Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
WP:AIV
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
CSD / PRODs
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP
Bot-reported
- Kingrox official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- - Allusernameweretaken (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Aves will ruin your autobiography (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: blog. Violating string: aves wlll ruln your autoblography" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Note on file suggests affiliation with a website -- DQB (owner / report) 19:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Miugbdsxfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Sukike (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "kike" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Smelly786frog (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)- This username matched "smell(y|s)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 12:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "smelly" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 12:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Vineeth.babu.nz (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
User-reported
Current requests for increase in protection level
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
|
Talk:India national cricket team
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – If you're not aware, there's the 2021 Cricket World Cup running in the background. That's about to end, but given the large number of recent mostly unhelpful talk page comments, short-term protection would be useful. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. —ScottyWong— 23:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Radiation
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. InvalidOStalk 12:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:37, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. —ScottyWong— 23:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Barbados
Reason: IP Vandalism keeps occurring daily Gemini.skywalker (talk) 16:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 23:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Taga za Yug
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 23:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to Ron Flowers
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – recent death, IPs changing date of death against what sources say. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 23:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Eyad Abu Abaid
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing.. right after previous one expired FMSky (talk) 17:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. —ScottyWong— 23:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Pogrom
Reason: Requesting semi protection. Constant puppet IP vandalism. IP is edit warring removing content. This range of IP 170s constantly pops up.OyMosby (talk) 17:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- vandalism is removing giant text with sources and about the holocaust, like you did. I was just honest, i did not vandalize. If 400 Serbs killed in masses in a Nazi campaign of genocide against Serbs by ustashe in glina "is not porgrom" for you biased pov, much less Krnjeuša massacre is.
- What you added was not sourced. What you removed, the Pogrom of Krnjeuša is literally defined a Pogrom. Calling the article “biased” in your edit diff is literally pov bias. Now stop following me and harassing me. JohnGotten. OyMosby (talk) 17:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Stop denying, its clearly sourced. Massacre of Krnjeuša is not literally defined a Pogrom (name of article states that) and do not have a form of pogrom, glina pogrom clearly have. I did not have pov. I dont know who is "JohnGotten". I'm just disgusted by how the hrwiki neo-Nazis have quietly infiltrated the enwiki and how they make real chauvinistic anti-semite and anti-serb edits. I will dont stop following you because you is cleary stalking me.
- How am I clearly “stalking you” when you appear everywhere I go and post abusive hate comments? Deny the article stating Krnjeusa as a Pogrom all you want. You need to supply a source that states Glina was a pogrom. Stop accusing me of Holocaust denial when Glina was not involving Jewish victims. Clearly pov tactics. OyMosby (talk) 18:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Stop denying, its clearly sourced. Massacre of Krnjeuša is not literally defined a Pogrom (name of article states that) and do not have a form of pogrom, glina pogrom clearly have. I did not have pov. I dont know who is "JohnGotten". I'm just disgusted by how the hrwiki neo-Nazis have quietly infiltrated the enwiki and how they make real chauvinistic anti-semite and anti-serb edits. I will dont stop following you because you is cleary stalking me.
- What you added was not sourced. What you removed, the Pogrom of Krnjeuša is literally defined a Pogrom. Calling the article “biased” in your edit diff is literally pov bias. Now stop following me and harassing me. JohnGotten. OyMosby (talk) 17:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- vandalism is removing giant text with sources and about the holocaust, like you did. I was just honest, i did not vandalize. If 400 Serbs killed in masses in a Nazi campaign of genocide against Serbs by ustashe in glina "is not porgrom" for you biased pov, much less Krnjeuša massacre is.
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 23:27, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Testicles as food
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been too much vandalism by unregistered users due to this article's content. Hextor26 (talk) 18:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I see seven reverts since July. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Konstantin Nikolaev
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Corkyn1971. References are being removed with no explanation. InvalidOStalk 18:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —ScottyWong— 23:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Anti-Quebec sentiment
Reason: Recurrent vandalism, usually from IPs but also from registered users. Due to the nature of the topic, it should likely be protected indefinitely. Akesgeroth (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —ScottyWong— 23:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Milan
Reason: Edit warring. User deletes information (citation-verified) and replaces it with (false information) texts without any citation, even though are asked to stop doing so numerous times. Jerkusla (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Google Doodle
Reason: IP address keeps adding International Men's day as a Google Doodle, even though Google has declared that they will not do it. Also jumps IP's Pyramids09 (talk) 22:43, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Partial rangeblock: 2A0C:5A80:3908:BB00:0:0:0:0/64. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Warri
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Warri is a city of three tribes there are dispute in warri one of the ethnic group are constantly changing and adding on sourced information. LordSnow242 (talk) 23:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
|
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC) |
| 7 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| There are no outstanding requests for account creator. |
|---|
Account creator |
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
AutopatrolledUser:TrangaBellam
Plan on creating many articles concerning Turkmenistan (and Tajikistan). TrangaBellam (talk) 18:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
User:MoviesandTelevisionFan
Has created 221 pages. Only 2.3% have been deleted. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC) User:Soheelmoon
|
Comment: A number of recently created articles, in my opinion do not clearly and cleanly establish meeting our notability guidelines and I think that your creations could continue to do with review. I would like a second opinion from another administrator though. | There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File moverUser:Gpkp
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewerUser:WIKIZILE
I would like to help out the administrators with the page reviewing (reduce that burden), and I have been creating articles for 3 years and I would also like to contribute more to Wikipedia. I will highly appreciate the granting of thepermission. WIKIZILE (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
User:2006nishan178713
Hi! I am an editor in the English Wikipedia. I have been editing Wikipedia since the last 2 years. I have also created some articles especially the requested ones for Wikiproject India. Within this time, I have gained quite some knowledge about Wikipedia Policies. I am a Recent Changes patroller and I frequently revert vandalism. It would be an honour for me to be a New Page reviewer. Reviewing new pages is quite necessary and I believe that I am capable of doing so! Thanks Partha Basak 09:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
User:Robertjamal12
I would like to be a New Page Reviewer so I can mark good pages as Reviewed (in keeping with Wikipedia's guidelines) and help reduce the new page review backlog. I want to patrol the New Pages feed productively by using WikiLove to help editors (especially new ones) not get discouraged, even if their pages don't meet Wikipedia's requirements yet Robertjamal12 (talk) 23:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC) User:Lightburst
|
Not done user is blocked for copyvio. | Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page moverUser:Selfstudier
User:Curbon7
Hey requesting this permission mainly for the |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
|
Pending changes reviewerUser:Ctrlwiki
User:Robertjamal12
User:Vpab15
I'd like to help review articles with the pending changes protection. Vpab15 (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC) User:ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ
Hello, I would like to get pending changes reviewer rights, I'm humble with the Wiki-laws. Thank You! ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 09:25, 2 November 2021 (UTC) User:Trainsandotherthings
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
RollbackUser:Vpab15
This role will help me rollback multiple harmful editions to articles in my watchlist. Vpab15 (talk) 10:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor |
Template documentationUsage
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |