Talk:Scared Straight!

WikiProject Film / American / Documentary

(Rated C-class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

C

This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-Class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = <yes/no> \| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3 <!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = <yes/no> \| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Recidivism rates[edit]

The statement of 'The recidivism rate of the original two casts was less than 10%.' needs citation, Considering evidence to the contrary later in the article. Otherwise it should be left out.

98.210.88.228 (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Original research[edit]

130.156.29.112 keeps trying to insert the following text:

Of course, it must be remembered that the program was the brainchild of a film maker, not a psychiatrist specializing in the rehabilitation of felons; therefore, the focus was on whatever theatrical value could be obtained by filming a group of hulking inmates scaring relatively young teenagers.

Phrases like "it must be remembered" are frequently a warning sign of original research. I do not think this paragraph is any exception. For all we know, Arnold Shapiro got the idea for Scared Straight! when a psychiatrist specializing in the rehabilitation of felons said to him "You know, if some of the young people who are in small-time trouble now could see just how brutal life in prison really is, it might scare them straight." Am I saying such a thing happened? No, but that's just the point: We do not have any reliable sources telling us whose "brainchild" the program was. We do not have any reliable sources telling us whether Shapiro consulted with professionals of the kind 130.156.29.112 tries to assert had no input into the production. We do not have any reliable sources telling us that Shapiro's "focus" was theatrical value and no other kind. In short, we have no reliable sources supporting 130.156.29.112's version of events, and we can hardly tell readers that they "must" remember what 130.156.29.112 is only guessing to be the case. -- 209.6.177.176 (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

130.156.31.148/130.156.31.112/130.156.31.182, you keep accusing others of bad faith but the fact is that they have given reasons why the passage should not be there; you by contrast have ignored the talk page completely. -- 209.6.177.176 (talk) 00:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Anon (same one?) seems to continue to insist on placing the offending phrase, or some version thereof, in the article. Still no justification provided for it. Some justification is needed, given that it is totally unsourced and blatantly violates WP:EDITORIAL. If you have some source which verifies that the program was conducted without input from anyone with expertise in rehabilitation, and verifies what Shapiro said he was going for with regard to theatrical value vs. a genuine belief that the tactic might actually work, then just cite that source. If you don't have any such source, then that's just your interpretation and opinion and, even though I find your opinion plausible, it still doesn't belong here. Mwelch (talk) 03:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Angelo Speziale?[edit]

Is this the same Angelo Speziale that appeared in the film? If so, it would probably be worth mentioning. [1] 4.242.138.246 (talk) 19:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kids Of North Jersey[edit]

I was reading up on this and I was wondering if there's anyone who can help me. I was in a Scared Straight program in New Jersey that was named Kids Of North Jersey where there was emotional, physical and mental abuse. I was in there for 4 yrs and I also have a website that is souly dedicated to the New Jersey Branch. Is there anyway where we can do a Wiki page on this specific program? I have loads of people whom I spent time with in there that may be willing to put in some actual events and information about it.

For further info, please visit both of these sites:

http://www.kidsofbergencounty.com/

and a YT video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DyK3XlsWIEQ

Here's a video on the "Over The G.W." movie:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLy7z-2tbAA —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.100.22.81 (talk) 03:16, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Melinda?[edit]

Who the hell is this Melinda, and Easy E? WTF

Who wrote this crap? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.46.70 (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Everyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.133.207 (talk) 14:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Further information needed for balance[edit]

While the citations are worthy, the article gives the impression that the "Scared Straight" programs are labeled a failure due to one member of the program later being convicted. Further failures would be better noted, as the current article mentions the initial program having a singular failure, no further aftermath of the others in the program and other states emulation of the program may have been different, yielding different results. A suggestion would be for one well acquainted with the meta-analysis to provide the statistics and further background in the various programs enacted by the states.Wzrd1 (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Who is Qaadir?[edit]

Following on from 'who is Melinda' above, the article says None of the "graduates" of the original documentary have since been convicted of a felony except for Angelo Speziale, who in 2010 was convicted and sentenced to 25 years in prison for the rape and murder of his neighbor in 1982 (after the film was made).[2] Qaadir was the only one to become a professional criminal and spend his entire adult life in prison.

There's no other mention of a "Qaadir" in the article. Incidentally, if he has really "spent his entire adult life in prison", it seems unlikely that he hasn't been convincted of a felony. Henry ^Flower 10:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Confused focus[edit]

The article seems to be talking about three separate things at once. 1. The original documentary. 2. The follow up specials aired decades later. 3. The scared straight programs that were inspired by these shows. If Wikipedia had been around in the 90's it's likely the revival series would have their own wikipedia pages. The opening of the article and the infobox imply it's just about the documentary but then the article covers all of them. That format implies it should be a generatl article and the documentary should be covered in the history section. Harizotoh9 (talk) 00:58, 24 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Beyond Scared Straight[edit]

Is it possible for an article for Beyond Scared Straight series be created? Cwater1 (talk) 00:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]