Wikipedia:Media copyright questions

Media copyright questions
Welcome to the Media Copyright Questions page, a place for help with image copyrights, tagging, non-free content, and related questions. For all other questions please see Wikipedia:Questions. How to add a copyright tag to an existing image On the description page of the image (the one whose name starts File:), click Edit this page. From the page Wikipedia:File copyright tags, choose the appropriate tag: For work you created yourself, use one of the ones listed under the heading "For image creators". For a work downloaded from the internet, please understand that the vast majority of images from the internet are not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. Exceptions include images from flickr that have an acceptable license, images that are in the public domain because of their age or because they were created by the United States federal government, or images used under a claim of fair use. If you do not know what you are doing, please post a link to the image here and ask BEFORE uploading it. For an image created by someone else who has licensed their image under an acceptable Creative Commons or other free license, or has released their image into the public domain, this permission must be documented. Please see Requesting copyright permission for more information. Type the name of the tag (e.g.; {{Cc-by-4.0}}), not forgetting {{ before and }} after, in the edit box on the image's description page. Remove any existing tag complaining that the image has no tag (for example, {{untagged}}) Hit Publish changes. If you still have questions, go on to "How to ask a question" below. How to ask a question To ask a new question hit the "Click here to start a new discussion" link below. Please sign your question by typing ~~~~ at the end. Check this page for updates, or request to be notified on your talk page. Don't include your email address, for your own privacy. We will respond here and cannot respond by email. Note for those replying to posted questions If a question clearly does not belong on this page, reply to it using the template {{mcq-wrong}} and, if possible, leave a note on the poster's talk page. For copyright issues relevant to Commons where questions arising cannot be answered locally, questions may be directed to Commons:Commons:Village pump/Copyright.
Click here to start a new discussion

(For help, see Wikipedia:Purge)

Non-feee image resolution

Why non-free images should always be low resolution? Vitaium (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

We are trying to make sure they meet US fair use allowances, which one facet is the impact on the commercial value of the work. Using a low resolution image rather than high is going to have a far less impact on the commercial value of the work itself. --Masem (t) 12:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Adding a non free fair use image in an article

I wanted to ask whether I can now add a non-free fair use image in an article Kyun Utthe Dil Chhod Aaye. Earlier when I added the image, it got a copyright strike as I didn't add correct tags and also the now article was just a draft at that time. So please inform me what all tags do I have to add in the following image: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-K6lTaX1Ni60/YB_4ZW3OFAI/AAAAAAAAFAQ/c0JfZdgMoww--tNXjNlLSvie4A-dZPtcACNcBGAsYHQ/s760/Kyun%2BUtthe%2BDil%2BChhod%2BAaye%2BWP%2B00.jpg Please revert back if possible on my talk page. -Natureisablessing (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Natureisablessing. If the file you want to add is going to be used for primary identification purposes in the main infobox of the article, then it should be OK. Generally, a screenshot of the opening title card seems to be preferred for identification purposes in the main infobox for articles about TV programs as explained in MOS:TVIMAGE, but a promotional poster for the show should also be OK. If you uploaded the same file before, then you might not need to upload it again. Files that are deleted aren't really gone forever and can be restored by an administrator. So, if the file you previously uploaded got deleted for some reason (e.g. WP:F5), you can request that it be restored at WP:REFUND. Once it's been restored, update the non-free use rationale and anything else on the file's page as needed and then add the file to the article. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:11, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Flags and historical data

Hi. I am writting, together with my very passionate abouy history 13 years old son, a book about historical events for worldwide countries. We use Wikipedia for documenting period 1840-present time for each country in order to extract a certain set of data: political status, flags image, surface of the country, population, capital city and certain data events in format dd.mm.yyyy. We do not describe the events, just extract de event data. We do have our completely different way of arranging those data. The book will be published for commercial purposes. Do we need to mention in our bibliography the authors of the articles and the bibliography they used for each and every country or it is enough to mention Wikipedia as a source? Thanks.

Ion Giscan Engineer Bucharest Romania — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A58:821F:8000:B453:4574:39D8:2DB8 (talk) 06:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ion. I believe the information you need can be found in Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content. — Marchjuly (talk) 11:01, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Whether March of the Volunteers lyrics/sheet music are copyrighted

User:George Ho has raised the question of whether or not the lyrics of the Chinese national anthem are copyrighted and thus unsuitable to include on Wikipedia, as we have been discussing at the article's Talk page. His point is that the writer of the lyrics Tian Han died in 1968, so that under PRC law (where the term is author's death +50 years), the lyrics would still have been copyrighted on the WP:URAA restoration date in 1996 of Chinese copyrights in the United States. This would mean that the U.S. copyright is in effect for 95 years from the first publication date of the lyrics (1934), so that they are still currently copyrighted in the U.S. even though they are no longer copyrighted in the PRC.

