Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates

Featured and good topics in Wikipedia A featured topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles). A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic. This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the featured and good topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic. If you would like to ask any questions about your topic and the featured/good topic process before submitting it, visit Wikipedia talk:Featured and good topic candidates. Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Featured and good topic questions. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. The featured and good topics director, GamerPro64, or his delegates Sturmvogel 66 and Aza24, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived. To contact the FTC director and delegates, please leave a message on the FTC talk page, or use the {{@FTC}} notification template elsewhere. You may want to check previous archived nominations first: Purge the cache to refresh this page

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists Featured pictures Featured topics Good content: Good articles Good topics Featured and good topic tools: Topic criteria Topic candidates Topic removal candidates Nomination procedure Topic log Topics on the Main Page Former topics Topic questions

Nomination procedure To create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button. Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic. For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure. Supporting and objecting Please review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured and good topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link). If you approve of a nomination, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons. Supports that clearly evaluate the criteria will be weighted more than those that do not. If you oppose a nomination, write '''Oppose''' or '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to fix the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it. For a topic to be promoted to featured or good topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate.

Featured topic nominations

Billboard number-one country songs (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Billboard number-one country songs for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2021

Billboard magazine has published charts ranking the top-performing country music songs in the United States since 1944. The first country chart was published under the title Most Played Juke Box Folk Records in the issue of the magazine dated January 8, 1944, and tracked the songs most played in the nation's jukeboxes. Billboard added a second chart in 1947 based on retail sales, and a third in 1949 based on radio airplay. The jukebox chart was discontinued in 1957, and the following year, the remaining two charts were dropped and replaced with a chart, initially entitled Hot C&W Sides, which combined sales and airplay data into one overall ranking. This chart was renamed Hot Country Singles in 1962, Hot Country Singles and Tracks in 1990, and Hot Country Songs in 2005. In 1990, its methodology changed to use only airplay data from country music radio stations. In 2012, this changed again to use data from stations of all formats as well as sales and streaming information. At the same time, a new Country Airplay chart was introduced, which continued the former methodology of tracking plays on country stations only.

Contributor(s): ChrisTheDude

Adding the list for 2021, which has just been promoted to FL, to the existing topic...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:24, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support: Keeping up this stunning body of work with the next iteration. Great job! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support: Outstandig work as always. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support. Fantastic work. FrB.TG (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support: Great work as always! -- Pseud 14 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Preity Zinta

Preity Zinta is an Indian actress and entrepreneur primarily known for her work in Hindi films. After graduating with degrees in English honours and criminal psychology, Zinta made her acting debut in Dil Se.. in 1998. She soon became a popular star and established herself as one of the leading actresses of Hindi cinema, receiving recognition for roles that were often deemed culturally defiant and for her unconventional screen persona. Zinta has won several accolades for her work in films, including two Filmfare Awards, and her performance in the Canadian drama Heaven on Earth (2008) earned her the Silver Hugo Award for Best Actress from the Chicago International Film Festival. Apart from acting, in 2004 Zinta was the only witness amidst a group of film stars to testify against the Indian mafia, for which she was awarded the Godfrey Phillips National Bravery Award. Her film appearances became fewer when she ventured into business; she has been a co-owner of the Indian Premier League cricket team Punjab Kings since 2008, and the owner of the South-African T20 Global League cricket team Stellenbosch Kings since 2017.

| discuss 3 articles Preity Zinta
Filmography Awards and nomination

Contributor(s): Shahid

This group of articles is an overview of the life, career, and achievements of one of India's biggest stars at one time. The main article is the first Wikipedia article on an Indian actor that was ever promoted to FA, and its success, as many great editors have told me, inspired them to improve other articles on Indian stars. My wikifriends and I have been keeping an eye on this article, updating and improving it throughout the years. Her filmography was promoted to FL by a prolific editor, FrB.TG. Just a few hours ago, the list of her accolades has been promoted to FL as well, so I figured I should give it a try here as well. --Shahid • ^Talk2me 19:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support: Looks like it has all the parts that an actor topic generally does. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 20:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support Covers all the necessary articles that an actor topic usually has. AryKun (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support. Panini! • 🥪 22:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support Comments remove Forbes per WP:RSP, always cite Sify as publisher solely on any of the refs, change The Vancouver Sun to Vancouver Sun and Washington Post to The Washington Post, always cite NDTV as publisher for those refs and dates need to be consistently in the DMY format. These comments should make it clear that my issues are with the references; the prose is solid and MOS has been followed well, great job working so hard on these articles! --K. Peake 21:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

