Meet My Mangled Motif

October 12, 2010

sculpture

Beautiful, isn’t it not?

What you see is one of my earliest attempts at art. An atrocity of copper and white space, this little abomination was originally an experiment with magnetic forces and solenoids. But, times change. Now, this small and dangerously pointy sculpture stands as a symbol of humanity, and the futility that fuels our existence. What you see here is the result of accidental processes, being formed by means of unwinding a particularly poor coil of wire and attempting to extract it from the remains of a particularly resilient second wire, which was considered the better wound of the two potential choices. Truly magical.

Now, as for what it’s supposed to be:

I have no idea. As mentioned in an earlier entry, I am not an artist, and this piece was just a fluke that I happened to notice before I gave up in frustration and melted both wires into a pretty copper slag. Thankfully, I have a knack for seeing meaning where no such thing is due, and I immediately noticed the potential that this ‘artwork’ could demonstrate.

If there’s anything I’ve learned from examining people and their psychology over the years, it’s that there is meaning in everything, and everything created by a human, both directly and indirectly, must have some meaning. The same goes for this orange oversight. In my interpretation, the sculpture reminds me of the essence of human nature to forever attempt to advance, to proceed further in their evolution of sciences and technologies. The sculpture also represents the futility of such a need.

Firstly, let us examine the shape. A simple wire, held on a wire, to make two wires. the first wire is the stand, and was special in that the weight balance upon it’s accidental creation was perfect for the purpose it now serves. the wire attached, however, is not so perfect. Actually, it is. The wire is being held on to the other wire by nothing more than sheer force of will and determination. It sits strong against the first wire, unmoving and resistant to most basic outside forces. This has some meaning, I’m sure of it.

The first wire represents time, and the further up one goes, the further up one goes. Time continues, and is both linear and finite in this case. Philosophers and physicists, I shun thee. the second wire represents humanity, and it’s progress. Note that the wire is both ugly and non-linear. Next consider the random formation of shapes and overall design that it has taken to reach the point of perfect balance. Finally, continue to read as if you know something that others don’t around you, wielding your skilful mastery of the English language with smug, pompous portentousness. This random formation is an indication of several key ideas: first and foremost is the idea that human development has only truly started at a later time in the timeline, suggesting inexperience on our part. This leads to the idea that humanity has enforced it’s goals on the natural, linear progress of things and therefore had a negative effect on the overall basis of nature.

The second wire’s shape also shows a definite beginning and end, showing a level of linear design and resultants. This is to symbolise that the struggle for perfection, the final hope of reaching the goal that humans forever strive for, will end just as fast as it has begun, and will be nothing more than a blemish on the great and powerful left cheek of time. that the second wire ends after going backwards suggests that the decline and eventual downfall of humanity’s exploits will be the result of their own ambition, and can therefore be seen as the subconscious factor of self-destruction that all humans are capable of. Take that, Pacifism As A Whole.

Note the colouring: a simple, continuous coppery sheen. Simply simplistic, if a tad overrated. But wait, is that a defining characteristic I peruse? Oh, my, what are the odds? The colouring is not constant, though the material remains the same throughout. The truth of the matter is that the wire wrapping around the main length appears to be a few shades darker, giving a strangely sinister and diseased feel to it. This darkness  adds to the dark intentions of the original themes of human development, and can be used to express both the dark methods in which perversions of humanity are performed under the righteous cloak of progress.

This is the nature of this sculpture: to tell the dark tale of humanity, from beginning all the way into the foreseeable future. Isn’t that just dandy?

Still, I like it. Even if it is an abortion of artistic creativity. I should do this more often. But, I must give credit where credit is due, and so I thank Embed Design for the photographic work, located at the following location:

http://www.embed-design.com/

Now, I must leave, but I leave a small challenge to keep you cold at night:

If anyone can interpret this sculpture better, I would love to love to care about it. Take your best shot, and may the scrutiny commence.

