Should either of the following revised sections be restored to this article?
A “Products” section, containing information about Freshpet products that have been covered by independent, reliable press sources such as the Wall Street Journal and New York Times.
A “Marketing” section, which describes the small number of marketing campaigns which attracted mainstream press coverage from the New York Times.
Does the first sentence in the lede, "a Russian state-controlled propagandist international television network" go against WP:NPOV? Should the article take sides and categorize it as "propaganda" or only report what news outlets categorize it as? Eden5 (talk) 06:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Add the tag {{rfc|xxx}} at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, {{rfc|xxx|yyy}}, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