  @Kyle Peake: All points addressed. Thank you, Shahid • ^Talk2me 21:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

  Shshshsh It is good to see that you have responded in due course, yet ref 199 of the main Preity Zinta article is incorrectly formatted currently and ref 76 of filmography is using the wrong date formatting. --K. Peake 07:42, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

  @Kyle Peake: My bad. Issues fixed. Ref. 76 on the other page has been replaced. Shahid • ^Talk2me 09:54, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Good topic nominations

Paper Mario (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Paper Mario for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam

Paper Mario is a video game series and part of the Mario franchise, developed by Intelligent Systems and produced by Nintendo. It combines elements from the role-playing, action-adventure, and puzzle genres. Players control a paper cutout version of Mario, sometimes with allies, on a quest to defeat the antagonist, primarily Bowser. The series consists of six games and one spin-off.

| discuss 8 articles Paper Mario series
Paper Mario Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door Super Paper Mario Paper Mario: Sticker Star Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam Paper Mario: Color Splash Paper Mario: The Origami King

Contributor(s): Panini!

Satisfies WP:GT? and all the same reasons of the last nomination. However, I've gone out of my way to do this in retaliation of Bryanrutherford0: "...this proposal is missing Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam. It's another game in, and it seems odd to leave it out here, though I get that it's a "crossover" spin-off and not exactly part of the series proper. It'd be an easy support with the last game included, but I'm not sure I can support without." I just thought I'd stop by and do a "well, take that" sort of thing, you know? I updated the text intro as well. --Panini! • 🥪 03:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support: An easy support now, for me. ;) -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:28, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

• Strong Support Panini has put hours and hours of effort into these articles allowing them to be perfect. I see absolutely no reason to not deny this simple addition. This is an incredible accomplishment and I am proud to have reviewed a part of it myself. GG. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 15:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support. AryKun (talk) 09:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support: My favorite video game ever is Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door! Great work on this topic! --Christian (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Mountain pigeon

Mountain pigeons are four species of birds in the genus Gymnophaps in the pigeon family Columbidae. They are found on islands in eastern Indonesia and Melanesia, where they inhabit hill and montane forest. They mostly have dull grey, white, or chestnut-brown plumage, with bright red skin around the eyes being their most distinctive feature. Males and females mostly look alike, but the Papuan mountain pigeon shows slight sexual dimorphism. Mountain pigeons are very social and are usually seen in flocks of at least 10–40 birds, although some species can form flocks of more than 100 individuals. They are generally quiet and do not make many vocalisations. However, they make a distinctive whooshing noise while leaving their high-altitude roosts to feed in the morning. Mountain pigeons are arboreal (living in trees) and feed on a wide variety of fruit like figs and drupes, mainly foraging for food in the canopy. All four species are listed as being of least concern on the IUCN Red List.

| discuss 5 articles Mountain pigeon
Papuan mountain pigeon Pale mountain pigeon Buru mountain pigeon Seram mountain pigeon

Contributor(s): AryKun

A self-contained genus topic with a clearly defined scope that I've been working on for about four months now. Four GAs and one FA, all of them very recently promoted. This series contains all the published info I was able to find and is likely the most comprehensive work about the genus you could find. --AryKun (talk) 08:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support: The genus and all four species, joined by a category for the genus, all at quality. Great work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support Comments the main article features usages of "they" too close to each other, especially in the lead, while this applies to the other ones for the term "it". Make sure date formatting is consistent for all of them and the distribution/habitat section should be merged with the above in Buru and Seram mountain pigeon articles per overly short size, also the following section on Seram has two consecutive paras both comprising one sentence; that needs to be worked on. I will support once these issues are fixed and honestly, top job working so hard on finding all this information from fully reliable sources! --K. Peake 07:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