Yours Daringly,

Crane.

 

My, That Was Relaxing

October 11, 2010

And so I return.

Having been severely scarred by my last documented vacation, I decided that a little bit of actual relaxation was in order. I have now returned, and am pleased to announce that my intellectual blocker has been disabled. I can write again.

Thus, I am here, and, starting from Tuesday, I will be commenting here, in the confines of this blog, on society and anything about it that I think I should comment on. I’m a changed man, and I intend to show it. And tomorrow will be quite interesting.

An associate of mine did some photographic work for me on a sculpture I accidentally wrenched into existence. Liking my little abomination of creativity, I wished it to be captured at it’s most humble yet exorbitant moment. Though the photographer may have failed in that respect, due to some miscalculation of some unexpected variable or some such, the results are still of some interest to me, and so I will present them.

Keep in mind, I am no artist: I can criticise and analyse, scrutinise and finalise, but I am a man of the mind, not the mediocre. Though I must say, the way the sculpture manages to work with the photographer is nothing short of flamboyant humility.

Yours Nightmarishly,

Crane.

You would have to have found it to have lost it.

But, unfortunately, I have no such discovery under my belt. Instead, I am forced to live in a hellish civilization that does not suit me in the least. In fact, if one were to look at my life, and everything that I stand for and believe in, they would understand that this place is in fact the exact polar opposite of the ideal location for me. I am in proverbial, and in some cases literal, hell.

And only 28 days to go.

Actually, as I write this, I feel it prudent to point out that this is one of the few points in this trip that I am freed of the basics that compose my hell quite accurately. Computers are a rare and dangerous commodity in this country, like plutonium and fish. In fact, this situation is so rare that I intend to completely ignore Helga on this post and give the readers an unedited copy of my work, both out of the freedom and giddy enjoyment of the moment, and also the timer that ticks beside me as a reminder of the life I am now forced to live.

So, let’s make this quick.

As I arrived from my 36 hour trip in this country, the most prominent thing that hit me, besides the loose chair from the passenger in front of me, was the large amount of people of my age group on the same plane as myself. The entire plane was, as I gazed about me, filled with Italian tourists, students who had come here with the purpose of both learning better English and ‘hooking up’, to coin a phrase.

This is proving to be the only thing keeping me withing the bleary confines of sanity. I’ve never had the chance to analyse an individual with a poor grasp of English, let alone a good grasp of something else. This will surely prove to be a wonderful experience for me. Unfortunately, I have a little difficulty with the interactive requirements of a conversational social environ. In other words, I have no idea how to talk to someone, be they of a fluent or fractured English variant.

This is where you people come in. I ask for something, something important, something that would never have happened under any other circumstance other than being trapped in an isolated hell: I need help socialising, be it on a basic conversational level with a group of my peers or perhaps to strike up a chat with a friendly female for the purpose of study during more intimate moments.

I truly hope that you readers out there can help, what with Helga asleep in another timezone and all. I hope to return to the comforts of technology within the next few days, so I hope you can provide the necessary (organised) data within that time.

Yours Needily,

Crane.

Busy Busy…

June 23, 2010

Packing for a trip just isn’t my thing.

I was gong through some of my belongings the other day, preparing for my trip in 2 weeks, when I chanced upon an interesting little cache of junk. While I was looking through my lower drawer, I discovered a box, which had a rusty padlock on it.

The rust around the padlock was clearly in an advanced state, as the lock, a flimsy 2 dollar one, as the thing snapped away with little effort from myself. It was around this point that I looked at the box in it’s entirety.

The box was like a biscuit tin, only on hinges, and was made of a metal similar to the padlock. the parts where paint had worn away there were large splotches of rust, though they showed no signs of breaking. The box also had an interesting design feature, possibly added post production, in the form of a piece of paper taped onto the lid with the words “DO NOT TOUCH” written in dark permanent marker.

