  14. ^ "Tree of the year 2005: Terebinth tree - Pistacia atlantica" (PDF). Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment, Forestry Department, Cyprus. Retrieved 2022-03-03.
  15. ^ Martin, Chris A. "Pistacia atlantica". Virtual Library of Phoenix Landscape Plants. Arizona State University. Retrieved 2022-03-02.
  16. ^ "Pistacia terebinthus L." Catalogue of Life. Retrieved 2022-03-09.
  17. ^ "Pistacia terebinthus L." Plants of the World Online. Kew Science. Retrieved 2022-03-09.
  18. ^ "Plant list of Iran". Flora of Iran. Central Herbarium of Tehran University. Retrieved 2022-03-09.

See also

The current Wikipedia time is:
13:37, Saturday, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
To update time purge the cache!
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&oldid=1077508579"