I've merged some of the smaller subsections in the articles. The date formatting is yyyy-mm-dd everywhere where that much info is provided and yyyy where I couldn't find month and day. I can't really do much about "they" and "it", I've tried to vary the nouns and pronouns, but only so many you can use. It's a bit like using "he", "she", or "they" in a bio, you can't really change it around beyond a point. The distribution sections can't be merged anywhere else and honestly are best left as a small para. AryKun (talk) 10:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

AryKun Thanks for working on the articles and I am fine with the usage of those words upon further consideration, yet the date formatting layout still remains inconsistent, for example using 11 November 2021 and 2021-11-17 in this article. --K. Peake 12:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Kyle Peake Okay, I've gone through all the articles and replaced dd month yyyy dates with yyyy-mm-dd (it was the cite iucn ref defaults that formatted them that way). AryKun (talk) 10:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Support, I love to see topics about animals. They're definetely more important than video games, to say the least. Panini! • 🥪 17:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Interstate 40 in Tennessee

In the U.S. state of Tennessee, Interstate 40 (I-40) travels 455 miles (732 km) from west to east, passing through each of the state's Grand Divisions and physiographic provinces, and serving its three largest cities of Memphis, Nashville, and Knoxville. It is the longest interstate highway in the state, and contains five auxiliary routes. The Tennessee stretch is also the longest of the eight states through which the highway traverses. The stretch of I-40 between Memphis and Nashville is known as "Music Highway", passing through a region instrumental in the development of American popular music, and the route was also the subject of the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe.

Contributor(s): Bneu2013

This is a series of interrelated articles connected to the stretch of Interstate 40 in Tennessee, arguably the most important highway in the state. I have brought all of them to GA status, and hope to bring additional related articles to GA status in the near future. --Bneu2013 (talk) 13:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: Maybe I'm missing something, but shouldn't this proposal also need Interstate 140 (Tennessee) and Interstate 240 (Tennessee)? -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose—for two reasons. First, this is an incomplete topic that is missing two articles, as organized. More importantly, I lean against such narrow topics. There is a lot more to I-40 than just its Tennessee segment, and I would prefer to handle it as a GT/FT on a national level. I really wouldn't support a topic on a state level unless it was all of Tennessee's Interstates. Even if my second preference didn't gain wider support, the issue of two missing I-x40 highways in the Volunteer State, neither of which is GA or better, is fatal to this nomination at this time. Imzadi 1979 → 23:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

• Oppose per above, also if this is ever re-nominated with more article included, you should not be using refs in the infobox and lead for information that is sourced in the body already --K. Peake 14:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose per BR and Imzadi. It's just not complete; the topic's main article is also in need of copyediting, particularly in the Route description. SounderBruce 06:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
• Oppose I don't necessarily have a problem with statewise topics for highways, but this topic excludes two articles that are clearly necessary for it to be complete. AryKun (talk) 08:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Madonna performances

American singer Madonna has performed on eleven concert tours, nineteen one-off concerts, nine benefit concerts, and three music festivals. Her 1985 debut concert tour, The Virgin Tour, was held in North America only and went on to collect more than US $5 million. In 1987 she performed on the worldwide Who's That Girl World Tour, which visited Europe, North America and Japan, and earned $25 million. 1990's Blond Ambition World Tour was dubbed as the "Greatest Concert of the 1990s" by Rolling Stone magazine and earned over US $62.7 million. In 1993, Madonna visited Israel and Turkey for the first time, followed by Latin America and Australia, with The Girlie Show, and did not tour again until the Drowned World Tour in 2001; she grossed more than US $75 million with summer sold-out shows and eventually played in front of 730,000 people throughout North America and Europe. 2004's Re-Invention World Tour earned Madonna the "Backstage Pass Award" in recognition of having the top-grossing tour of the year, with ticket sales of nearly US $125 million. Madonna's next tours broke world records: The 2006 Confessions Tour grossed over US $194.7 million; with approximately US $411 million in ticket sales, the Sticky & Sweet Tour (2008–2009) became the highest-grossing tour of all time, and still remains the highest-grossing tour ever for a female artist. The MDNA Tour (2012) completed as the tenth highest-grossing tour of all time with US $305 million, the second highest for among female artists at the time, only behind the singer's own Sticky & Sweet. Her 2015–2016 Rebel Heart Tour was an all-arena tour which grossed $169.8 million from 1.045 million attendance. The singer's most recent outing, 2019–2020's Madame X Tour, was reported to have grossed over $36,385,935 from an audience of 124,655. All of Madonna's tours have been critically appreciated.