As I began to pry open the rusty lid, I began to wonder behind my intentions for sealing a tin such as this. Perhaps there was a point to storing it away in the most seldom used drawer in the house. But then the lid became unstuck, and my thoughts were shifted.

I have to say, I was a little surprised at this one.

Firstly, it is interesting to note the smell: death and decay, old socks, and perhaps a hint of my last attempt at Indian cuisine emanated from the inside, momentarily forcing me to choke on my breath. A rag over my face quickly cleared things up, and so I had the chance to look inside.

All that was in the container was a shirt, a small one from at least a decade previously. The shirt was uninteresting in itself, though an ominous stain on the front seemed to draw me closer to the box. However, a brief inspection of the stain told me little, and so I was forced to take drastic measures.

Grabbing a pair of barbecue tongs, I began prodding the shirt. Nothing at first came up, but a small lump under the chest area told me that something was in there. And, since I had little else to do that day, I had to know what.

I picked up the shirt from the stain, and the lump came with it. The whole thing came to rest on a bench in the room, under a halo of light usually used to blind small animals in my spare time. But this was just as good, if not more unusual.

I began to feel around the shirt with the tongs again, and found a way into the shirt. With none of the regret I feel now, I removed the lump from the center. And then I dropped the tongs, remembering exactly why I had hidden the box all those years ago.

I had pulled out the rotted carcass of a rat, which had not complete decayed, trapped in the dry tin as it was. Nothing of the head remained, though small chunks of dry flesh still clung to the chest cavity. The smell was overpowering, and so I made sure to drop the body into my bin, with little success.

As it turns out, years ago I had been doing the same thing as I was now: hunting through my clothes in preparation for a trip. I remember that I had found that shirt, and decided to try it on. Disliking it, I had taken it off only to discover a rat scampering across the floor. I remember that I threw down the shirt, catching the rat under it, and then grabbing the bundle and trapping the rat inside. From there, I found one of my old collecting tins and shoved the bundle inside, taking care to avoid looking at it. I had a horrid fear of rats for a while as a child, thinking them too cunning to be a rodent and too numerous to not have already taken over.

My deed done, I placed a note on the tin, shifting slightly from the struggles of the rat within, in hopes that I would never discover the thing again. I told my parents that I had thrown the shirt out due to sentimental reasons, and life resumed as normal.

And so there I was again, staring down at a creature that had disturbed me years before. Even know, I feel that rats, much like cuttlefish and seagulls, are too many and powerful to not fear, and so I had no choice but to, as usual, hide the body. Pretty standard, I know, but I still don’t enjoy the unhygienic feel of carting around a breeding ground for all sorts of disturbing and potentially fatal beings.

Once the body was gone, dumped in an outside bin after several failed attempts to use a home-made catapult to fire the corpse out the door, I returned inside and disposed of the tin also. At last, I was free of that menacing burden, so horrific that I almost forgot about it for a time.

And so, I continue to pack, constantly on the prowl for any new dangers that may loom in the shadows. I hope that the rat served as an example to the other less than ideal members of the house, that I have no issue with removing any ‘undesirable’ elements. Creatures of the world, you have been warned, or so I assume, at least by following the idea that all animals can understand each other, much like in animal movies such as Open Season. We can only hope.

Yours Heartlessly,

Crane.

Crane Under Maintenance

June 11, 2010

I need a break.

I understand that my posts have become less frequent. I’m sure many would find this a tragedy compared only with the passing of Elvis Presley, though I am here to tell you otherwise. For, as I will explain in greater detail in a moment, things are a little difficult at the moment.

It’s that time of the year, when my staff goes on vacation for a few weeks, leaving me to look after my own affairs. Even Helga has left, off to some family reunion or another, and will be back in three weeks or so. Because of this, I have a problem.

