User talk:Jetstreamer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Reversion in TAP Portugal[edit]

I don't know what kind of reversion you may have made in TAP Portugal page according to your justification, since TAP Portugal doesn't fly to Tel Aviv, nor any other city in Asia. Nupest 0:10, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Finding reliable source[edit]

Hi jetstremar I am runaparvin you told me if I want to add anything I have to add a reliable source but how can I add a reliable source changing the destinations? Please help me adding a reliable source but I can't understand why not you changing the page of us-bangla airlines.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Runaparvin (talkcontribs)

Now 18th worst disaster[edit]

And still the 4th worst *at the time*. Please read the commit / diff information "Jetstreamer" before reverting changes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_New_Zealand_Flight_901 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Voigty (talkcontribs)

hi, here is the info for KLM year round Bilbao service[edit]

http://news.klm.com/air-france-klm-2014-15-winter-schedule-26-october-2014--28-march-2015-en/

Air France-KLM 2014-15 winter schedule (26 October 2014 – 28 March 2015) KLM continue to serve the routes launched this summer: to Bilbao (Spain) and Zagreb (Croatia).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.61.27.46 (talkcontribs)

Re: Ethiopian Airlines accidents and incidents[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Jetstreamer. You have new messages at Mattwheatley's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: 1979 Dniprodzerzhynsk mid-air collisіon[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Jetstreamer. You have new messages at Amateur55's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aeroflot 593[edit]

Hello Jetstreamer: Wow you caught me as Im about to go get some sleep :) so I guess to the point, lol..ok Aeroflot 593, about the Boeing 737 next to it, I'm agreeing with you, not 100 percent but certainly enough to tell you I see your point, and you are probably correct. About listing the Jessica Dubroff article there, I put an explanation as why she-or should I say, it-should be on the "see also" list right next to the link itself. I mean to me they were similar because they were both instances in which children were in the cockpit during a tragic circumstance. Anyways, take care, God bless you!...Antonio AeroCrazyLot Martin (loser's talk page) 13:55, August 30, 2016 (UTC)

Air Namibia accra/Lagos routing[edit]

Please note that Air Namibia 'resumes' the Accra route which they've abandoned in 2013. The Lagos-leg, however is new, therefore 'begins'. Please correct this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bundubear (talkcontribs) 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

I thought Aeromexico Connect took over Aeromexico’s main Monterrey-Las Vegas route. My apologies.

Robbie2448 Talk 12:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

JFK as a LATAM Chile destination from EZE.[edit]

Stop adding JFK as a destination from EZE with LATAM Chile, although bookable there is not a nonstop flight, if we start adding direct flights to airport's pages it will be a real mess as we will have to add every direct flight offered by an airline worldwide, there must be a change in the politics of publishing that. I will be reverting any changes you make because believe me that I am familiarized with Wikpedia's WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, so I cite the following: "However, avoid listing direct flights that contain a stop at a domestic hub, as virtually all of these are simply flights from one "spoke city" to a hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city. Furthermore, these flights often involve plane changes, despite the direct designation. Including these flights dramatically increases the length of destination listings, artificially inflates the airline's presence at a location and requires constant updating, as these "timetable direct" destinations have little rhyme or reason and may change as often as every week or two."

So it means that you are wrong and you should not post JFK as a destination with LATAM Chile because it is a stop at a domestic hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city.

Hello[edit]

Hi, you left a message on my talk page. I’m not sure weather you saw it because you never got back to me. I’m still learning and I am really not good at citing sources. I am not trying to vandalize here, I love Wikipedia and I’ve been reading for a long time. To me, contributing is my way to give back, I feel bad for not donating but contributing is my way to give back to the community. AdamT777 23:06 (UTC) 21 May 2020

Virgin australia is no longer flag carrier but is just a regional airline because of ditching wide-body aircrafts and long-haul loute.[edit]

"Today, it is any international airline with a strong connection to its home country or that represents its home country internationally, regardless of whether it is government-owned" on flag carrier's page, but Virgin Australia permanently ditched long-haul flight and wide-body aircrafts, that make Virgin as a only regional airline. (link:https://paxex.aero/virgin-australia-to-ditch-twin-aisle-fleet-focus-on-domestic-and-regional-service/)so you should make us delete Virgin on Australian flag carrier!!!Social25062 (talk) 5:53, January 2021 (UTC)

Austral Lineas Aereas Flight 046[edit]

Hi Jetstreamer, the final report mentions 55 passengers and 61 total fatalities. That's why i changed the passenger and fatality count. Could this revert be reverted? 223.229.228.97 (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It says so. Proceed.--Jetstreamer Talk 19:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You as said Expert of Airlines ... should have known ... but seems not ... do the blödsinn by yourself[edit]

Source and this time extreme precise in all 3 companies and leave me in peace ... Use a little bit the time you spend with you men and do it https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/aeroflot-cancels-international-flights/ --90.186.249.178 (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nota bene* This is why I probably would have simply responded to 90.186.249.178 on the talk page, rather than just removing their posting. It was a good faith question and this is a reasonable follow up from them. Pabsoluterince (talk) 00:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]