Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment
WikiProject Biography |
---|
General information |
Announcements |
Departments |
Work groups and subprojects |
Things you can do |
Suzanne Carrell • Mullá Husayn • John Gilchrist (linguist) • Thomas Brattle •
|
Biography article statistics |
Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Biography. This department focuses on assessing the quality and priority of Wikipedia's biography articles. A quality rating estimates how close an article comes to a professional standard. The priority or importance rating estimates the relative importance of a subject when compared to other biographical articles.; this rating can help project members to prioritise editing work. These quality and priority rating systems were established by the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team, and are customised by WikiProject organisers.
An article's rating is set in the class
parameter of the {{WikiProject Biography}} project banner on the article's talk page. Setting the class
value causes the article to be listed in the corresponding sub-categories under Category:Biography articles by quality, and to lists generated by bots such as.
Frequently asked questions[edit]
- How can I request an article assessment?
- Add it to the assessment request queue below. If you'd like someone to write some constructive feedback about the article, you can request a peer review from editors outside WikiProject Biography. At present, WikiProject Biography's peer review is backlogged.
- Who can rate an article?
- Anyone can rate a biographical article, but if you revised an article enough to change its potential rating, or if you have a conflict of interest, someone else should review it. A rating higher than B-class requires a more formal review process.
- What if I disagree with a rating?
- Ask the reviewer what they think the article needs (preferably on the article's talk page). You can also (re)list the article in the assessment request queue, or directly ask a WikiProject Biography member to review it.
- Are the ratings subjective?
- Reviewers are expected to follow Wikipedia's article quality grading criteria.
- How can I begin assessing articles?
- See "How to assess an article" below.
How to assess an article[edit]
Read the criteria in the quality scale, and determine which grade best reflects the state of the article. If the quality grade you chose differs from the one on the article's talk page, set the grade by changing the class
parameter for each WikiProject banner, like this:
{{WikiProject Biography |class=Start}}
If the article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography but does not have a {{WikiProject Biography}} banner on its talk page, add the banner.
You can find articles to rate in Category:Unassessed biography articles. This is a list of talk pages that have a banner with an incomplete assessment.
There's more to article assessment than just quality and priority grades. See {{WikiProject Biography}} for complete instructions.
Class parameter[edit]
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Biography}} project banner on its talk page:
- {{WikiProject Biography|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class biography articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class biography articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class biography articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class biography articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class biography articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class biography articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class biography articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class biography articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class biography articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class biography articles) | Category | |
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class biography articles) | Disambig | |
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class biography articles) | Draft | |
File (for files and timed text; adds pages to Category:File-Class biography articles) | File | |
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class biography articles) | Project | |
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class biography articles) | Redirect | |
Template (for templates and modules; adds pages to Category:Template-Class biography articles) | Template | |
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class biography articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed biography articles) | ??? |
The quality rating should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
It is not necessary to add a class
parameter to talk pages that do not correspond to ordinary articles. For categories, disambiguation pages, redirects, etc., the class is implicit.
Priority parameters[edit]
{{WikiProject Biography}} has separate priority parameters for specialised sub-projects and work groups.
{{WikiProject Biography}}
-tagged talk pages that have an active general |priority=
or |importance=
parameter should be changed to one or more of |a&e-priority=
, |filmbio-priority=
, |musician-priority=
, |military-priority=
, |peerage-priority=
, |politician-priority=
, |royalty-priority=
, |s&a-priority=
or |sports-priority=
, depending on which work groups the article is tagged for. Please refer to Template:WikiProject Biography/doc for further guidance.
WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers has its own priority scale; please use it. For all other work groups and WikiProjects listed here, use WikiProject Biography's priority scale.
The valid values for all priority parameters are: Top, High, Mid, and Low.
Articles for each work group and sub-project where the priority has not yet been assessed are found in Category:Unknown-importance biography articles. Do not use priority parameters for non-articles (i.e. redirects, disambiguation pages, categories, etc.).