Normally, I have others to do my duties for me, leaving me plenty of time to work on my posts and projects. Lacking my staff, the office has come to a screeching halt, and I have been left to clean up the mess. As such, my time is limited, and therefore so are my posts.

As soon as the staff get back, I will resume life as normal. Until then, I fear that my posts will be less than sufficient in quantity or quality, as I lack a group of people to inspire new projects for me.

That is why I am posting an open area of suggestion: I need something to work on, a project to entertain me that I can write about, and so I ask you, the readers, to send any and all suggestions that you can on things that I could read up on, learn about, and improve upon. If I like your idea, I will post the resulting tide of information. If I do not, then I suppose you just aren’t cut out for this kind of thing, and therefore you should leave this place at once.

Yours Openly (to a degree),

Crane.

Relationships weren’t meant to last.

Recently, it has come to my attention that popular culture has decided to go in a ‘relationship’ direction, giving television viewers saucy love lives and newspaper addicts some juicy marital gossip on celebrity icons. In fact, Helga tells me that this has been going on for quite a while, and i must be some nomadic hermit not to notice. Forgive me for enjoying the more complex things in life besides updates on either fictional characters or the people who play fictional characters.

Untrue remarks aside, it has come to my attention also that people rather enjoy something as trivial as the relationships of those more fortunate than they, as if it were of some importance. Untrue remarks permitting, this is incredibly interesting to me.

The reason I bother to bring this up is not to point out how poorly it is that people choose to spend their waking lives, nor how ridiculous it is that prime-time dramas have their own magazine. I am here to discuss relationships, and how they were intended to work. Be advised, the following content may lead to thoughts of incredible irony and a thirst for human elbow grease.

You see, I have had the pleasure of never being in a serious relationship, be it marriage, girlfriend, boyfriend, friend-with-benefits, or any of the other synonymous statements relating to anything more than a friend. I have, however, had the chance to observe those around me in said relationships, be they deep and loving, or just plain fruitless. And so, without the distraction of human companionship on a deeper level, my mind has been clear enough to assess other relationships and come to a decent theory that would have a high standing in any field of research involving human behavior.

When an individual enters a relationship, they usually enter it because the other individual of the pair have some quality that the first individual [refers, be it their looks, their intelligence, their friendliness, or any of an assortment of qualities that make humans so ‘human’. Indeed, the occasional couple may find that they are perfect for each other, and fall madly and deeply in love. Usually, a relationship ensues, and regular systems of chronological process are followed blindly and inefficiently.

However, human psychology was not designed with relationships in mind. In fact, relationships of certain degrees can cause severe damaging to an individuals mental health, both short and long term. No, relationships are the bane of human existence, and the mind recognizes this, even if the body refuses to.

There is a theory that states that no two people are perfect for each other, for no two people are exactly the same. This is a truth that the mind is programmed with, and is seen quite clearly through the actions associated with a relationship.

To put bluntly, relationships, no matter how strong or devoting they are, can never exist indefinitely: people will eventually despise each other, and the relationship will fail. ‘True Love’ is a concept thought up by movie producers who thought that love was an excellent catalyst for money (strangely, this is true: how much do you spend on your loved one?). For those not in a solid relationship, read on if it suits you. For those with strong, wonderful relationships, you’re welcome too.

In relationships, there is a ‘link’ between two people. This link acts as their reason for being together, comprised of all the good qualities they see in each other, and naturally the better the relationship, the bigger and stronger the link. As time goes on, that link begins to suffer slightly, age beginning to fray it about the edges. When, at long last, a fragment of the link is separated and lost from the link, the mind quickly act to fill that link with something. Unfortunately for those in a relationship, the replacement is never quite as good as the original piece.

This ‘false’ piece of the link inspires further decay as the remaining original link attempts to compensate for lost effort: chunks of the link are destroyed, leaving nothing behind, having to be replaced by inferior qualities. As this process wears on, the individuals of the link begin to lose the relation elation that kept them together, and the new-found negativity brings about further weakening of the bond between the two.

