See also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_talk:Common.js/Archive_19#Execute_custom_scripts_per_page

Wouldn't it make more sense to have pages list the gadgets they want to run on them, rather than gadgets listing the pages they want to run on? For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Gadget-switcher.js currently loads and runs on every page, but only does stuff if the page contains an element with class "switcher-container". If pages chose their gadgets, then pages that needed that could put something like {{LOADGADGET:switcher}} somewhere on them. It's not possible for that gadget to choose its pages, since any page could have a switcher-container element added to it, and it wouldn't be practical to update the gadget each time.

There's value to both.

When thinking about a single page, I agree being able to specify it on the page is a lot more useful, practical and maintainable (such gadget definition should not be concerned with which pages want that module).

However there is also a use for loading modules declaratively based on wider semantics. Not a plain page name, but for example based on namespace, title pattern, or details about the current user or page. As well as potentially for pages that don't exist (though MediaWiki:Noarticletext could be ab/used for that).

Please find the solution. I think we really need an option to avoid gadgets load on mobiles, as we have in personal scripts.

At WMSE, we could have used this recently. For WikiGap, we wanted to add a signup button to https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Skrivstuga/WikiGap. There was a gadget for this, but it had been disabled since it was loaded on all pages, but only actually used on a few. With @Nirmos's help, we managed to get it up and running for the event, but as this could be useful in the future, it would be good to be able to enabled the gadget only for certain pages.

So, this task is kind of two-pronged in that there's partly an extension of MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition (see T145997 for an example) that's being discussed, and partly per-page loading with for example
<load module="ext.gadget.MyAmazingGadget"/> that would be added to a page's wikitext. While an extension to MediaWiki:Gadgets-definition would be a lot more powerful and be of use for more gadgets, I assume that this would also be more difficult.

Now, I'm not a MediaWiki developer, so I may be completely wrong here, but it seems to me that the per-page loading would be really easy to do, as all the pieces needed are already available, for example a function to add modules to a page (OutputPage::addModules?). @Krinkle, are there any actual difficulties with allowing per-page loading, or is it just that someone needs to write the code for this?

@Imarlier, is there any chance that the Performance team could schedule this for an upcoming quarter?

@Nirmos There are no specific difficulties that I am aware of at this time. However, there is still the aspects of maintenance overhead, system complexity, and user/developer friendliness. These aspects may inform other solutions to be found instead.

For now, un-tagging Performance-Team since we don't maintain Gadget extension. The Gadgets extension uses a system called ResourceLoader internally which we do maintain, but from what I can tell, the feature talked about in this task would not involve changes to ResourceLoader.

Change 624517 had a related patch set uploaded (by BrandonXLF; owner: BrandonXLF):
[mediawiki/extensions/Gadgets@master] Add support for namespaces in definintions

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/624517

@BrandonXLF Based on your interest in the UseResource extension, perhaps you'd like to work on or help with this task instead?

Note that the Gadgets extension is currently lacking an active owner, someone to make sure it works week-afte-week, that new bugs are fixed, and that all the features we've put into it in the past will keep working even when the world around us is changing (browsers, operating systems, other MW features, etc.) Taking on additional features might be difficult until an active owner is found. But when there is someone active and willing to work on it, like yourself, that might make it easier for us all to get the ball rolling again.

@Krinkle How would I work on this if there's no active owner? I would love to work on this as it could solve the same issues that the UseResource extension can, but if there's no one to review my commits what's the point?

@BrandonXLF Yeah, I would not recommend writing a lot of code now (as much as I'd like to see that). But your word here that you'd be interested in helping with this, which you have now given, I think is enough for me to try to start some conversations. I can't promise anything, but I hope to tell you something within a few weeks!

Sounds good, hoping for the best!

Change 747112 had a related patch set uploaded (by SD0001; author: SD0001):

[mediawiki/extensions/Gadgets@master] Allow specifying action pages in definitions

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/747112

Change 747112 merged by jenkins-bot:

[mediawiki/extensions/Gadgets@master] Allow specifying page actions in definitions

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/747112

@Johan, what do you say, do we need to publish this?

@IKhitron: In case you're thinking about Tech News (not sure), please see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tech/News/For_contributors - thanks!

Don't understand what are you trying to say.

Is there a list of all accepted action values somewhere? E.g. is there a way to load a gadget only when viewing diffs?