As discussed in more detail on the Talk page, at Wikisource on the bottom of the page, there is a justification for use given which says that according to PRC copyright law effective in 1990 the lyrics should have been in the public domain in 1996 on the URAA restoration date applicable to the PRC. This is stated to be because of the exemption in Article 5(1) for: "laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of a legislative, administrative or judicial nature; and their official translations".

George Ho disagrees with this as he says the lyrics of the national anthem are not such documents as exempted in the above law. I somewhat agree, though the 1978 version (there are two versions, 1978 version and current version) of the lyrics and possibly the sheet music do appear in the text of a pre-1996 legislative document. But we seem to disagree whether the exemption would apply to the 1978 lyrics and sheet music as a result.

I would very much appreciate opinions on the copyright status of the works in question as it relates to their inclusion on Wikipedia. Fiwec81618 (talk) 04:34, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

I can't think of a title.

Hi, I added a picture of a ident from the 2017 "Oneness" set on BBC One in the History of BBC television idents page, and it has been removed, I'd like to ask if one of these two options can be carried out:

1. Undo the edit on the page, putting it back or
2. Removing the picture from BBC One 'Oneness' idents as it's the same picture as the one that got removed on the former page.

If the answer is not clear-cut, I'm fine with trying to find a solution with you. --Jamo62 (talk) 09:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

The bot that removed the file left an edit summary which linked to WP:NFC#Implementation. Did you go to that page and check what is written there? The bot is removing the file per WP:NFCCE because it has not been provided with a non-free use rationale specific to that particular use, and the bot will keep removing the file every time it re-added to that article without adding a corresponding rationale for the use to the file’s page. The file has a rationale for its use in the other article which is why the bot isn’t removing it from there, and you probably shouldn’t remove it as well. Adding the missing rationale should stop the bot, but adding a rationale doesn’t necessarily make a non-free use valid per WP:JUSTONE and the file’s use in the article could still be challenged if someone feels the use isn’t justified per WP:NFCCP. If you have more questions about the bot, you can always ask JJMC89 because he’s the administrator operating the bot. — Marchjuly (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Alright. --Jamo62 (talk) 11:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Public Domain Status

Hello, fellow editors. I am wondering about the status of this film here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-4XchLQq9A&list=PLfsB4bwNClRK6_glHaK4qN0TnkpBRQy-B, called Grande Ole Opry. As you can see, it is on YouTube but there is no indication of any copyright status. It was released by Republic Pictures. It is a long shot but is there a chance it has lapsed into the public domain like so many other B-movies? Gandalf the Groovy (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

@Gandalf the Groovy Sorry but you're out of luck, copyright was registered in 1940 and renewed in 1967 [1], so it'll be in copyright until 1 January 2036. Nthep (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Photograph of Robert Beverly Hale on si.edu

Hello, I wanted to upload an image of Robert Beverly Hale to the English Wikipedia article about him, but I have no idea how copyright works, so I thought perhaps posting a link to the image here would help me determine whether it was okay to post.

The photograph was taken by Peter A. Juley. It's available on the Smithsonian Institution Archive website— I hope that means I can upload it.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prismboy7 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

It says "Usage Conditions Apply", which, if you follow that link, elaborates that to mean "may only be used for personal, educational, and other non-commercial uses consistent with the principles of fair use". From that and the rest of the page it sounds like the copyright is still held by Peter Juley's heirs or by the firm Peter A. Juley & Son. Without additional information regarding date of creation or publication, we can't consider it free which means we can't put it on Commons. Now, all that said, it probably is usable locally here on Wikipedia (in a much reduced size--scale it down before uploading) under fair use. The more elaborate guidelines regarding non-free images can be found at WP:NFCI. It's been a while since I've uploaded an image, but I'm pretty sure the File Upload Wizard sets up all necessary non-free templates as long as you answer the questions appropriately. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

@Prismboy7 Agree with VernoWhitney, upload it to WP as non-free [2]. Size is fixed after awhile by a bot, so you don't need to bother with that. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:18, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you both very much. I've uploaded and inserted the image into the article, and I hope I'm notified as soon as possible if there's anything wrong.

Prismboy7 (talk) 07:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)