And so, the process continues: as the powerful bonds that held people together are severed one by one, weaker bonds take their place. And even when all the original linking bonds are gone, the replacement bonds begin to suffer also, being replaced with either better or worse links. This explains why people have a ‘falling out’ stage, and have a brief reconciliation before leading to further decay.

Eventually, the link holding two individuals together is at breaking point, having been pulled to it’s last bonds. The individuals feel none of the old feelings they had for each other, instead feeling a deep loathing towards one another. This is the final stage of a relationship, and applies to any kind of relationship. Even deep friendships can be affected by this, though this is rare, and commonly requires a more powerful catalyst than time to weaken a link.

Naturally, there are certain relationships that last the test of time, examples being when a married couple die loving each other, though this is no different to the original theory: the link holding the individuals together was strong, but would have eventually worn away, given more time. The couple were just lucky enough to die before their love life did. Of course, there would have been some imperfect bonds in the relationship while alive, though lack of sufficient living entities would have led to minimal results, though the couple would have felt differently about each other from when they first met to when they died, and all probability states that they would have been all the worse for it. Oh well.

This theory has been widely criticized. So much so, in fact, that is is now a major accepted theory on behavioral psychology, is in the running for a Nobel Peace Prize (heavens knows why) and is being made into a major motion picture starring Robin Williams and Shia LeBeouf (I plan to remove the latter actor by any means necessary, or by whatever means I deem most inventive, as soon as my schedule frees up). So the theory is certainly sound.

If you happen to be in a relationship with someone at the present time, there is a short-term solution I can recommend: dump the current individual you are with, find a lesser quality individual, and spend a time of your choosing with that individual. Assuming the other individual hasn’t done the same thing, you are then free to leave and return to the original, better relationship and continue along the track without the wear of time destroying the original link. Unfortunate side effects may include a corrupted link, less satisfying relationships and greater effects on existing links in future by extended periods of time. This one’s a wild card laced with nitro glycerin, so only commit to it if you lack a creative spark of your own.

Yours Unaccountably,

Crane.

Vocals are way off.

I was having a chat with a friend of mine not long ago, when a person of an anonymous nature came up and began speaking with my chatting friend. When I attempted to engage in conversation with her, she put forward an idea based upon my voice, coming to a conclusion of my sexuality based on how I ‘sounded’.

Needless to say, she was completely wrong. And instead of being offended by it, I was silently thankful to her for putting forward an interesting bit of human psychology I hadn’t paid much attention to before:

When a person talks, they have a certain style in which they form their words, a format that suits them, and is therefore their own way of speaking. However, the placement of words is only part of the structure, as the way that the words sound is also an important key factor in the overall effect of a persons speech.

There are people  who utilize both structure and sound well. These are the average people, those with a steady balance of both elements. There are those with poor structure, but an effective sound, those commonly known as singers and performers, whose structure is set out prior to release of vocals.

Then, of course, there are those with a brilliant structure to their speech, a truly effective and informative style of speaking, but who lack the appropriate voice to express their opinions in words as well as they ought. These people, usually those of a higher intelligence but of lower social poise than those of an average level, are mostly uncommon in today’s society, and it pains me to have to admit to being one such individual.

Naturally, there are some mutations in people, where their speaking is exceptional in both voice and structure. An example of this is Adolf Hitler, who combined the power of his voice, the sway in his words, and the bullets in his guns to rule over Germany unopposed by the people for an extended period of time. There are also those that lack the structure and the voice to be a proper speaker, Whom are best described under the banner of ‘Nada’.

The interesting part is that other people who listen to these styles of speakers develop an image about people, based entirely on how well they can communicate. those who have an effective method of speaking are usually judged to be normal, while those of a lesser quality are viewed as ‘Nada’. Usually, one who has excelled in one of the fields of speaking, but not another, are usually unaware of their effectiveness. one could be particularly irritating in speech, but their structure is viewed so well in their minds that they can’t help but go on. This is commonly viewed as a ‘chatterbox’ or ‘diarrhea of the mouth’, and is seen in the eyes of others as a stereotype for a particular style of speech ill suited for the speaker.

