Gernot WagnerПотврђен налог

@GernotWagner

Climate economist, 's +1. It’s pronounced juggernaut without the jug.

NYC
gwagner.com
Придружио/ла се март 2009.
771 Фотографија и видео Фотографије и видео снимци

твит(ов)а

Блокирао/ла си корисника @GernotWagner

Да ли сигурно желиш да видиш ове твитове? Приказивање твитова неће одблокирати корисника @GernotWagner

  1. Закачен твит
    пре 20 сати

    Congratulations, you won a seat on Exxon's board. Now what? My latest for /

    5 одговори 19 ретвитови 56 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  2. је ретвитовао/ла
    пре 18 сати

    Netherlands court decision is a fabulous summary of the state of science and the true plans of the oil and gas industry. Anyone dealing w/ l'affaire could refer people here:

    2 8 ретвитови 20 свиђања
    Опозови
  3. је ретвитовао/ла
    пре 11 сати

    Some recent bills that were defeated by filibuster along with the number of votes they got in the Senate. Jan. 6 commission: 54 votes DREAM Act: 55 votes Manchin-Toomey: 54 votes DISCLOSE Act: 59 votes Paycheck Fairness Act: 58 votes

    223 1.966 ретвитови 3.781 свиђање
    Опозови
  4. пре 17 сати

    If you want to know how bit of a deal the Exxon board vote was, follow the money: $65 million total on both sides, $35 million of it spent by the folks up Las Colinas Boulevard

    1 одговор 2ретвитова 9 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  5. је ретвитовао/ла
    20. мај

    if these were the only things nyc's next mayor did in 4 years, it would still be totally transformative. great to see this in the mayor's race.

    Garcia's climate plans are as ambitious, detailed, and sensible as any I've seen (not just in this mayoral race). She has detailed mitigation and adaptation plans. Framing it all as a "war against asphalt and asthma" is a winner, too.
    Прикажи овај низ
    1 одговор 7 ретвитови 18 свиђања
    Опозови
  6. је ретвитовао/ла
    27. мај

    Kathryn Garcia knows her shit.

    26 одговори 94ретвитова 538 свиђања
    Опозови
  7. је ретвитовао/ла
    пре 19 сати

    “Some oil companies support an initial U.S. tax on carbon at $50 per ton, while asking for hundreds of dollars per ton to remove carbon via CCS. There’s a clear mismatch.” via

    8 ретвитови 17 свиђања
    Опозови
  8. је ретвитовао/ла
    28. мај

    Thread: our journey towards (maybe) electrifying our house. Or, inspired by the climate risk assessment literature: decision making under deep uncertainty. Mostly for me, to think through the options, but maybe of use for others. 1/~ a million

    4 2ретвитова 28 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  9. пре 18 сати

    Shiny. Oh, and secure & sound-proof, too.

    6 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  10. је ретвитовао/ла
    пре 18 сати

    Will oil companies seek gov support for CCS that’s worth way above the $50/t co2 price they advocate for? Because that could be awkward. Excellent piece by

    1 одговор 7 ретвитови 10 свиђања
    Опозови
  11. пре 18 сати

    Step 3

    1 одговор 2ретвитова 4 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  12. пре 18 сати

    Step 2: write column while this is going on in the background

    1 одговор 3 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  13. пре 18 сати

    19 years of marriage, and my weeks-long plot to lock out went off without a hitch. Step 1: say goodbye to the old door.

    2 2ретвитова 5 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  14. пре 20 сати

    That's where another vote, which, at 48%, Chevron shareholders narrowly lost, may be at least as important: full disclosure of its lobbying $$$s. For more:

    1 одговор 3ретвитова 6 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  15. пре 20 сати

    You can't ask for CCS handouts in the $100/t CO₂, while limiting climate policy ambition to $50/t CO₂. Of course, Exxon & Co won't suddenly reverse course.

    2 2ретвитова 4 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  16. пре 20 сати

    Exxon proposed a $100 billion "CCS hub." To make the math work, it wants government handouts. Lots of them. The $50/ton CO₂ Q45 tax credits aren't enough. Fine. But then it can't think a $50/ton CO₂ tax, trading away other regs—"regulatory simplification"—is enough.

    1 одговор 3ретвитова 3 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  17. пре 20 сати

    Add to that last week's net-zero report saying "new oil or gas fields" and you see the dominos falling. None of it alone, of course, means much on its own. What matters is how it translates into concrete action. There may be a simple test to tell.

    3 2ретвитова 4 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  18. пре 20 сати

    Shell must cut its CO₂ 45% by 2030, all of it, including from the oil it sells. Chevron must come up with its own absolute, Scope 3 CO₂ target. Exxon management lost a board vote to a hedge fund holding 0.02% of its stock. And that was Wednesday.

    1 одговор 2ретвитова 8 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  19. је ретвитовао/ла
    28. мај

    HAPPENING NOW - East Bay, Richmond family, stay safe and inside if possible. Just days before the is set to weigh in on a rule, the refinery is flaring again. Via 📸:

    8 одговори 120 ретвитови 167 свиђања
    Прикажи овај низ
    Прикажи овај низ
    Опозови
  20. је ретвитовао/ла
    28. мај

    Mayor 's efforts to rein in car use & fight pollution only look easy. Bold leadership is at play. There have been court battles and protests to get to this point. Her clear-eyed focus on the future is leading the way.

    9 ретвитови 49 свиђања
    Опозови

@GernotWagner још увек није твитовао/ла.

Учитавање ће потрајати.

Твитер је можда премашио капацитет или је тренутно наишао на проблем. Покушај поново или посети статус Твитера за више информација.

    Можда ће ти се свидети

    ·