Madonna has also embarked on several promotional concerts to promote her studio albums, as well as performing award shows and benefit concerts like Live Aid (1985), Live 8 (2005) and Live Earth (2007). In 2012, she headlined the Super Bowl XLVI halftime show, which at that time was the most-watched halftime show in history. Madonna remains the highest-grossing solo touring artist of all time, with over $1.5 billion earned from her concert tours throughout her career.

| discuss 14 articles Madonna live performances
The Virgin Tour Who's That Girl World Tour Blond Ambition World Tour The Girlie Show Drowned World Tour Re-Invention World Tour Confessions Tour Sticky & Sweet Tour The MDNA Tour Rebel Heart Tour Madame X Tour Super Bowl XLVI halftime show Madonna: Tears of a Clown

Contributor(s): IndianBio, 11JORN and Christian

The concert tours and live performances of American singer Madonna have become, according to some, a "cultural touch point" that remain a "unique animal" in terms of "striking a chord" with fans and generating media coverage. All the articles in this proposed topic pass the FA and/or GA criteria. --Christian (talk) 17:39, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

• Support. Impressive articles, quite complete, well referenced (bibliography and websites), well written and structured. Excellent work! Vera (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
• Support: Looks like it's got all the contents of Category:Madonna (entertainer) concerts at GA or better. I don't quite know why some of the one-offs have articles and others don't, but if the currently existing articles reflect the notability of the subjects, then this appears to be complete. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
• Support: per nom. Kekkomereq1 (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

• Support: All of them looks fine, and have GA or FA status. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
• Support Comment the usage of PR Newswire has got to be fixed per WP:RSP; however, I felt very proud to have reviewed a few of these detailed articles, nice work! --K. Peake 22:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello @Kyle Peake:! Could you please tell me on what article/source does the fixing need to be done? Also, thank you for your great reviews :--Christian (talk) 14:18, 10 February 2022 (UTC)D

The unreliable source mentioned is present in the articles for the Who's That Girl World Tour, Madame X Tour, Rebel Heart Tour and Super Bowl XLVI halftime show, also I have moved this nom to the top of the candidates since it's the newest. --K. Peake 07:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

I have removed this source @Kyle Peake:, let me know if it looks alright. --Christian (talk) 14:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

• Support – Looks good to me. Impressive work! Damian Vo (talk) 08:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support. Panini! • 🥪 22:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Kanye West studio albums (1st supplementary nomination)

This topic is already featured. It is being re-nominated to add additional items. See Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Kanye West studio albums for discussions of the topic's previous nominations. The additional items are:

1. Donda
2. Donda 2

| discuss 14 articles Kanye West studio albums
The College Dropout Late Registration Graduation 808s & Heartbreak (subtopic) My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy Watch the Throne Yeezus The Life of Pablo Ye (subtopic) Kids See Ghosts (subtopic) Jesus Is King Donda Donda 2

This topic's retention period was nearly a month ago, but I nominated Donda way back in October for GA status with this in mind. The album did take a while to get picked up, though it has passed now after a smooth review! Update since I made this additional nomination, West released his eleventh studio album Donda 2 that I brought to GA status and would also like to add to the topic, though it would be appropriate to know if everyone maintains their support votes now. --K. Peake 08:41, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support as the GA reviewer of Donda (with additional comment): I would suggest maybe changing the current topic image the Donda "cover art". Realmaxxver (talk) 09:04, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Realmaxxver I understand that you are making this point since it's the only new article, but shouldn't the image for the supplementary nomination be the same as the one for the actual topic? --K. Peake 10:30, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Pretty sure you are right. crossed out. Realmaxxver (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• Support Comments Unsure about Rap Mais reliability, it looks like a blog. The Source needs at least one wikilink. Page six → People magazine, very different. Remove Appleinsider, on their "about us" page: "Our editorial staff has wide latitude to review and report on what they want, how they want." Henceforth, there is no editorial review. I'm unsure about the reliability of Distractify as it is co-founded by a Youtuber, no editorial staff. When translated I can't be sure regarding Buro 24/7, I would stay away from these. Maybe the album notes can replace this source easily? Doubts regarding "Southpawer" source, but the same information can be found on a Billboard article, Hot New Hip Hop. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• I removed or replaced any of the questionable sources, also I must have missed The Source due to the large amount of refs so have wikilinked now and it is uncertain who added Page Six for the People ref because I remember that being the first from the publication and displaying as such, so I changed it back to citing People. --K. Peake 14:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