Take my experience, for example: my wording was advanced, as seen by the confused expression of the woman  listening to me. However, the sound made by my voice was that of an unusual variety, brought on from natural development, and so the woman assumed me of a more ‘fruity’ individual than I was. Her inability to focus on what was said rather than what it sounded like led to a rash decision with little more than stereotypical evidence to back it up. It is likely that she didn’t even notice what kind of person I was, so absorbed by her own fantasies as she was.

Others that I have met have made nasty comments about the intelligence of those with less structure in their speech, making remarks about the idiocy and incompetence of people with such things as stutters and lisps (both words being a cruel irony to those who suffer from them respectively). I have known many people with issues with speech structure, and known a select few to be even more intelligent and capable than myself, a moderately difficult feat to those smart ass readers out there.

This is, of course, an obvious flaw in human beings, believing everything to be of surface value unless taught otherwise. Don’t feel that you are a good person throughout, for you are not: no person is born understanding, but rather misunderstanding. Everything must be learned from others who themselves learned at one point.

Helga is in full agreement with me when I say that the people that you meet are the worst people you will ever know. If you have anything wrong with the way you speak, be it a mild case of lisp, or perhaps an irritant in your vocal prowess, you are bound to first be judged unfairly on those qualities which you have no control over.

In a related point, if you have a terrible voice and a terrible way of structuring what little you have (I’m looking at you, Nada), then it is only fair that you avoid from talking to others about the way that they speak, regardless of how good you’ve fooled yourself into thinking that you sound. Hypocrites are nothing more than an attempt at salvation in other people’s follies.

Don’t judge others on voice, as it is near impossible to gain any useful knowledge from the sound that people make, or the way that sound approaches you.

Yours Illusory,

Crane.

Killer Ideas

May 5, 2010

I only just realized this.

I was looking at a small 5 Amp resistor today, and I found myself wondering how best to utilize it as a weapon. I thought of increasing the magnitude of the cutoff spark, extending beyond the glass casing, blowing shards of glass shrapnel in every direction, while at the same time blinding all within range through a brilliant flash of energy.

When I expressed these views to a friend, with whom I usually confided my thoughts, he responded with a look suggesting that my idea was to be expected of me. When I asked what was wrong, he informed me that I always think such things.

“Every time you see something”, he had told me, ” you have to envision it as a weapon designed to cause grief or death”

For a moment, I had been stunned by this conclusion, thinking that he was basing it on one or two events before. But then I thought about it, and it made sense.

Since the time I held my first blunt object, I had seen everything in a manner befitting a weapon in some way, be it by adding metal spikes to a bouncy ball, or by imagining how to best manifest an old man’s cane into a portable Gatling gun. I was insanely obsessed with weapons, to the point where I hunted down several antique swords of differing origin, and collected every legalized weapon available.

But now that I realize my obsession, I wonder what it all means.

Do I have some deep, unknown sadistic nature that is still waiting to fully form, or do I have some form of compensation issue that I’m not facing? Do I have some developmental issues that make it more difficult for me to associate weapons with danger, or do I have some lack of morality that inhibits my understanding of the world and it’s principles?

The answer could be any or all of those. Though based on common reactions in people around me, whereby any sudden movements of mine will usually make them flinch or twitch slightly, I may be able to narrow it down to a single cause.

So, let’s recap: I have a thing for weapons and harming people, I enjoy the idea of destruction, and I probably would have no problem blowing up a building of starving orphan waifs. I doubt that even a highly trained psychiatrist would be able to reach a conclusion that didn’t involve the use of a trained lobotomist and a dark alley during happy hour.