Quality scale[edit]
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Mary Shelley (as of March 2019) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | Timeline of Jane Austen (as of March 2008) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Milla Jovovich (as of June 2008) |
GA | The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Theodore Kaczynski (as of March 2019) |
B | The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Roy Lichtenstein (as of March 2019) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Mark Gerban (as of March 2019) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Samuel Beardsley (as of March 2019) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues. More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Urraca of Castile, Queen of Portugal (as of March 2019) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of mycologists (as of March 2019) |
Priority scale[edit]
Priority must be regarded as a relative term. If priority values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the biography falls under. An article judged to be "Top-importance" in one context may be only "Mid-importance" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).
Label | Criteria | Examples |
---|---|---|
Top | High probability that non-Historians would look this up. Limited to the top 200 biographies. Must have had a large impact outside of their main discipline, across several generations, and in the majority of the world. For instance, Einstein, brilliant physicist, but his theories have affected people outside of physics and in many other countries besides his nation of origin and several generations. His ideas have changed the way people think. No member should give this rating to any biography without first getting Project approval from the other members. | Albert Einstein |
High | Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. | Patrick Henry |
Mid | Important in their discipline. | John Seigenthaler, Sr. |
Low | Subject is notable in their main discipline. | Morena Baccarin |
Requesting an assessment[edit]
Any user may perform an article assessment. No special permissions or tools are needed, although User:Evad37/rater is a recommended tool. However, if you prefer help from a WikiProject Biography volunteer to rate an article, please feel free to list it below.
This is a quality rating only. Reviewers usually do not comment on the article. For more detailed feedback, you can request a peer review.
Articles submitted to the list below can be rated up to B-class. For higher assessments, see Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions and Wikipedia:Featured article criteria.
Reviewers: For general assessment instructions, see "How to assess an article" above. After you assess an article, please delete it from the list.
If you checked for B-class readiness, please add a short section titled "B-class review" to the article's talk page. If you do not believe the article meets the criteria for B-class, explain what improvements it needs in order to pass. If it passes, confirm in writing that you checked the article for all B-class criteria, and that it passed.
Requests[edit]
Edit this section and add request to the end of the list. Use format of * [[ article name]] brief description. ~~~~
- Draft:Henry Schuck - looking to submit this article about the founder of newly-public company ZoomInfo. Declined on first attempt at approval.
- Draft:Corey Worthington This is a new biographical article where the 2008 version was deleted due to the subject being underage at the time. I have updated with new sources from the past 12 years. I invite someone to please assess it, thanks. gazzamcnally (talk) 07:43, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Victor P. Tsilonis - This page has been wrongly labelled as promotional, although it has undergone a lot of editing and is constantly being reviewed by a few yet experienced Wikipedia users. I would love to have some feedback on this issue. Thank you in advance. Agnostosnous (talk) 16:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Presidency of Ram Nath Kovind - This article has been expanded, unnecessary images are removed, Sources are fixed, and the data is summarized. Any Copyright Violation is Unlikely (according to this -[1]) Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Abdurrahman Gazi - new article about an early Ottoman warrior affiliated with Ertuğrul, Osman I and Orhan. IronManCap (talk) 13:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Adam Naruszewicz - I expanded this recently, I think it may be a bit short of GA. Comments appreciated. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:59, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Jurina Matsui - This article was assessed as Start in 2013. I overhauled and basically rewrote everything and fixed all citations so it meets Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Yolo4A4Lo (talk) 14:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- People For Animals - This stub has been expanded into a larger sized article.
- Pavel Rovinsky – I have significantly expanded this article. Aleksamil (talk) 12:29, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- Veena Sahajwalla- looking for an assessment. I have recently been working on this article and would like to get it reassessed. I have added 5 new sections which cover a broader range of information. mui3772 (talk) 5:40, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
- Sean Baker (filmmaker) - this "stub" has been expanded significantly since its last assessment. This director's films have received Oscar nominations (one for Willem Dafoe who is of a different generation than the director) and he has received several other high awards, one presented by John Waters who is also of a different generation. His films are regularly accepted at Cannes and lots of other international film festivals, including at the Mumbai International Film Festival where he was president of the jury. Kire1975 (talk) 07:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Mark Emmert - the NCAA section in particular has only one citation for eight paragraphs of text, has had text added that casts doubt on that citation (which is critical of the subject), makes many unsubstantiated and wishy-washy claims, and makes some claims that need citations. It's currently rated B but I think that's a stretch, it reads as hagiography.