• I checked everything you did and now I support the nomination. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

• Support: Straightforward addition of the latest album to the existing topic. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:22, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• Support — Donda 2 is next! Keep up the good work! Damian Vo (talk) 08:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
• Director comment - Ok so this probably should have been closed sooner but with Donda 2 being a Good Article now, how about we make things easier and just add that to the topic after this review is closed? Is that cool with people here? GamerPro64 04:06, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

• GamerPro64 I have been going through a thought process that invokes this, being unsure whether to add the album to this nom or create a second supp nom when Donda has been added, as we don't know if the supporters here would vote the same way for Donda 2. Messages could be posted on their talk pages though and now that both options are on the table, which do you think is most appropriate? --K. Peake 07:49, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

• We can do a quick messaging with the reviewers to give a vote. Shouldn't be controversial. GamerPro64 13:24, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

• GamerPro64 Yes I agree, that is the process I had in mind too! --K. Peake 10:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support Great topic. And yes, I think Donda 2 should be included in this nomination before it closes. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 22:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
• Support with the inclusion of Donda 2: Electric Dondaloo. Panini! • 🥪 22:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

• @Realmaxxver:, MarioSoulTruthFan, Bryanrutherford0 and ChrisTheDude, do all of you support Donda 2 being part of this additional nomination? --K. Peake 21:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

I would vote against it, not putting into consideration any of your work, Kyle, which I know is outstanding. However, I believe it is quite soon? The album was not even released a month ago, shouldn't I breathe and gather more info? The full credits are not even out. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:29, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind comments MarioSoulTruthFan, but I would like to explain that the album is a Stem Player exclusive, so will not be able to chart as Billboard even acknowledged. Also, credits may take a while to be publicly available, if ever. K. Peake 08:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

I support adding both, with the same reasoning as before. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Kyle Peake I understand that now. It caused massive pirating since there is an evident lack of support, charts, and so on. Then support, just afraid it might change in the middle of the race. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Kyle Peake I just checked the source and I have some reservations regarding TorrentFreak since it is a blog and it's deeply connected with a piracy website. Cheers, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:44, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

MarioSoulTruthFan WP:RSP lists the source as reliable for topics like file sharing. --K. Peake 15:32, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Kyle Peake Not aware of it, thank you for letting me know. Support MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

• Support – While I think it's too early to have Donda 2 in good article status since it only been released for nearly a month, but you have my support. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 07:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime

King for a Day... Fool for a Lifetime is the fifth studio album by Faith No More, released on March 28, 1995. It was their first album recorded without longtime guitarist Jim Martin. The album spanned a range of genres, and spawned three singles—"Digging the Grave", "Ricochet" and "Evidence". Following Martin's departure, Trey Spruance was brought on to perform on the album, having also been in Mr. Bungle with singer Mike Patton. Production of the album was further marred by the band suffering a car accident, and by the absence of keyboard player Roddy Bottum, who was affected by the deaths of both his father and his friend Kurt Cobain. Spruance was replaced on the supporting tour by the band's former roadie Dean Menta. Critical reception to the album has been mixed, with its varied genres being cited as a detraction by several reviewers.