I wonder: what does everyone else think of this? Do you all think I’m insane, not to be trusted with my own office, let alone a squadron of staff members, all incredibly capable in their respective fields, or am I just lonely, and in need of a hug?

If you choose the latter, let me make it perfectly clear that I’m not cured yet, and am completely willing (and most probably able) to perform immoral acts without batting an eyelid. I only ever hug my mother, and only once biannually.

Oh, and a last side note: recently, Ive had several complaints from the mathematical community, most of them based on my scathing comment on the subject of their work ethic. In order to avoid mass murder charges, Helga has given me the alternative of apologizing.

I don’t like this alternative.

So, I came up with a better, more user friendly one: either the monstrous mob of miffed mathematicians leaves, or I pull out the big guns, starting with the Ackermann Function with Graham’s Number. I feel it also prudent to warn you all that I have an Erdős Number of 6. Mathematicians, you have been warned.

Yours Tautologically,

Crane.

Time and Again…

April 29, 2010

Is turning back time really worth it in the end?

I was posed with an interesting question once, long ago, when I was a far more care-free individual. I was asked the question of, if I could do so, would I turn back time and do it all again? Would I, with all my current knowledge and ability, go back and redo my life from a specified point?

Of course, this was simply a little joke between colleagues, a way to pass the time. But of course, as is my usual approach to things of interest, I became fascinated with a challenge that was entirely improbable for the simple reason that it acted to further expand my understanding of human nature.

All through the nights of the week or so following, I would lie in bed and stay awake for hours thinking of the infinite possibilities, untroubled by fatigue, surrounded by the shapeless blackness. I was obsessed with discovering the hidden truth behind the exercise, the meaning it had in reference to the human psyche.

I thought of the horrors I would have to relive, the sadness of the inevitable events that I could not control. I imagined a hundred different actions that I would have taken at each turn of my life, knowing full well what I would miss should I take another path, and wondering of the mysteries of those not taken. And when I found that I was bored with the world as it was, I would start again, and follow a different path, a different life, influenced by my knowledge of things to come and skills obtained in times nonexistent.

But of course, I eventually came out of my reverie, aware of my true mission. I had discovered the truth behind these thoughts, and how only those of the highest intelligence would be able to answer the question accurately, with the hesitation and fear of the unknown.

After a brief study, in which I analysed the responses and reactions to the question posed to other individuals in other, varied circumstances, I found that the answer was not so much important as the way in which it was given, the time it took for one to establish a conclusion, and whether or not they sought the aid of an outside source.

You can imagine the results: those of a lower level of intellect (offense is optional) tended to lean towards the ‘yes’ answer, taking far less time to consider the consequences of such an action than others, focusing more on the aspect of power and freedom that they may have in this new reality, with the ‘incredible’ store of knowledge they had at their disposal.

Those of a more intellectually established variety had similar answers, though not in all individuals, and certainly not in the same manner as those mentioned previously. One of a higher intellect would usually consider the problem, seeing it as a logic puzzle more than an opportunity, weighing the pro’s and con’s of going back and reliving their life.

And here is where the elements of human psychology are evident. Some individuals, regardless of intelligence, would answer the question without thinking, giving either a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ dependent on their current situation. If an individual was found to suffer from a form of depression or other form of psychological injury brought about after their birth, or even physical injuries of the same type, the individual would answer ‘yes’. No doubt, any chance to remove undesirable elements from ones life would cloud ones concentration, and lead to a choice with little consideration for side-effects.

One who had recently experienced a great happiness in their life, such as a new and thriving relationship, would always answer ‘no’ to the query, preferring to live their life content now, regardless of how poorly their life had gone, or the possibility of improvement. This override of common sense was also present in the intelligent subjects, showing a trend in human nature that could be the key to understanding the nature of psychological ailments that afflict humans.