Étienne Perier (governor) — This article was subjected to extreme edit warring and sock puppetry that expanded it from a Start class to a royal mess. It has been completely rewritten and extensively sourced through a collaborative (albeit sometimes still contentious) process and is now stable. I did move it up to C class, but feel it should be at least B or higher, perhaps even a potential GA or FA candidate. A review and reassessment would be appreciated. —Carter (talk) 15:30, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
- This has been nominated for GA review. —Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 17:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Ming T. Tsuang, Amy Barger and José María Vélaz — Please reassess. I expanded these former stub articles significantly. Thanks, Heartmusic678 (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- BDC (group) - Can you reassess this article? I believe this article has enough information to grow out of the stub status. Thanks! Byy2 (talk) 08:00, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
- Alden Whitman — Stub now vastly expanded, broadly sourced, and linked into the biographic tissue of Wikipedia by dint of Whitman's profession: obituarist. Unendin (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Statistics[edit]
Current status[edit]
Biography articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Core | Other | Total | |||||
FA | 32 | 1,456 | 1,488 | ||||
FL | 176 | 176 | |||||
A | 1 | 98 | 99 | ||||
GA | 43 | 6,864 | 6,907 | ||||
B | 72 | 27,937 | 28,009 | ||||
C | 52 | 108,526 | 108,578 | ||||
Start | 1 | 614,419 | 614,420 | ||||
Stub | 1,020,184 | 1,020,184 | |||||
List | 6,100 | 6,100 | |||||
Category | 74,195 | 74,195 | |||||
Disambig | 7,725 | 7,725 | |||||
File | 19,680 | 19,680 | |||||
Project | 1 | 99 | 100 | ||||
Redirect | 2 | 17,382 | 17,384 | ||||
Template | 2,569 | 2,569 | |||||
NA | 33 | 33 | |||||
Assessed | 204 | 1,907,443 | 1,907,647 | ||||
Unassessed | 78,161 | 78,161 | |||||
Total | 204 | 1,985,604 | 1,985,808 | ||||
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 9,727,070 | Ω = 5.46 |
Assessment log[edit]
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.
Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Biography articles by quality log
Worklist[edit]
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Cleanup listings[edit]
Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Weekly biography listings here. Please be patient while lists load as there are over 1.6 million articles. Run on Tuesdays, generated by CleanupWorklistBot.
Biography assessment backlog - Call for Volunteers[edit]
To help reduce the long-standing backlog of biography articles waiting for assessment, consider adopting your "favorite" alphabet letter and working there. You can click on a letter to be linked directly to it and see how long it is. In the table below, just replace the ★ with your Username. There can be more than one person per letter. Teamwork really helps! We recommend putting a link on your user page or in another easy-to-find location so that you can more easily work on your letter.
Call for Volunteers
WikiProject Biography needs your help!
More than one person can work on the same alphabet letter, so Be bold. |
Rater assessment tool
Fun helping article assessments
|
Alphabet | Volunteer |
---|---|
A | User:Darwin Naz |
B | ★ |
C | ★ |
D | User:Puddleglum2.0 |
E | User:Wizardman |
F | User:AmericanAir88 |
G | ★ |
H | User:Tcr25 |
I | User:Tcr25 |
J | User:Firstclass306 |
K | User:Lepricavark |
L | ★ |
M | ★ |
Alphabet | Volunteer |
---|---|
N | ★ |
O | ★ |
P | User:GreatSculptorIthas |
Q | User:Tcr25 |
R | ★ |
S | User:Sahaib3005 |
T | User:Yerkes-Dodson, User:Majavah |
U | User:Tcr25 |
V | User:Nannochloropsis |
W | User:Nerd1a4i |
X | User:Sbbarker19 |
Y | User:Sbbarker19 |
Z | User:Sbbarker19 |