Contributor(s): Grapple X

This is my first music-based GT nomination but it should be comprehensive--the album and each of the singles have their own articles; no other songs are independently notable enough to warrant an article separate from the lead article. All articles have been assessed at GAN. The introductory paragraph is a new requirement since I was last at GTC--if it's too long I can trim it down, gauging the appropriate size was mostly guesswork. Thanks in advance to all having a look at this. --𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ X 15:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

• Comments: On "Digging the Grave" and "Evidence", wikilink exclaim.ca. On the album article wikilink Sydney Morning Herald; old.fnm.com. → FNM.com, "www.feastorfamine.com" → also fix this, source 47 has no publication, source 50 has no publication, author. On the Chart positions section of the album, use Template:Album chart. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

I've made a number of the other fixes, but I'm working on that conversion to the album chart template and it seems like that's going to mean losing the "weeks in chart" field which I can't see the template supporting; is this really necessary to go through the legwork of converting a table to a series of templates which will end up losing information? 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ X 18:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

You are supposed to have a commercial performance section on the album article, which covers that along with peaks, year-end charts, and certifications. Also no author, publication on source 48. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:34, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Ref 48 updated. If it's deemed a necessity for this topic I can add another prose section to the article but as it stands the information is still validly presented. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ X 09:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Never said the information was not valid at all, henceforth I propose the change by adding it to the reception or commercial performance. I just believe if an album spent 5,6 or 8 weeks on an album chart doesn't seem very relevant. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey MarioSoulTruthFan, I just wanted to check in if you feel comfortable supporting or if you have unaddressed concerns? Aza24 (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Aza24 I have yet one unaddressed concern. It's the only comment I have not yet struck. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 09:32, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• Support: Album and all singles at GA, linked by a navbox and supercategory. There doesn't appear to have been an associated tour, live album, or any other articles that should be here. Looks right to me! Good work! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
• Comments there are refs in the lead of the album for info that should be written out and sourced in the body; mention the heavy metal leanings under production and genre shuffle as part of reception. The info can remain in the lead too without the refs if you believe this is suitable, but everything there needs to be in the body. The image of the keyboardist belongs in the recording sub-section and the release history para should be in the section above, retitling to release and reception. You should use the chart templates like MarioSoulTruthFan mentioned and it does show weeks for ones such as Billboard and ARIA, also there's no organizations in brackets for numerous charts that these would add and put one in brackets for the year-end chart too. In all of the articles, you should not change the parameter on different occasions of citing the same publication, plus merge the release and reception sections on "Richochet" and "Evidence" due to their small sizes. I do not take stability issues with the pending request for the latter's article title to be changed since this does not affect the actual content and for the most parts, these articles are well-written and worthy of my congratulations for your hard work! --K. Peake 11:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

  I have moved the material cited in the lead of the main article down to the reception section and reworked it a little (I honestly thought that Rolling Stone quote was already there so thanks for pointing it out). The image you mention moving is something I'd like to keep where it is--I don't mind what the image actually is but keeping something under that heading is to break up what would otherwise be a longer stretch of only text, moving it to a higher heading would clash with the infobox and leave the later headings looking more like blocks of text. I'm happy to switch the image for a different one if you think something else is more relevant there but the placement is deliberate. The commons category has a few shots of the whole band if you think that would be a better option; I just went with Bottum as he's discussed specifically a bit. I would also still respectfully disagree on the idea of switching to chart templates rather than the existing table; this feels like a stylistic preference and I stand by the information being presented how it is. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 13:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

  The heavy metal info was not moved into the body, also the jazz and funk elements marking a departure is not sourced there and you missed the release and reception edits for all of the articles. It is fine not to use chart templates, but you need to add the organizations in brackets and used the chart names since writing Switzerland, Austria, etc. on there own does not provide proper information about these charts. --K. Peake 08:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

  Removed some more of the genre discussion as citing it would largely be synthesis, it adds little to nothing anyway so it's an easy cut. Chart names added alongside nations; went with country first, chart second as this should be easier to parse for the lay reader. I missed the "release and reception" edits as it's really just a WP:STYLEVAR issue, which I don't feel is germane to this nomination. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 13:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

  That is fine since the content is still there properly, though you still need to move the release info for the album article because release history sections are tables and this is prose, so it belongs elsewhere. Also, publications are still cited with inconsistency, such as FNM.com being italicised at points. --K. Peake 08:43, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

  Hey Kyle Peake, I just wanted to check in if you feel comfortable supporting or if you have unaddressed concerns? Aza24 (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

  All of the things that I have not crossed out are still yet to be covered. --K. Peake 06:30, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