We, as human beings, are incredibly dense. We are unable to place our full focus on more than one thing at a time, and splitting of focus is only undertaken by the most skilled of minds. Our intellect is undone by something as simple as a pocket calculator, and so we leave it to the calculator to do our jobs for us. We are so incredibly dense that we are unable to focus on the proverbial ‘big picture’, to see the possibilities of our future from our immediate actions.

So, from something as simple as a question, the human mind can be analysed, broken down and studied. Focus is a gift bestowed upon so few individuals, that it is hardly ever noticed.

Naturally, I wouldn’t go around insulting the whole human race if I wasn’t part of it all. Indeed, I may be one of the most unintelligent and ridiculously dense individuals on the surface of the Earth, a statistic that is quite commonly quoted by Helga in the Lunch Room. All I mean by this generalization is, when one takes the time to think, they realize how little they think about. With absolute certainty, it can be said that no human, regardless  of how much time they have or intellect they possess, has the capacity to understand, and therefore contemplate, so much as 1/1,000,000,000,000,000th of all the knowledge in existence, a fact that makes people wonder why it is that they attempt to expand their minds in the first place if they make so little headway.

Overall, I’d say that this experiment was one of little consequence. Much like literacy, great amounts of effort don’t always yield results, but unlike Physics, Mathematics, and any other subject that involves absolute truths (especially Mathematics, where new rules are created daily in an attempt to solve the unsolvable and reach a conclusion that isn’t there) as the prime topic of understanding, there is still the possibility of improving the formula.

So know this, readers: you are only as smart as human psychology allows, and the human psychology has it’s limits.

And know this, ponderers of the Mathematical arts: your field isn’t going anywhere, nor is it currently vital to make it go anywhere. Take some time off and enjoy the rest of the world, experiencing new sensations with the smug satisfaction coming from knowing that you’ve solved all your mysteries, and still get paid leave.

Yours Distastefully,

Crane.

That was too easy…

April 26, 2010

It couldn’t be the answer, could it?

Only today, I was approached by my cousin with a serious problem: his friend whom he’d only just met on Facebook was suicidal, and needed serious help. This is far beyond my usual family greeting, but I agreed to help in any way that I could.

Of course, the individual will remain anonymous, but the details are free to be shared, should anyone request them.

As it turns out, the individual in question was suffering from stress and depression due to bullying, a common contributor in such cases. Naturally, I polished my glasses and readied myself for the negotiations with the mind for the body’s life.

Only half an hour in, and I find that this individual is truly under distress o the highest degree, and isn’t some nut-case with a cruel sense of humor and some time to kill. And so, as with all those who know what they are doing, I tried to discuss the matter, without ever touching on the matter itself.

Now, most would think that this is normal, and that some results may come of the first ‘session’, if not noticeable. However, the truly unusual thing about the individual was the rate at which they recovered.

I’m not just talking about some guy who was only under the impression that he was truly depressed without actually being so. This was real, and the results of my help were startling: only an hour into the chat, and he demonstrated no signs of depression, no physical showings of stress. The individual was fully recovered within the space of an hour and a half, without any apparent mental scarring.

Now, I’m not one to toot my own horn, and so I won’t. I put the overall success down to two possible reasons: either the individual wanted to change, and was willing to accept any alternative to his suicidal nature, or he was a very, very, very good actor with Jedi mind powers at his disposal who simply had other things to do.

Seeing as how the individual failed to demonstrate any above-average cognitive ability, and had a history of being in a submissive role, I highly doubt that it was the latter. Still, Yoda was about 800 years old, and advances in medicine could lead to a variety of possibilities for a Jedi…

Back to the point, this individual was far too easy to sway, and demonstrated none of the resulting psychological anomalies of a recovering suicidal. So, for the next couple of weeks, I will continue to monitor him as best I can to ensure that no recurring issues lead to a lapse into depression once more.

I hope that all ends well, if only to demonstrate that fee advice isn’t always bad advice.

Yours Despondently,

Crane.