User talk:Dreamy Jazz
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
1.37.0-wmf.18 (d377d4f)
 | Dreamy Jazz is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dreamy_Jazz. |
| This is Dreamy Jazz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
 | This talk page is automatically archived by ClueBot III. Threads with no replies in 15 days may be automatically moved. |
Thank you![edit]
Thank you for helping me understand the relevant policy for my recent edits on #wikipedia-en-help 😸 -Arzg (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
- Arzg, good to hear. Happy editing, Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 19:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
DS double tagging[edit]
Irish RepublicanMedia (talk · contribs) was soft blocked and requested a rename to BalearicSunrise (talk · contribs) but then went ahead and registered the new username and started using it. IRM had a DS notice for the troubles. BS is editing in the same area so I gave them a DS notice too. It seems a grey area between double tagging the same person (probably) and ensuring that the second account was aware. Not sure how it falls from an Arbcom rules perspective. Thanks, Cabayi (talk) 06:25, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) Cabayi, I don't see anything too wrong with that, though this is definitely IAR territory. I'd say that the second notice makes it clear for anyone who doesn't check the past account that they have in fact been notified. GeneralNotability (talk) 13:55, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Although GN has given a good answer, my response to this would be alerts apply per editor (and thus per person) and not per account. As such they are formally aware. However, the DS alert filter log which is used to check if a editor is formally aware doesn't show this previous alert under their new username. Although the accounts may be clearly linked, a passing editor may miss the previous alert which isn't desirable.
- Therefore, I think that IAR applies here. For example, if DS is likely to be used to warn/sanction the editor placing the alert again for the entry to show up in the log will likely prevent confusion or misunderstanding. However this may not be needed for a constructive editor who had the alert simply because they edit in the topic area. Regardless, an editor in good faith placing an alert on a new account before the 12 months is up cannot be seen as disruptive in my eyes. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 17:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)