  Combed through refs in the main article to ensure consistent ref formatting but anything else I feel boils down to WP:STYLEVAR and I don't a reason to change from one valid layout to another; this is a candidacy for a topic and should ideally focus on the criteria at WP:WIAGT. 𝄠ʀᴀᴘᴘʟᴇ ꭗ 09:49, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

• I will let this slide on the refs actually, but you still need to fix the release history part since that section being too small is not my only issue; it is also in prose which is not how history is even laid out. --K. Peake 18:08, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

• Director comment - This nomination has been open since September and only one declaration of support. There needs more votes here or this will have to be closed as not promoted. GamerPro64 16:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• Support meets the criteria. FrB.TG (talk) 08:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
• Support. Good Job! Panini! • 🥪 22:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Topic removal candidates

Iowa-class battleships

| discuss 10 articles Iowa-class battleships
USS Iowa (BB-61) USS Iowa turret explosion USS New Jersey (BB-62) USS Missouri (BB-63) USS Missouri grounding incident USS Wisconsin (BB-64) USS Illinois (BB-65) USS Kentucky (BB-66) Armament

Armament of the Iowa-class battleship was demoted on 4 December 2021, there is no effort to change that, and without it the topic fails criterion 3.b. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

• Remove: There seems to have been some discussion of merging that article into the main article, and if that were decided upon, then the rest of the topic could stand, but as long as the consensus is in favor of keeping the armaments article, the topic is now incomplete. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 15:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
• Remove this article is clearly a significant one for the topic and looking at the revision history, it is very clear nobody has been working towards FA candidacy again. --K. Peake 10:03, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

James Bond films

| discuss 27 articles James Bond films

Dr. No From Russia with Love Goldfinger Thunderball Casino Royale (1967) You Only Live Twice On Her Majesty's Secret Service Diamonds Are Forever Live and Let Die The Man with the Golden Gun The Spy Who Loved Me Moonraker For Your Eyes Only Octopussy Never Say Never Again A View to a Kill The Living Daylights Licence to Kill GoldenEye Tomorrow Never Dies The World Is Not Enough Die Another Day Casino Royale (2006) Quantum of Solace Skyfall Spectre No Time to Die

The grace period for No Time to Die has expired, and it is not nominated at GAN or FAC. Since the topic is not complete anymore, I don't see how it can retain featured status. (t · c) buidhe 11:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

• Remove: Yep, it has to go without the latest film. Hopefully someone will pick it up! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
• Remove I was actually about to check the retention periods to see if the one for this topic had been reached yet and since I cannot see evidence of any user(s) planning to promote the article for GA, this needs to be demoted. --K. Peake 11:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
• Remove as the topic is incomplete when No Time to Die hasn't been put up for FA or GA nominations. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:53, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
• Oh, that's a gun barrel the camera is inside of? I never knew what that was. But, yes, Remove per the criteria. Panini! • 🥪 19:19, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Saint Kitts and Nevis at the Olympics

Unlike the previous removal candidacy for the GT, a required article in Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2020 Summer Olympics is missing over two months after the event and is merely at start-class, definitely meaning this topic does not meet criterion 3.b. --K. Peake 21:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Remove: Definitely a necessary article for this topic. Hard to keep something like this up to date! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Remove per nom. Nobody seems to come forward regarding improving the last installments. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Remove per nom. Gog the Mild (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Djibouti at the Olympics

| discuss 9 articles Djibouti at the Olympics
Djibouti at the 1984 Summer Olympics Djibouti at the 1988 Summer Olympics Djibouti at the 1992 Summer Olympics Djibouti at the 1996 Summer Olympics Djibouti at the 2000 Summer Olympics Djibouti at the 2008 Summer Olympics Djibouti at the 2012 Summer Olympics Djibouti at the 2016 Summer Olympics

The article Djibouti at the 2020 Summer Olympics is not GA nominated yet over three months after the event and is merely at start-class, meaning this topic fails criterion 3.b. strongly. --K. Peake 21:15, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• Remove: Definitely a necessary article for this topic. Hard to keep something like this up to date! -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 21:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Remove per nom. Nobody seems to come forward regarding improving the last installments. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
• Remove per nom. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2022 (UTC)