It would be good if Gitea offered support for the new citation file format, cf. https://citation-file-format.github.io/ and https://blog.front-matter.io/mfenner/step-forward-for-software-citation

This is intended to allow scientists to cite software repositories. I can imagine an implementation similar to Github: Similar to the buttons for forks and downloads of repositories, there may be a new

Please ensure:

• The bug is caused by Refined GitHub. It doesn't happen if I disable the extension.

Description

Particularly noticeable in dark mode since our defaults are quite bright sometimes.

For example the author border and conflict marker should not be so bright here:

<img width="366" alt="Screen Shot 8" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1402241/135727044-1

Our GitHub Workflow Status badges use an upstream GitHub API endpoint that requires we utilize the Workflow name. GitHub provides native badges for Workflow status which requires users specify the file name that contains the workflow definition.

For one reason or another, many o

问题类型

Feature Request

PicGo的相关信息

Windows 10 1909 18363.535
picgo 2.2.0

问题重现

功能请求

能否在上传区各个图床标题上以及图床设置中各个图床标题上，添加上图床管理页面的链接，单击后可直接打开浏览器跳转到图床管理页面？
如下图所示

When internationalization is enabled, we can have an option to clone all the data from any other locales.
Similar to what strapi provides (screenshots attached).

Steps could be something like:

• Click on 'Fill in from another locale' button
• ask to select a language from

Describe the feature or problem you’d like to solve

Microsoft released Windows Terminal Preview yesterday. It would be nice if GitHub Desktop was able to detect it.

Proposed solution

Adds an option to the shells available to use.

Additional context

N/A

My menubar is full. Even with "menubar mode" turned off it still appears up there. It should not force an icon up there.

Currently, few icons are not visible in dark theme. Make them visible by using theme neutral icons. May be we can make use of https://shields.io/ to generate our own kind of badges. For eg: Javascript.

Describe the proposed change(s).

Today we use re2 for any user-provided regex, with the aim being we can't be the victim - intentionally or accidentally - of catastrophic backtracking.

But how do we make sure that we don't accidentally add a problematic regex in our own code? Wouldn't we essentially close off the risk if we used re2 for any complex regex instead of using regex literals

JS 配置如下：

 var gitalk = new Gitalk({
            clientID: '3654916*****0c0038c28',
            clientSecret: 'd90d031a*****0e0fa4c7fe2fae747b96b',
            repo: 'Strange-AI.github.io',
            owner: 'Strange-AI',
            admin: ['jinfagang', 'Strange-AI'],
            id: vm.codeId,
            distractionFreeMode: false
        });
        gitalk.render('gitalk-conta